Arhiva Danja Gašpar Đokić - Mili Dueli https://milidueli.com/tag/danja-gaspar-dokic/ International Online Poetry Contest Sat, 01 Jul 2023 09:50:36 +0000 hr hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 https://milidueli.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/cropped-mili-dueli-logo-32x32.png Arhiva Danja Gašpar Đokić - Mili Dueli https://milidueli.com/tag/danja-gaspar-dokic/ 32 32 165055296
Mili Dueli 2023 – Danska (Poezija i književna kritika) https://milidueli.com/2023/07/01/danska/ https://milidueli.com/2023/07/01/danska/#respond Sat, 01 Jul 2023 09:50:04 +0000 https://milidueli.com/?p=13600 RESULTS REZULTATI LITERARY CRITICISM OF JURY MEMBERS KNJIŽEVNA KRITIKA ŽIRIJA Književna kritika (komentar) žirija na pročitane pjesme: Nermin Delić:  Sveukupno, odabrani danski autori su ostavili vrlo dobar utisak na mene. Čitao sam pjesme više puta…

Objava Mili Dueli 2023 – Danska (Poezija i književna kritika) pojavila se prvi puta na Mili Dueli.

]]> RESULTS
REZULTATI

LITERARY CRITICISM OF JURY MEMBERS
KNJIŽEVNA KRITIKA ŽIRIJA

Književna kritika (komentar) žirija na pročitane pjesme:

Nermin Delić:  Sveukupno, odabrani danski autori su ostavili vrlo dobar utisak na mene. Čitao sam pjesme više puta i pažljivo dao svoje ocjene. Moj glavni kriterij je bila količina poezije koja je prikazana u pjesmama, a tu se ocjenjuje originalna upotreba metafora i poređenja kao stilskih figura.

Autori Poul i Niels su poslali odlične pjesme. Pohvale Anđeli za maestralan prevod Nielsove pjesme! Nemam zamjerke.

(Authors Poul and Niels sent great poems. I have no complaints.)

Autorica Alma je poslala pjesmu koja je ostala u službi rime, umjesto obrnuto – da je rima u službi pjesme. Pisati u rimi znači ukalupiti se u tačan broj slogova. U suprotnom, ovakve pjesme koje ne slijede pravila pisanja poezije u rimi, liče na zapis duše iz spomenara. Volio bih da se autorica liši rime ili ako je piše, da piše pjesme sa jednakim brojem slogova u svakom stihu, kako bi ritam bio besprijekoran… jer o tome vode računa PJESNICI, ali ne i TEKSTOPISCI. Treba razmisliti o tome. Autorica je divna kao osoba i meni jedan od dražih autora, dodao bih još to.

Halid Begović – Odlične prve tri strofe, ako izuzmemo gramatičke (ne prkos – neprkos) i interpunkcijske greške (pripaziti na zareze i razmake u trećoj strofi). Četvrta strofa, kao da nije iz te pjesme. Ritam se naglo prekida, postaje brži, nešto fali, izgleda nedovršeno. Ako je ponestalo inspiracije, pjesma je mogla odstajati, jer se pjesme pišu danima, mjesecima, a ponekad i godinama, ali se mora pronaći dostojno poentiranje na ovako divne tri strofe. Druga strofa je antologijska!

Anđela Turukalo: Poul Lynggaard Damgaard – this is a good poem. I like your expression, appreciate the imagery. Yet, it is a bit chaotic. I would like to see a better shaped poem next time. Separate it into strophes, it will help a lot. Aesthetics is important for the readers. This way- the eyes get tired.

Niels Hav, perfect. I loved it. The imagery, the expression, the motifs, the title, the ending… The topic. Everything was flawless.

Alma Buljubašić Maglić, lijepa pjesma, emotivna. Ipak, fali joj snage i originalnijih motiva.

Lela Zjajo: POUL LYNGGAARD DAMGAARD – Pročitah pjesmu nekoliko puta ali mi nije uspjelo dotaći do kraja misli autora. Činjenica je da se radi o već iskusnom pjesniku koji riječju pronikne u vlastite dubine razmišljanja i rječitosti. Da li je to blisko i onima koji ga čitaju, za njega nije problem, čini se. U svakom slučaju pokazao je neke nove smjernice u poeziji koje su djelimično inovativne i savremene i vrlo cijenim svaki lični pokušaj da se na svoj način nametne čitaocu. Vrlo kreativna i originalna pjesma!

(I read the poem several times, but I did not manage to reach the end of the author’s thoughts. The fact is that this is an already experienced poet who penetrates with words into his own depths of thinking and eloquence. Whether it is close to those who read it is not a problem for him, it seems. In any case, he showed some new directions in poetry that are partly innovative and contemporary, and I appreciate very much every personal attempt to impose himself on the reader in his own way. Very creative and original poem!)

NIELS HAV – Stihovi ovog autora su izvanredni i ovo je najupečatljivija pjesma koju do sada pročitah od početka trajanja MD ove godine. Originalnost svakog stiha je poput dvosmijerne ulice. Na jednoj strani prividna pozitiva, na drugoj okrutna realnost. Izvanredno urađena pjesma i sa ciljem da se napokon shvati današnjica u pravom svjetlu. Respekt!

(This author’s verses are outstanding and this is the most memorable poem I’ve read so far since MD started this year. The originality of each verse is like a two-way street. On one side, apparent positivity, on the other, cruel reality. An exceptionally well-made poem with the aim of finally understanding today in the right light. Respect!)

ALMA BULJUBAŠIĆ MAGLIĆ – Ovakve stihove piše osjećajna duša, a pri tom, ne pazeći da stihu doda i mali, malecki dah poetičnosti ili udahne barem kratki značajniji izraz koji bi stihu dao bogatije izdanje. Lično, u poeziji više nalazim vrijednosti pisanja po osjećaju, po emociji u svakoj riječi, ali poneki stiih okićen i ponekom stilskom figuricom, daje i efektniji izraz da ne bi došlo do izlizanog klišea u poeziji ili tek osjećaj da se napisao stih, a da je to već pročitano, viđeno, Ova autorica posjeduje prirodni talenat i nadahnuće joj ne nedostaje. Inspirativna je i privlačni su ti njeni stihovi i pjesme na poseban način. Svakako ima moju podršku. Motiv njene pjesme je jasan. Ljubav se osjeća u svakom stihu, ali tu mi nedostaje cjeline u pjesmi, što me nagnalo da o ovoj pjesmi i nemam neko određeno mišljenje. Cijenim autoricu i ponekad me osvježi svojom nadahnutošću. Ovaj put nedostaje malo originalnosit i pojačane želje za boljim predstavljanjem. Srećno!

HALID BEGOVIĆ (HAKO) – I ovdje se radi o autoru koji je vičan napisati pjesmu. Na prvi pogled privlačni stihovi, lijepo opisana stanja duha i svjesnosti. Interesantna tema se provlači iz retka u red i osjećam da autor teži savremenijem stvaranju poezije što je, svakako, pohvalno. U posljednje vrijeme često se susrećemo sa sličinim stihovima, no na različite načine i baš je u tome priivlačnost ovakvog izražaja. Voljela bih još po nešto pročitati od ovog autora, što će mi i biti prilika, ukoliko ovaj autor prođe ovaj krug u MD. Jedina primjedba je uredniji prikaz interpunkcije i obratiti pažnju na višak riječi koje kvare ugođaj.!

Danja Gašpar Đokić: Poul Lynggaard Damgaard dobra pjesma, interesantan način i iskaz odnosa dvoje ljudi, baš me dodirnula.  (good poem, interesting way and expression of the relationship between two people, it really touched me.)

Niels Hav WOW, sjajno, sjajno, čista esencija poezije. (Wow, amazing, amazing… the pure essence of poetry)

Alma Buljubašić Maglić patetična pjesma, rima duša-sluša, voli-boli već je davno izlizana i ne može dati dobru pjesmu.

Halid Begović (Hako) pjesma je lijepa i dojmljiva, rima originalna, nesvakidasnja, samo se u zadnjoj strofi izgubio ritam, šteta.

 

POETRY
POEZIJA

Poul Lynggaard Damgaard, 1977.
Danska, Aarhus
SAT NA ZGRADI LAŽENeposredno pred sastanak, bez daha,
sama strast je sistem bez tijela.
Sat na zgradi laže.
U toku vremena je određena linija.
Idemo zajedno uz zid, u beskonačnost.
Sat je nekada pripadao novim senzacijama.
Svi smo ovdje iz istog razloga.
Okupljeni smo oko iste eksplodirane sobe
koju je neko godinama skrivao.
Ovaj sat nije tvoja stvarnost.
Očekuje se da svi ostanu unutra
i stoga naš susret na otvorenom sve iznenađuje.
Zemlja leži mrtva.
Otpadaju kazaljke sata.
Tvoje su misli usred oblasti zauvijek.
Volim tvoj smijeh, kad podižeš uvijene grane.
Gledaš dolje, na put, zadržavaš svoju ličnost
daleko od površine. Puzavci se penju na drvo,
ubijajući ga. Dođe vrijeme
kada je povjerljivost tvoj izraz.
Pratim tvoje tijelo i čekam sebe.
Na piramidi civilizacije pali se varnica.
Uvijek isti stavovi u istoj plavoj praznini,
na jeziku koji ne razumijem. Nešto raste na visokom usponu,
a ulica se ruši pred mojim očima. Ljut sam na zgradu
koja uliva nadu. Nikad više nećeš vidjeti ovu gomilu.

Translated to Montenegrin by Anđela Turukalo Dabetić
……………………………………………………………………………..
THE CLOCK ON THE BUILDING IS LYING

Just before the meeting without breath
passion itself is a system without a body.
The clock on the building is lying.
In the course of time is a certain line.
We go together up along the wall in infinity.
The clock once belonged to new sensations.
We are all here for the same reason.
We are gathered around the same exploded room,
somebody had hidden for years.
This clock is not your reality.
It is expected that everyone stays inside,
and therefore our meeting in the open surprises everyone.
The ground lies dead.
The apostatized clock hands of the clock.
Your thoughts in the middle of the area forever.
I love your laughter, when you lift the twisted branches.
You look down at the road and you keep your personality
away from the surface. Creepers climb the tree
and kill it. A time comes to itself,
when confidentiality is your expression.
I follow your body and wait for myself.
A spark is lit at the pyramid of civilization.
Always the same attitudes out into the same blue emptiness
in a language I do not understand. Something grows on the high rise,
and the street collapses before my eyes. I am angry at the building
that lets hope in. You will never see this crowd again.
…………………………………………………………………………….
URET PÅ BYGNINGEN LYVER

Lige før mødet uden åndedræt
er lidenskab i sig selv et system uden krop.
Uret på bygningen lyver.
Under tidens forløb er en bestemt linje.
Vi følges op ad bygningen i uendelighed.
Uret tilhørte engang nye sansninger.
Vi er samlet om det samme
eksploderede rum, nogen havde skjult i årevis.
Dette ur er ikke din virkelighed.
Der er en forventning om at alle bliver inde,
og derfor overrasker vores møde i det åbne alle.
Grunden ligger død.
Urets frafaldne visere.
Dine tanker midt i området i evighed.
Jeg elsker din latter, når du løfter de fravristede grene.
Du kigger ned på vejen, og du holder din personlighed
væk fra overfladen. Slyngplanter kravler i træet
og tager livet af det. En tid kommer til sig selv,
hvor tavshedspligten er dit udtryk.
Jeg følger efter din krop, og venter på mig selv.
En gnist tændes ved civilisationens pyramide.
Altid de samme holdninger ud i den samme blå tomhed
i et sprog jeg ikke forstår. Noget gror på højhuset,
og gaden styrter for mit blik. Jeg er vred på bygningen,
der lukker håbet ind. Denne folkemængde ser du aldrig igen.

Niels Hav, 1949.
Denmark, Copenhagen
LOVITI GUŠTERE U MRAKUTokom ubistava, nesvjesni,
šetali smo pored jezera.
Govorila si o Šimanovskom,
proučavao sam vranu
koja prebira po psećem izmetu.
Oboje opterećeni sobom,
opkoljeni ljuskom neznanja
koje štiti naše predrasude.

Holisti vjeruju da leptir na Himalajima
zamahom krila može uticati na klimu
na Antarktiku. Možda je istina.
Ali, tamo gdje tenkovi ulaze,
a sa drveća kaplju meso i krv:
to nije utjeha.

Traganje za istinom je isto kao loviti guštere
u mraku. Grožđe je iz Južne Afrike,
pirinač iz Pakistana, urme uzgajane u Iranu.
Podržavamo ideju otvorenih granica
za voće i povrće,
ali kako god da se okrenemo:
zadnjica je pozadi.

Mrtvi su sahranjeni duboko u novinama
da bismo mi, netaknuti, mogli sjesti na klupu
na periferiji raja
i sanjati leptire.

Translated to Montenegrin by Anđela Turukalo Dabetić
………………………………………………………………………………….
HUNTING LIZARDS IN THE DARK

During the killings unaware
we walked along the lakes.
You spoke of Szymanowski,
I studied a rook
picking at dog shit.
Each of us caught up in ourselves
surrounded by a shell of ignorance
that protects our prejudices.

The holists believe that a butterfly in the Himalayas
with the flap of a wing can influence the climate
in Antarctica. It may be true.
But where the tanks roll in
and flesh and blood drip from the trees
that is no comfort.

Searching for truth is like hunting lizards
in the dark. The grapes are from South Africa,
the rice from Pakistan, the dates grown in Iran.
We support the idea of open borders
for fruit and vegetables,
but however we twist and turn
the ass is at the back.

The dead are buried deep inside the newspaper,
so that we, unaffected, can sit on a bench
on the outskirts of paradise
and dream of butterflies.

Translated to English by P. K. Brask & Patrick Friesen
…………………………………………
AT FANGE FIRBEN I MØRKE

Under myrderierne gik vi
intetanende tur langs søerne.
Du snakkede om Szymanowski.
Jeg studerede en krage,
der hakkede i en hundelort.
Enhver er fanget i sin eget,
omgivet af en hård skal af uvi¬denhed,
som beskyt¬ter vore fordomme.

Holisterne tror, at en sommerfugl i Himalaya
med et vingeslag kan påvirke klimaet
i Antarktis. Måske er det sandt.
Men der, hvor kampvognene ruller ind,
og kød og blod drypper fra træerne,
er det ingen trøst.

At søge sandheden er som at fange firben
i mørke. Druerne er fra Sydafrika,
risen fra Pakistan, dadlerne er dyrket i Iran.
Vi støtter ideen om åbne grænser
for frugt og grønt,
men hvordan vi end vender og drejer os,
vender røven bagud.

De døde begraves dybt inde i avisen,
så vi uanfægtede kan sætte os på en bænk
i udkanten af paradis
og drømme om sommerfugle.

Alma Buljubašić Maglić, 1956.
Danska, Hillerød
BAŠTA LJUBAVISve ljubavi jedna drugoj sliče
naša u tami vene,
ostale su ukipljene priče
a u njima nema mene..

Kad noć otkuca svoje kasne sate
tad zadrhti mi duša,
bolne uspomene snovima se vrate
dok tišina moju bol sluša..

Srce je moje ram sudbine
osjeti mi boli,
vatra iz njega sine
zna da jednom se samo voli..

Bez ljubavi lutam,spavam bez cilja
ne postojim bez nje,
s njom ostvarujem sne
bašta je najljepšeg mi bilja…

Dušo moja
svjetlost mi na grudi stavi,
da još jednom vidim njen sjaj u travi.

Halid Begović (Hako), 1968.
Danska, Kolding
ZEMLJANIN U SAMOĆI SVEMIRAO,strašne li jeze biti sam
s algama, ribama, oktopodima,
Zaronih kao ronac vodopadima
gdje su sreća, bol,blud i sram.

Ne prkos sam naspram ideologija,
neću da se srljam u šljam tmine,
Sveto je svako ja bez olupine,
svemirski brod u vodi orgija.

Kroz nisku zvijezda ,planeta i struja
Lelujava ,modra sjena me ljulja.
Okular zemljanina još baulja,
gdje napon galaksije zazuja.

Da mi se vozit umjesto shatla,
mislima da osjetim vriježe
što svemirsku braću veže
veliko srce za ova stakla.

Objava Mili Dueli 2023 – Danska (Poezija i književna kritika) pojavila se prvi puta na Mili Dueli.

]]> https://milidueli.com/2023/07/01/danska/feed/ 0 13600 Mili Dueli 2023 – Bosna i Hercegovina (Poezija i književne kritike) https://milidueli.com/2023/06/23/mili-dueli-2023-bosna-i-hercegovina-poezija-i-knjizevne-kritike/ https://milidueli.com/2023/06/23/mili-dueli-2023-bosna-i-hercegovina-poezija-i-knjizevne-kritike/#respond Fri, 23 Jun 2023 11:17:57 +0000 https://milidueli.com/?p=13468   PJESME   Amra Zahirović, 2004. Bosna i Hercegovina, Banovići JEDINO MOJE RAZOČARANJE Mirno je. Tek poneka sjena zaigra kad vjetar zanjiše grane. Tišina. U sebi sakrila sam tebe. Duboko negdje, ne mogu te naći…

Objava Mili Dueli 2023 – Bosna i Hercegovina (Poezija i književne kritike) pojavila se prvi puta na Mili Dueli.

]]>

 

PJESME

 

Amra Zahirović, 2004.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Banovići
JEDINO MOJE RAZOČARANJE

Mirno je.
Tek poneka sjena zaigra kad vjetar zanjiše grane.
Tišina.
U sebi sakrila sam tebe.
Duboko negdje,
ne mogu te naći i kad bih htjela.
Znam samo da si tu. U dubini moga srca.
Pada mrak.
Vjetar se smiri pa više ni grane
ne igraju okolo.
I opet tišina.
Samo ta tišina budi neki nemir
pa umjesto grane zaigra srce.
Sjetim se tako nekad tebe
dok pada još jedna duga noć.
Bježim od svojih misli.
U njima si moj, samo moj.
U mojim si mislima sretan
i zajedno koračamo u budućnost.
U ovoj stvarnosti,
ovoj prokletoj tišini preko dana,
Nema nas zajedno.
Postojiš ti i postojim ja.
Ti živiš život za sebe, a ja svoj za tebe…
I čekam te.
Čekam da otvoriš umorno srce
kad ti zarastu rane prošlosti.
Bojim se da neću dočekati
a ne mogu prestati čekati.
Zaspim tako
čekajući da mi neki glas u tišini javi
ko si ustvari i šta smo na kraju
ti i ja.
Jesmo li ti i ja “mi”?
Ili sam ja – ja, a ti – ti,
jedan moj poraz.
Jedan jedini.
Najveći.
Želja veća od mogućnosti.
Moj ti.
Moj san neostvareni.
Jedna suza pred spavanje,
molitva u kojoj si,
jedino moje razočaranje.

 

 

 

 

Jasmina Bojić, 2005.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Banovići (Trulovići)
U TRENUTKU

Za trenutak sam te dobila,
na trenutak imala,
u trenutku izgubila…
Kad bi bar kriv bio
srcu da olakšam,
da zaboravim te.
Da si me bar uvrijedio,
na te nikad da ne pomislim.
Imena da ti se ne sjetim,
glas da ne pamtim.
Tiho si mi došao,
još tiše se izgubio,
a najtiše otišao…
Ne vraćaj mi se u snovima,
boliš me.
Pocijepat ću slike,
sakrit ću te od sebe.
Tragove dodira tvojih
sa kože ja ću isprati.
Neću više da te osjećam.
Budi tuđi,
da te odbolujem
i u rijeku nadu bacim.
Budi svoj,
putem zaborava kreni
i oduzmi mi želje puste.
Budi ti
i u trenutku bešumno nestani.

 

 

 

 

Nikolina Plavšić, 1970.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Banja Luka
(NE)VID

Crnilo kaplje odasvud,
Gusto kao smola,
Zamagljuje duh,
Vid se propinje
Iz bola,
Do bola,
Da vidi
Dušu golu.

Katran se zalijepio
Za srce,
Okorio ga,
Steže obruč oko njega.

(Ne)vid sija
U tami,
Blista,
Vidi
I ono što je
Sakriveno
Od bola.

 

 

 

 

Marina Šestak , 1986.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Banja Luka
GOLI UM

To je dovoljno golotinje
za valove uzbuđenja
negdje na plaži koja
čuva tragove maštanja.

U tvojoj goloj sjenci
sunča se moja želja i
dobije lijepu boju koja
ne blijedi čitave godine.

Tvoj goli um je seksi.
Ja inteligentnije golotinje
nisam još vidjela.
Zaista!

Ljeto se zamrsilo u
tvojoj kosi, a kapljice soli
klize po rubovima tvog
pokreta kao da plešu
po mom ritmu koji nas
na miru ne ostavlja.

Tvoj goli um je seksi
ja ljepše golotinje
nisam vidjela.
Stvarno!

 

 

 

 

Teodora Morača (Teodorra), 2003.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Banja Luka
STRAH NEOBJAŠNJIVE LJEPOTE

Paralisao me je.
Bilo je to u strahu
neobjašnjive ljepote,
nađene vječnosti i
činilo mi se
kao da je vrijeme stalo,
da je vjetar odustao,
da je razbacao sitno,
grabovo lišče –
zarobljeno u sjajnim kapljicama
u suncu koje je stalo.

Stao je potoka žubor
i krv je moja stala.
Nisam čula u krošnjama
tog vihora pir,
kao ni ptica poj.
Sve je stalo u taj bezvremeni trenutak.
Samo se uzdizao, onako,
lelujavo, zavodljivo ali i ritmično –
kao da pleše salsu.

Crne šare na njegovim rukama,
pisale su arabeske kojima nikako
nisam mogla uhvatiti oblik.
Stajala sam hipnotisana,
polusagnuta –
blatnjavih nogu i ruku, a mokrih očiju.

Nekontrolisano, otkinule su mi se suze,
vidjeh ga uspravljenog ali pogete glave.
Pogledala sam odraz svoj
u njegovim sitnim i crnim
ali blještavim očima.

 

 

 

 

 

Ervin Alagić, 1966.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Bihać
UVELA JE RUŽA BIJELA

Uvenu i moja ruža
Ugasila se zauvijek
Utjehu mi svako pruža
Nepoznat je lijek

Bijem bitku sa sobom
Glavi zbrka, duši lom
Srce puca majko
Bola boli jako

Život si mi dala
Naučila me čovjek biti
Sate zamnom proplakala
Sad ja ne znam suzu skriti

Srce puca majko
Dok te prima dragi Bog
Peku, teku mrakom
Bolne suze sina tvog

Svaka suza tonu ima
Zrakom plovi grob tišina
Nit’ je ljeto nit’ je zima
Tužna sviće pomrčina

Srce puca majko
Svi su moji puti stali
Prekinut je kolosijek
Kanjon lomi jek u odjek

Kad nebeske su kočije
Zazvonile pred vratima
Kažem spremno znam da nije
Zvao sam te satima

Još na licu tvoja ruka
Sjećanje u meni budi
Nemirna je moja muka
Sabur, sabur kažu ljudi

Srce puca majko
Sad mi nije lako
Pogled dići na tvoji prozor
Tvoju sobu prazan prostor

Vrijeme liječi neku ranu
Vel’ku ranu kao branu
Al’ ova bol ne prestaje
Ne odlazi, ne nestaje

Zbogom majko, zbogom oče
Sudbina je tako htjela
Bol sad dođe kad god hoće
Uvela je ruža bijela

Na koljenima uz vaš mezar
Dovu učim, molim Bogu
Položim i koji behar
Zaspao bih al’ ne mogu

Osta duša pusta
Riječi nema s usta
Teška suza u oku
Tješi bolu duboku

 

 

 

 

Enisa Adilović, 1971.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Bihać
LEPET

Umorna sam.
Umorna od strašnih, od silnih,
koji lavovi žele biti,
i vukovi,
a na hijene podsjećaju.

U ovom našem
tamnom vilajetu
valjaju se u blatu,
u potocima tuđih suza,
u lokvama tuđih prezira,
što se u močvare prelijevaju.
Muka vodi muci.
***
Samo dašak želim biti,
koji leptirovo krilo
za sobom ostavlja.

Samo oko srne,
što se sprema u bijeg,
kao opomena.

Samo prasak boje
nebeske duge
da izmamim osmijeh i okrutnima.

Lepet krila ću biti
da se vinem u nebo
i na tren podsjetim
da dobro moglo je biti.

 

 

 

 

 

Ilda Alibegović, 1983.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Bihać
UBRANO SRCE

U čašici od stakla
dvije vezice cvijeća,
kao da se otimaju
nemarnom ubraniku
pa mirišu iz inata
do pune sobe,
zadnjim očajem.

Svako
u zadnjem dahu
izbaci dušu,
a ono miriše
umirući.

Modro srce
mladih latica
sanja
zemlju i rijeku.

Baš sam nalik
tim plahim
stručcima
iz polja.

Kao da hvatam
posljednje zrake
vazduha,
guši me nešto
nevidljivo,
krhko, a jako,
k’o paukova mreža.

Borimo se
tako
cvijeće i ja
od naših
ubranika,
izbacujemo
zadnjih dah
cvijeće i ja,
ono miris,
a ja suzu.

Baš sam nalik
tim laticama
iz polja,
ostalo nam
života
koliko
i vode
u čašici…

 

 

 

 

Danis Halilagić, 2005.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Bihać (Brekovica)
PERSONA NON GRATA

Persona non grata proglašena,
u javnosti sam ozloglašena.
Jer javnost je preplašena
i nisam tako raskalašena!

Riječi moje ruše identitet,
jer nisu narodu epitet.
Kršim zakone moraliteta,
jer nemam prava legimiteta!

Ja pričam jako glasno,
iako to nije efikasno.
Jer riječima je reći kasno,
postalo je u svijetu opasno!

Postala sam legenda života,
jer ljudima su “tabu”teme grozota.
Zgražavaju se na takve stvari,
jer to narod kvari.

Političarima sam bodež misli,
jer nisu zakonima dorasli!
Umjetnik sam bez slobode,
jer kvarim ugled gospode!

Persona non grata svi smo nekada,
velikim moralistima smo blokada.
Nećemo pasti pod njihov uticaj,nikada!
Pogotovo,pod uticaj nekog gada!

 

 

 

 

Benjamin Mujagić, 1950.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Bosanski Novi
NIJE IMALA PRAVO NA ZIVOT

Danas je prestalo da
Kuca tvoje srce, na
Ovom dunjaluku
Allah ti skratio
Svaku muku…

Znala si da neces…
Moci sve to izdrzati
Zasto smo bili prevareni
Na milost i nemilost
Zlotvorima ostavljeni.

Provesti u bolnici
Sto dana, od svojih
Zaboravljena…
Umire a tako lijepo lice
Kazu tvoje prijateljice

U mrtvani nikad ljepsi
Insan, a ja od bola i tuge
Sav u suzama okupan
Kisu Allah spusta iz
Vedra neba… zasto vam
Ovo treba…

Igrali ste i pjevali
Na dan njene dzenaze..
Sad vam nijedan lijek
Ne pomaze…
Saucesce nijeste izjavili
Svome bratu… zato
Pun autobus u
Mostar na sahranu..

A tek sta vas ceka
Nema vam napretka…

 

 

 

 

 

Šaban Srebrenica, 1974.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Busovača
SAVJEST

Sutra, kad se probudim od sna,
prežvakat ću jednu istinu.
Neka bude bolno.
Ni manje ni više od bola noža zarinutog pod rebrima.
Ili malja od šake boksera na obrazima.
Od grimase bola iskrive se i medene usne.
Šta više, čini se da istina prežvakana na tašte,
postade trostruka neistina.
Zla kob.
Čudna dob.
I za tuđina i za svog.

 

 

 

 

Fadila Liđan Murić, 1965.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Cazin
KOGA DA KRIVIM

K’o dragulje sjajne,
rasuta sjećanja skupljam.
Nježno,
jedno po jedno slažem,
pod trepavicu oka.

Uspomene,
k’o prašinu sa slika,
slučajno,
kad pobjegne iz oka,
brišem sa lica.

Koračam bez cilja.
Ostavljam stope
k’o godine teške,
bez nade,
bez odgovora.

Koga da krivim?
Tebe ili sebe
ili nekog trećeg.
Za izgubljene snove,
dane bez nade,
za tugu i bol
i na srcu rane.
Što u očima tvojim
ne gledam sebe,
i ne slušam srce tvoje
kako kuca
u istom ritmu kao i moje.

Koga da krivim?
Sudbinu,
ili možda mladost,
što nije znala,
da doći će dani
kad poželjeti će jako
prošlost da se vrati.

Koga da krivim,
tebe ili sebe?
Bez odgovora
sjećanja skupljam,
želje i nade
i nedosanjane snove.

 

 

 

 

Sofija Kunić, 2007.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Drvar (Vrtoce)
KISA

Kisa, osecaj smirenosti koju ona pruza
Otvaram prozor,ona pojaca ton pa ga naglo smiri
Melodija za moju dusu, ostavite je preko noci volim kad je duza
Snazni,grubi vetar naokolo da piri

Nek se pomesa, gromovi oluja
Ugasite svetlo, hocu tisinu, noc
Upalite svece, nek nestane struja
Da prozivim taj zvuk, da osetim tu moc

Gledam kako cvece nise se na sve strane
Kako napokon sve zivnu, zvizdi, krece
One burne misli odletese u vir,nestajahu polako rane
Te harmonije mi nikad dosta biti nece
.
Trenuci dok je cekam, pa sve zapostavim
Priustim sebi miran san
Taj svima dosadan dan, sebicno cu da ostavim samo za sebe,
Jer vrlo cesto suosecam takav dan, siv,tmuran, i umoran

 

 

 

 

 

Irina Stanković, 1988.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Foča
PORTRET

Ja sam samo
slika okačena negde na zidu
tvojih sećanja.
Bledi portret
na pohabanom platnu.
Poraz za umetnost,
Raznolikost i lepotu boja.
Hendikep za vešte ruke
umetnika i njegov čarobni kist.
Iscrtana kontura
ženske lepote
unakažena bledim sivilom
senki prošlosti.
Samo sam bledi trag
jedne mladosti
i bezvredni prašnjavi crtež
bačen u zaborav.
Ja sam tamna senka
Okačena negde na zidu
Tvojih sećanja…

 

 

 

 

 

Sabina Imamović Dolo, 1959.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Goražde
SVE PROLAZI…..

Prolazi vrijeme, godine lete,
sada si zreo covjek, a
kao juce bio si dijete.

Prosao si put trnovit,
nekada manje, a nekada vise,
urezao zivot u tvoje srce i dusu
dogadjaje da bi mogla
i knjiga da se napise.

Kroz tvoj zivot prosli su ljudi
i dobri i losi i
svako od njih ostavio trag
u tebi.
Neki su prerano otusli,
neki su jos uvijek tu, a
ima i onih koje nikada pozelio sresti ne bi.

Sve je to zivot druze moj,
radovao si se, a i plakao nekada,
podnosio uvrede i ponizenja,
upadao u krize
i izlazio iz njih,
davao mnogo, a vracalo ti se malo i
u svemu tome najteze ti bilo
da budes i da ostanes svoj.

Sad u svojim godinama zrelim
u mislima se u samoci vracas unazad,
sjecas se djetinjstva, mladosti,
ljubavi, bolesti, radosti i tuge
i pitas se kako sve to brzo prodje
i jesi li mogao biti sudbine druge.

 

 

 

 

 

Nuajma Muratović, 2009.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Gračanica
MOJA DOMOVINA

Mislim, sanjam
o tebi…

Crtam, slikam
o tebi…

Rastem, dišem
sa tobom…

Smijem se, plešem
ja sa tobom…

Moja draga domovino…
Da, istina je!
Volim te!
…………………………….
MY HOMELAND

Thinking, dreaming
about you…

Drawing, painting
about you…

Growing, breathing
with you…

Smiling, dancing
me with you…

My dear homeland…
Yes, it’s true!
I love you!

 

 

 

 

 

Merima Hadžiaganović, 1987.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Gračanica (Soko)
USPORI ČOVJEČE

Uspori čovječe…
Stani !
Kud’ žuriš?
Sebi kaži !

Juriš k’o luđak,
za vjetrom nekog uspjeha.
Stalno negdje žuriš…
Nešto žudiš…
Moraš !
A vremena uvijek malo.

Uspori čovječe…
Predahni to duguješ sebi.
Vrijeme je mudro i čudno,
sijedi je to lisac koji hodi žurno,
vješto čuva budućnost k’o zlatno runo.

Uspori čovječe…
Koliko god žurio,
kroz olujne smetove jurio,
sudbina često svoje prste uplete,
kroz maglu k’o lopov planove odnese.
Košulja života počinje da stišće,
tek onda shvatiš da postojiš,
da će doći dan kad’ te neće biti više .

Zagrliš sudbinu sivu,
tvoja je …
Buku zamijeniš tišinom,
jer duša ti vapi za mirom.
Umorila se jadna,
da tvoje snove ganja,
prepustila krila vjetru,
da leti u vremenu .

Uspori čovječe…
Predahni to duguješ sebi,
ionako će te stići čas,
kad’ će nestat tvoj dah.
Rubin života kojeg si jurio,
prekrit će crni plašt zemlje,
i tebe više biti neće.

 

 

 

 

Medina Jašarević, 1995.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Gradačac
HUSEJNIJA

Hiljadu ezana sa bijele Husejinove džamije
Ne bi utišale zov srca
Jer hej, da mi je!

Da srce utiša razuma misli prkosne
Da ti koraci nađu put Kapije od Bosne
I bedemi sivi, što emocijama čuvaju stražu
Popuste, pa priznaš, srcu nećeš naći dražu.

I svi oklopni vozovi, sa ratnih šina
I sav pijesak pustinjskih dina
Da stanu, da hiljade meleka dove
Da ti bar nakratko dođem u snove.

I sahat kula, samo dvaput dnevno tačna
Čuje poj, kako se savija pjesma čežnje, beskonačna
Da te vidim, pa nek padne fasada smirenosti
Oči pristaju, pa nek su džehenemma vječiti gosti
I na kapiji dženneta i Hatidža i Aiša stoje
Meleci, da mi vrline, dobra djela broje
Ja prokleta sam, do određenog časa
Jer je sjećanje sve što ostaje, od tvoje ljubavi, tvog poštovanja, tvog glasa

 

 

 

 

Radomariola Čikić, 1991.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Gradiška
BIJELI SAN

Bila sam dijeva, u bijelom sva.
Sanjala sam san.
On je bio taj.
Bili smo srećni i dugovječni.

Ali tada zakuca duh prošlosti na vrata.
Crni gavran preleti preko neba
Tada me trgnu noćna mora.
To više nije san već java.

Izdade me dragi moj.
Prodade dušu moju.
Sad sam samo krhotina stakla.
Ne ogledalo ne djeva.
Već razbijeni parčići sna

 

 

 

 

 

Željana Cvjetković, 2008.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Gradiška (Rogolji)
ANĐELE

Kada oči zasuze
onda tada stvarno teško je ,
tada ne znam ni ništa, ni gdje
srce meni tada boluje.

Ono zadnje što me u životu održavalo
i moje greške podržavalo,
toga sada više nema,
bar nije sa mnom!

I gdje su sada svi
kad je meni najteže,
Da me tako zagrle
I kažu sve proći će!

Kao da je srce trnje pustilo
da je sve od mene odustalo,
Anđele zaslužujem li ovo?
Da li je ovo moje poglavlje novo?

Treba li da patim?
Zar ne zaslužujem sreće ni malo,
I da je nekome do mene stalo.

Tama me obuzela
I učinila svoje,
Deo mene je kaznila
A sad hoće i tvoje!

 

 

 

 

 

Branko Serdar, 1968.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Jajce
SPOZNAJA

Zagrizoh jabuku
iz radoznalosti
što uz osmjeh vijugajući tijelom
žena mi je dala.
Slatka je bila.

S gorkim okusom
na usnama
ovozemaljskim glibom
u grlu je nosim.

Goli i bosi i ja i žena
pogazismo zapovijed.
Potomci naši
kisele će jabuke gristi.

 

 

 

 

Ilda Arnautović, 1980.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Kakanj
PROCVJETALA PUSTINJA

O, kako su ljudi radoznali,
pitaju često, kome svoje
pjesme pišem?
Ko si, šta si, odakle si,
jesi li stvaran,
postojiš li negdje ti
Ili samo plod moje mašte si?

A ja šutim, i kroz njih gledam,
dok mi se pogled
u daljini gubi,
osmjehujem se jer znam
da samo rijetki osjetiti mogu
kako i mislima
može da se ljubi.

Eh, kad bi znali,
da moj si Aziz ti,
lutajući sanjar
što u bijeloj košulji
pustinjom hodi,
i da se sretosmo
nekad davno,
k’o glavni likovi
jednog romana,
pa od tog trena
“Slatko svetogrđe” tvoje,
milinom oplemeni
puste grudi moje.

Eh, kad bi znali da
moj Medžnun si ti,
što oganj vreli
u meni probudi,
i da mi pjesme pišeš i pjevaš,
a ja ti tepam:
“Hej, moj, pjesniče ludi…”

Ne znaju ljudi,
samo slute,
kako te svojim
rimama grlim ja
i da te skrivam u stihovima
Rumija, Hafiza,
Hajjama i Džamija…

I pitaju opet,
jesmo li se sreli u Perziji,
na brdovitom Balkanu
ili samo u mašti nas dvoje
i zašto baš Tebi, samo Tebi
posvećujem sve pjesme svoje?

Eh, kad bi znali svi,
da moj harf “Vav” si Ti,
i kako ljubav me tvoja okrijepi,
voda života sa usana tvojih
sjeme aška u meni natopi,
pa ono nabubri i proklija…

Eh, kad bi znali ljudi,
koliko sam Bogu zahvalna
što te imam ja…

Ne znaju ljudi,
da ja nekad bijah pustinja
koja od Tvoje ljubavi
oživi i procvjeta.

 

 

 

 

Bogdan Bunić, 1954.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Kotor Varoš/Zagreb
PUŠE LI VJETAR

Milijoni odsanjanih snova.
Silne želje mojih pradjedova.
Mnoge kladnje pšeničnih snopova.
Sve to nosi moja pjesma ova.

Sve što pišem sve je istinito.
Puše li vjetar Gajane djed pito ..
Ovršeno izređeno žito .
Bunića je ime plemenito.

Volim brda ,Zapotkraj,Presedo.
Volijo ih i moj striko Nego.
Divne priče o njima ispredo.
Zato i ja u pjesmu ih htjedo.

Nek sačuva moja poezija
Buniće ljeti kad sunce zasija.
Proljeće ,jesen ,a i zima prija.

U maju mi brda najmilija.
Milijone odsanjanih snova
pjevat će vam poezija ova .

 

 

 

 

 

Anđela Tomaš, 2003.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Kozarska Dubica (Knežica)
BUKOVSKI MOG VREMENA

Bio si mi
srećno mjesto,
privatna biblioteka
rezervisana samo
za moje potpetice,
otkucaje kazaljki
na mom satu
i dvije vinske čaše
u uglu pored
Kaporove Une
ili Nabokove Lolite.
Bio si izvor
moje sreće,
prosvjetljenje
moj tunel i san,
moja želja..
moj mir.
Jedan topao poziv
u kišovitoj jesenjoj noći.
Moj muzej umjetnosti
i moja umjetnost
koju niko nikada
nije uspio razoriti
niti pokoriti,
a razočarati, pak, da.
Jesen je,
sezona kiša
tvoje omiljeno.
Dobro, zar stvarno misliš
da mi nisi značio
da mi ništa nije značilo?
Zar si mislio
da sam te zaboravila,
zapostavila?
Dobro…
Zar si, stvarno, mislio
da si prolazan
u mom životu?
I da ću zaboraviti
tvoju omiljenu crnu boju,
noći na Kalemegdanu
bez mene,
doduše i bez tebe
jer si s nekim izgubio dušu,
ali ostavila sam ti svoju?!
Da ću zaboraviti
boje tvojih košulja,
imitacije na tvojim čarapama
tvoje zdravstveno stanje?
Bio si mi ljubav.

O tome šta sam ti bila,
(sada, kroz suze)
ne želim ni da pomislim.
Jer, možda bi me skrhalo.
Ali, meni si značio.

 

 

 

 

 

Dženita Memić, 1996.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Lukavac (Dobošnica)
EGO

Dok pijem jutarnju kafu iz novina virka ego
Na ulici ispod nogu škripi mali ego
Na obližnjem butiku, u odrazu ogledala guta me očima
Ko si pa ti?
I ja ne znam ko sam
Krade mi lik

U prijevozu ego mrmlja naglas tiha ogovaranja sredine
Slušam muziku, mislim…
Gledam kako kuće nestaju, mislim…
Ali uklesan u temelje istih šiklja sa visokih krovova oduzimajući mi dijapazon

Na stanici gospodin ulazi glasno
Otvara ego i plaća željenu stanicu
Glamurozan ego šuška debeo papir ispod prstiju
Buka traje duže od predviđenog
Iz ega je nikla

Guram se kroz masu ega dok moj strši
Ne odgovara na postavljena pitanja jer uvijek pita
Ulazim u dimenziju osam sati ega
Proučavam vrste i divim se jednoj, svojoj

Na parkingu nervozni čiko prijeti tužbom za kašnjenje
Prijetnja je upućena u nepoznatom smjeru dok ego curi iz ušiju
Među prašnjavim knjigama, razbacanim stolovima obezvrijeđenog rada

Na vrata ulazi prosijed čiko kojem živčani sustav viri iz očiju isprobavajući glasne žice pred prisutnim življem
Riječ Bog u svakoj antireligijskoj rečenici
Više puta ponovljena
I figurativna batina dok ego hrani nesvijest

Na gradskom korzou žena u crnom promatra ženu u crvenom
Do smjene uloga ne može doći, ako i mora
Promlja: “Kakve flundre hodaju gradom”.
Ego se nasmiješi i ode
Vratim traku unazad svega što je bilo
Konačno gasim zadnje svjetlo
I pitam se, hoće li zaspati i ego?
………………………………………
EGO

While I’m drinking my morning coffee from the newspaper, my ego is buzzing
A small ego is creaking underfoot on the street
At a nearby boutique, in the reflection of the mirror, he swallows me with his eyes
Who are you?
I don’t know who I am either
He’s stealing my character

In transport, the ego mutters aloud the quiet gossip of the environment
I’m listening to music, I think…
I watch the houses disappear, I think…
But carved into the foundations of the same gushes from the high roofs, taking away my range

At the station, the gentleman enters loudly
Opens the ego and pays for the desired station
The glamorous ego rustles the thick paper under its fingers
The noise lasts longer than expected
It came from the ego

I push through the mass of egos while mine sticks out
He doesn’t answer the questions because he always asks
I am entering the dimension eight hours of the ego
I study species and admire one, my own

In the parking lot, a nervous uncle threatens to sue for being late
The threat is directed in an unknown direction as the ego drips from the ears
Among dusty books, scattered tables of devalued work

A gray-haired man enters the door, whose nervous system protrudes from his eyes, testing his vocal cords in front of the living creatures present
The word God in every anti-religious sentence
Repeated several times
And a figurative beating while the ego feeds the unconscious

On the city corso, a woman in black watches a woman in red
A change of roles can’t happen, even if it has to
Just she says: “What kind of squirrels are walking around the city”.
Ego smiles and leaves
I rewind everything that was
I finally turn off the tail light
And I wonder, will the ego also fall asleep?

 

 

 

 

Magdalena Jović, 2003.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Milići
PROLJEĆNE IGRE

Na tvoj jesenji maskenbal
došla sam obučena u proljeće.
U svilenoj, nježnožutoj haljini
sa ogrtačem od bijelih rada i ljubičica.
U raspletenoj dugoj kosi
skrivali su mi se sunčevi zraci,
Koji su ostavljali trag
kuda god bih prošla.
Igrala sam najljepše proljećne igre
dok su me svi tako čudno gledali.

Na tvoj jesenji maskenbal, svi ostali,
pa i ti, došli su u tmurnim bojama.
Sporo su hodali
vukući teške kišne oblake za sobom.
Tužni i umorni.
Ostavljeni.
Jer su u jesen svi u kući
ili se sele na jug.

Na tvoj jesenji maskenbal
došla sam jednom,
Pokušavajući da svima u srce zasadim
neki vjesnik proljeća,
Ali ne mogu ljubičice da rastu
na konstantnoj kiši.

Na tvoj jesenji maskenbal više neću ići.
S razlogom su jesen i proljeće
mjesecima razdvojeni.

 

 

 

 

 

Razija Maksumić, 1970.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Mostar
PISMO

Ko jato ptica
godine mlade u visine odletješe!
Prođoše nezapaženo ko nepoznata lica,
I sada me ponekad zateče misao
– ne da li te veze više ima već da li je ikada bješe!

Ne, ne! Ne dugujemo si ništa
osim ono čime smo rođenjem zaduženi
Pa ako ne razumiješ moj jezik i osjećaje moje
– onda nismo ništa ni ja tebi ni ti meni!

Jučer je već pohranjeno u uspomenama,
a budući dani samo u nadanjima postoje!
Ako dođeš danas bit ćeš blagodat,
bit će milost poput ljetne kiše
što zalijeva stoljetna stabla
na kojima dozrijeva ime moje i tvoje!
Jer šta je to lijepa riječ što se k’o med s jezika toči
I sve blago svijeta – šta je!?
I bliska krv što našim venama kruži!?
Čemu!? – ako nemaš osjećaje!?

 

 

 

 

 

Srđan Novković, 1990.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Petrovac (Drinić)
GAŠENJE RAJA…

Stvoriće čovek pakao sebi
I samog đavola po potrebi
Vatru i oganj ljuti
I plamen žuti.

Stvoriće sebi uslove vruće
Ostaće bez imanja i kuće

Stvoriće uslove te
Da mu zavide sile sve
Zavideće mu i đavo sami
Što čami u tami.

I iz pakla devetog kruga
Čovjek će postati svojoj
nepromišljenosti sluga
Postaće rob volje svoje
Ogluši će se, Bože, na reči tvoje.

Plamen i vatra i na vrhu dim
Dičiće se sa tim
Sve dok ne nestane čistoga zraka
Čovjek će glumiti ludaka

Nestaće i šume i drveće svo
Nestaće blagostanje ovo.
Nestaće i ptice što cvrkuću u letu
Nestaće i životinja u svetu

Ostaće samo pepeo i dim
Prekriven bojama crnim
I po koja kukavica na sinjoj grani
Da nas poseti kakvi su bili rajski dani.

 

 

 

 

Karla Begić, 2004.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Posušje
SVIJEĆA

palim tu već istrošenu svijeću
mamljivog mirisa
u staklenci dubokoj bez dna

mirisala je na proljetne ruže
odajući strast
lice mi je u veselje presvlačila
dušu u vječni mir

i uvijek iznova isti osjećaj
i svakom danu bila je
početak i kraj
i kao božanstvo voljena

ponovo, palim tu gotovo istrošenu svijeću
i već vidim da je na samom dnu,
nedodirljiva

a takva je bila i tvoja duša
tako krasna i vesela
i tako lako napuštala
ostavljajući me u neizlaznoj agoniji
pjesmi suza
i praznoći

 

 

 

 

Rijad Memić, 1993.
Bosna i Hercegovina , Sarajevo
DJEČAK

Možda bih trebao zakopati ruke
da više ne mogu pisati.
Možda bih trebao
glavu svoju u potoku vina ugušiti,
da um svoj zarobim u pijanom viru.

Grotesne slike između rebara mojih
stvaraju sliku o tebi,
o kojoj ne smijem da govorim.
Sanjam da sam plovio iznad velikih.

Sam sam sebi tajna, kolika sam laž.
Smijala si se mojim grijesima,
ispred mene bacala oštro,
ja sam gazio, želeći iskupljenje.

Iskupljenje.
Za ono
što sam bio.
Što jesam.
Što ću ostati.

Mrtvac sam koji nosi zlatno runo
moje ruke kriju kišu.
Moja pleća su crne rupe.
Na grobu pisat će mi “Dječak”.

 

 

 

 

Nikola Motika, 1995.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Sarajevo
LJUBAV, TI I JA

Sjenke po zidovima ponovo izvode
svoj nesvakidašnji ples, soba nije prazna,
u ritmu dobovanja kiše i misli mi
lutaju, srce mi zaigra,
pomislim na nas, sve smo mogli mi, a
idalje možemo, svaki ukus ima svoju priču,
ljubav je zarazna,
ti i ja, najmanja rijeka sa najviše mostova
i vječni olimpijski grad, slučajnost, ne bih rekao,
skupa hodamo dugom šetnicom, uzajamno
povjerenje je jezgra.

Heretičan je i blasfemičan svijet,
treba se čuvati, okolu sve su
vjernici fanatici, pakao se sprema,
drugi pričaju o nama, šta i kako treba,
određuju nam sudbinu, a niko ih ne pita,
ubiše se pričajući i pišući, jesmo li
jedno za drugo, nije na njima da to
određuju, za sretan život kreće priprema,
obožavaju da guraju nos u tuđe,
bez potrebe, pustite nas na miru,
naša realnost je bajkovita.

Ljubav, ti i ja, i niko drugi na svijetu,
ništa drugo nije toliko važno kao to
da smo zajedno,
voljeti je privilegija, a to između nas je
Afroditin čin i puno joj hvala,
koliko se ljudi međusobno mrze, čudo jedno,
transfer blama zbog njihovog ponašanja,
toliko je jadno i bijedno,
cijenim sve ljude koji uđu u moj život,
makar samo prošli kroz njega,
ostavili su bar pelcer za sljedeće,
sudbina mi ih je darovala.

Idemo skupa naprijed i odolievamo
izazovima drugih,
iz prve ruke znam šta sam sve sam
prošao, nikad nisam igrao na sigurno
i iskustvom sam platio,
danak neiskustva ili ispečen zanat,
rezultate donosi ta neka luda vjera
u sebe i u najbolji mogući ishod,
stojim na raskrsnici sudbine, brzo mi
teku dani, a od neizdrža poludih,
svako svakog zna i svako o tom
nekom nešto zna, duhovna i umna
kontaminacija, “sila Boga ne moli”,
da rješim, posla sam se uhvatio.

Živimo u životnoj zajednici namjerno,
na očigled svih, suprotstavljamo
im se iz inata,
šetamo hodnicima sjećanja, sjedimo i
razmišljamo o zajedničkoj budućnosti,
gledajući se kradom, ophrvani nadom,
ne mogu da otjeram one koji dolaze,
niti da zadržim one koji odlaze,
bez argumenata,
mislim se o tome, prkosimo im ljubeći se, grleći se,
u nezdravoj sredini pred svima,
ljubim tvoje usne od marcipana, gledam
oči tvoje boje kestena dok se tvoj miris
crvene ruže širi gradom.

 

 

 

 

Amna Mulić, 2002.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Sarajevo
SARAJEVSKI OKTOBAR

Ne diraj mi grad u jesen
kad se mala djeca sapliću kroz opalo lišće na Vilsonovom šetalištu
i kad galebovi opet kao u proljeće slijeću na ciglenu Miljacku.

Ne diraj ni slučajno jer tad je najljepši
onda kada ni dan nije prekratak
ni noć preduga
nije toliko hladno da izvadimo ruke iz džepova
i držimo se dok prolazimo kroz užurbanu masu
Ferhadijom
kad još uvijek ima svježeg cvijeća po ulicama
i miriše sve jače i oštrije.

Ne diraj mi jesen u gradu
opet ima dovoljno sunca
ali kad me ljubiš ledi nam se dah
dok pokušavam ugrijati promrzle prste na tvojoj vratnoj arteriji
tiho ti šapućem kao najveću tajnu
da je oktobar najtopliji mjesec
u godini.

 

 

 

 

Esma Lukač Muratović, 1956.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Sarajevo (Ilidža)
STARIMO BEZ DA SMO SVJESNI

Kada vam se u starosti lice izbora, na čelo napravi brazde
nemojte žaliti za takvom starošću, jer vasa duša blista,
život neka vam postaje uspomena, gdje je živjela savjest čista
na malim stvarima se uči da postaneš čovjek pravi
a velike zanemari, jer kako čovjek stari sve mu više sitnica fali.

Dok živiš u ljudima postaješ sve više ljudina, u ljutskim grudima
vatra ne bukti u kremenu kao ni dobra duša u vremenu postojanja,
ako te ne proguta crvena bobica gorkog okusa, bez fokusa,
u lubenicu zdrave kore, a truhlog sadržaja,
odijelo na čovjeku tijelo bez preobražaja u čovjeka.

Sve dok kujete dobra djela za ljude, neće da se čude odakle ste došli,
ne bojte se vatre I vode, ne bojte se čovjek je zaista jak kao zemlja,
drši ga savjest I čast, dobrota jest dobar glas u svome džematu,
prostire se miruhom u svim dolinama u sjaju, miru I ratu
dok slava grije vam srce, pokličom časti I živite za ljude.

Ti kruno prirode, hodajuće blago zvano insan,
koji nisi rođen za sebe, već za druge pored sebe tu baš stojiš,
nemoj kratiti pamet da bi ti jezik rastao, u brlog zarastao od bijesa
i dok stariš I stariš sve dublje ulaziš u grijeh ako nemaš u duši mir,
grabite velike prilike, pred Svetiteljem nema pridike, ispit se polaže.

 

 

 

 

 

Asja Vreto, 2013.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Sarajevo (Ilidža)
MOJA SEKA

Kaže meni mala seka
nemoj biti luda ti.
Daj mi sada taj telefon,
pa će biti mirni svi.

Želi ona na Tik Tok,
malo Roblox, malo Minecraft.
Stalno oči iskolači.
Kad se počne ona „Fightat“.

Roditelji jadni trpe,
ne žele je vidjet tužnu.
Mada ona na taj način
stvara neku sliku ružnu.

Borba moja tako traje.
Neću da sam babaroga.
O igrici ovisna je,
pa ja moram biti stroga.

Zato svima pišem sada.
Ne živite za „likove“.
Od igrica nema fajde
Zato vani sada hajde.

 

 

 

 

Edima Efendić Džinić, 1971.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Tuzla
NEKOJ DRUGOJ INES

Nije Ines vrijeme košava
da slisti sa zemlje radost,
vatra da sprži sjećanja
na vječitu inspiraciju
kako se voli.

Ljubav je oronula u lošim
stihovima,
predala se materijalizmu
bez osjećaja za vrlinu.

Padaju oni koji su tako voljeli
pamtili, zapisali svaki tvoj korak.

Predugo živimo opčinjeni
glupostima,
sve je samo ne život
jednostavan.

Ne tuguj Ines,
postala si druga žena
nanovo rođena
u nekoj drugoj ljubavnoj
pjesmi.
E Ines…

Ostani zauvijek mlada, godinama.

 

 

 

 

Alma Imamović, 1978.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Tuzla
TI

Ti, koji imaš najnježnije ruke na svijetu
i najtopliji glas koji je srce ledeno otopio i do ništavila ogolio.
Ti koji imaš najljepši osmijeh pred kojim sam poražena bila i bez borbe se tebi predala.

Ti, koji si me probudio iz dubokog sna i otvorio sva vrata koja su čvrsto zaključana stajala.
Tebi poklanjam svaki stih i svu ljubav ovog svijeta.

Neka ništa za mene ne ostane, koliko god sam sebe tebi dala, malo je.

Ti, pred čijim pogledom sam drhtala kao list na vjetru, od čijeg dodira sam se topila i nestajala.
Ti kojeg sam voljela i kad nisam htjela.
Zauvijek sam uz tebe i s tobom ostala.

Ti, koji si znao da moje srce samo tebi pripada i da ništa na svijetu nisam željela kao tebe,
tada i sada.
Ti, koji si sve znao i bez straha iza sebe ljubav ostavio.

 

 

 

 

 

Darjan Minov, 1991.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Tuzla
PREKRASNI MECI (KIJEVSKI SAN)

Za J.K.

Prekrasni meci plešu iznad tvoje glave
Prekrasne granate ti diraju usne
Prekrasni vojnici sade cvijeće po tvojim grudima

Ideš noću
U krevet od tijela
Kriješ lice u postelji krvi

Mir je tu gdje sam ja
Ali ne mogu da zaspim
Kad znam da tvoje žarke boje
Prljaju krici

Prekrasne bombe ti drže ruke
Prekrasne čizme ti crtaju obrve
Prekrasni tenkovi češljaju kosu

Budiš se u February
U paklu koji nisi stvorio
Pjevaš o majci i starim pričama

Rat je tu gdje si ti
Ali ti spavaš čvrsto
Znaš da tvoj san o slobodi
Tek dolazi

Sve dok ti sanjaš
Ja sanjam s tobom
………………………………………
BEAUTIFUL BULLETS (A KYIV DREAM)

For J.K.

Beautiful bullets dancing over your head
Beautiful grenades touching your lips
Beautiful soldiers planting flowers on your breasts

You go at night
To a bed of bodies
To bury your face in sheets of blood

It is peace where I am
But I cannot sleep
Knowing your bright colours
Are stained by cries

Beautiful bombs holding your hands
Beautiful boots drawing your eyebrows
Beautiful tanks brushing your hair

You woke up in February
In a hell you never made
And you sing of mother and tales of old

It is war where you are
But you sleep firm
Knowing your dream of freedom
Will come true

For as long as you dream
I dream with you

 

 

 

 

 

Iman Duvnjaković, 2000.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Tuzla
TVOJE BORE SMIJALICE

Ko su Apolon i Afrodita
pored tvojih bora smijalica?

Nek’ mi Zeus prosti
što nabasah na tebe,
a Kronos nek’ zaboravi
ukradeno vrijeme
i produži nam noći
i nedjeljna jutra.

Kafa se već i odviše kuha
dok nam “čitaš sudbu”
u flekama iste.
Eros užurbano piše
dok kriviš lice u poguban smijeh…

Zaista, ko su Apolon i Afrodita
pored tvojih bora smijalica.

 

 

 

 

 

Lukas Nikolić, 2004.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Tuzla (Breške)
ZAČEPITE, KASNO JE!

Na Vrbanja mostu sedam dana su ležali,
leševi. Mrtvi.
Jedno pored drugog, njezina ruka na njegovom srcu.
Drugi su prolazili, gledali, šutjeli.
Tek bi se koji zalutali golub sa Baščaršije sažalio nad njima,
zapjevao odu žalosnu, pustio izmet.
I dalje su odzvanjali ispaljeni metci,
čuli njihovi krici, smijeh vojnika.
Vojnika koji su, samo, činili svoju dužnost.
Ali mi ne čujemo!
I dalje.
Mi prolazimo, gledamo, šutimo.
Kao da se ništa desilo nije.
Zvijeri!
Šutimo!
Šutimo!
Jer smo ih mi ubili.
Jer šutimo.
Zvijeri!
Stavljamo maske, glumimo karnevale.
Ne poznajemo vlastitog druga,
okrećemo leđa od prijatelja,
pljujemo po komšijama, po susjedima.
Zašto, zvijeri?
Jer šutimo.
Jer nisu kao mi.
Jer nisu naši.
A čiji su?
Nisu, valjda, njihovi?
Čekaj, trenutak!
Tko ste vi?
Tko su oni?
Tko si ti?
Šuti. Samo šuti.
Nastavi klimati glavom.
Potrči! Pobježe ti stado.
Kliker ti udario u glavu.
Pohlepa, mržnja, zavist, ljubomora –
neke nove vrijednosti, jebeno vrijeme.
Uzvišene nacije, arijevske rase.
Prošlost kuca na vrata.
Šuti! Otvori!
Niko te ništa nije pitao.
Stavi masku, trči . . .
Kao da se ništa dogodilo nije.
Zvijeri!
Pa, dobrodošao!
Ne, ne, ne dajte se vi omesti.
Slobodno, nastavite.
Šutjeti.
Ludo radovanje.
Uzaludno, bolje rečeno.
Zvijeri!
Nastavite šutjeti, ovdje, na nepravdu, na zločin, na rat.
Takvima su sigurno vrata raja širom otvorena!
Nastavite vrtjeti kukovima pod palicom velikih dirigenata,
slijediti njihove ideje, o otadžbini, snazi, zajedništvu.
Trčite tamo gdje vjetar puše – manje je otpora.
Zvijeri!
Šutim! Šutiš! Šuti!
Šutimo! Šutite! Šute!
Što smo htjeli, to smo i dobili.
Jebe nas ko’ stigne.
Jer šutimo.
Začepite, kasno je!
Zvjeri!
Uživajmo sada, u plodovima naše šutnje.
Jedimo izmet golubova, pjevamo pod šibicom dirigenata.
Začepi gubicu!
Šuti!
Osmi je dan leševe odnio komunalac,
krv saprala kiša, a buku smirila pjesma vojnika.
Vojnika koji su, samo, činili svoju dužnost.
Mi niti smo što čuli, niti vidjeli.
Nama je samo rečeno, da mi ovdje šutimo.
Pa ipak, nismo mi ljudi, mi smo tek obične zvijeri.
U boj!

 

 

 

 

Derviša Sarajlija (Dena), 1962.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Velika Kladuša
OPROŠTAJ

I kad sve u meni utihne
Osmjeh sa lica isčezne
I kada se misao u prošlisti zaledi
Samo će ljubav u meni živjeti
Sve dok se srce ne smrzne

Jedino što ću slušati moći
Biti će tvoj dodir što mi kroz vene svira
Usnama pjesmu nijemu ću pjevati
A čuti ćeš je samo ti i zvijezde u noći

Poželjeti ću oproštaj mnogima dati
Iako mi tužno sjećanje nadire
Suznu fontanicu ću iz oka pustiti
Koja jedino iz čovjeka izvire

 

 

 

 

 

Riada Tabić, 1972.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Vogošća
PREDOSJEĆAJ

Osjećam
da pukla je nit od svile
kojom smo snove tkali
od ovo malo života
zrno ljepote krali.
Osjećam
kako srce tvoje
sklada neku neznanu melodiju
sve mi se čini
da naša ljubav liči na parodiju.
Osjećam
da ledi mi se krv
grize me
užasne sumnje crv.
Osjećam
da blizu je kraj
da gasne naše zvijezde sjaj.
Osjećam
da mraka tog se bojim,
osjećam
da još te jako volim.

 

 

 

 

Kristina Kojić, 2001.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Vukosavlje
TRANSFUZIJA DUŠE

Vraćam se odmah
s druge strane ulice,
a ti čuvaj naša sjećanja
u pijesku vremena.

Vrijeme koje ne prolazi
samo je anomalija u razlistavanju života.

Ubijaj pažljivo
zrake čežnje
i tiho razgovaraj s tišinom.

Ja se odmah vraćam.

 

 

 

 

Edna Pinjić, 2003.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Zavidovići (Donji Kovači)
IZVINI ZBOG PJESME

naši vrhovi prstiju
koji su bili u kratkom spoju su umrli prvi,
za mene je zatim umrla zelena,
a nakon nje i smeđa boja,
onda su zaboli nož na mjesto
gdje smo se prvi put poljubili,
grickanje moje duše je uvijek bilo podmuklo,
kao dijete bijesno od samoće
koje ključem grebe haubu auta,
nikada ti nisam pričala,
ali nalazimo se na desetom mjestu u svijetu
na listi najnerazvijenih zemalja u ljubavi,
prema statistici
jedino su nigerija i gana nerazvijenije,
broj zaljubljenih je stotinu hiljada,
zaostajemo u ljubavi, kao da negdje prednjačimo
od svih, osam stotina i četrnaest
samo je beznadežno zaljubljeno,
nas tu nema, nikada nas i nije bilo,
uvijek smo se nalazili
negdje suprotno frontalnoj kosti,
na mjestu gdje srčani zalisci otkazuju
i oba kažiprsta pucaju od uzbuđenja,
tamo gdje se ja odričem
džamonjine treće smrti,
ivana iz hadersfilda,
fuketovog golfa i smrti sidranovog hamze,
suncokreta i sladoleda od vanilije,
te činjenice da je lav kralj životinja,
nikada mi nisi rekao,
a nije da sam pitala,
šta da radim sa tolikim ranama,
mržnjom prema politici
i gdje nalaziš pravo da film
koji počinje kao ljubavna priča,
pretvaraš u yamato,
ti si otišao i svi su odjednom počeli umirati,
poremetio sve solarne pleksuse
i dao povoda drugima
da vezu naš kraj,
jer si kod njih ti još uvijek neko moj

 

 

 

 

Mehrima Omerdić, 1988.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Zenica
PROLJEĆE

Pada kiša.
Palim cigaru.
Kap po kap odzvanja
Po granama i beharu
Miriše mokra zemlja
Pupoljci glave dižu
Laste na grane slijeću
Jedna po jedna se nižu
Palim još jednu cigaru
I posmatram mali cvijetak
Proljeće tiho se šunja
Kao nada za novi početak.

 

 

 

 

Alem Isaković (Artiste), 1990.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Zenica
LUNA

Sunce u sutonu
Sklanja svoje skute
Nebo prostrano
Širom otvara pute
Namrštenoj lopti
Što tamu bije
Viju vuci
I more se buni
Što princ stade
Nasred prostrana
Neba
Poput trona
I miran
U spokoju svome
Ogrne bedra
Oblacima od pamuka
Tek rijetko
Nasmiješi brke
Na sve mravlje muke
Što se noću
Množe uz jauke

 

 

 

 

 

Šejla Isabegović, 2002.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Živinice
MOJ ŽIVOT U KOLICIMA

Zivot u kolicima je lijep,
Ali meni mnogo tezak,
Tezak je i sam po sebi,a i zbog svih prepreka na koje nailazim,
Zivot nekada zna biti jako mracan i tuzan,
A u isto vrijeme moze biti i suncan,ako smo dovoljno jaki da sve to izdrzimo i podnesemo,
Ja sam snazna i hrabra i zelim biti kao djevojka svaka,
Zelim biti osoba koja ce da motiviše sve ljude oko sebe,
Zivot u kolicima je tako jako neuobicajan i nepredvidljiv,jer nikada ne znamo sta ce nam se dogoditi u datom trenutku,
Ali kada nas zivot sroza ostaje nam proza.

 

 

 

 

Anes Poljić, 2005.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Živinice (Priluk)
MJESEC I JA

Hej ti!
Pogledaj te zvijezde gore,
pogledaj kako plamte po
beskonačnom nebu.
Pogledaj tu njihovu magiju,
tu njihovu ljubav i ljepotu

Ja kada ih pogledam
pitam se,
zašto nisam i ja zvijezda?
Pa da imam i ja nekoga,
nekoga ko će svake noći da me gleda
a ja da mu uzvratim najljepšim sjajem.

Onda gledam sve te odbjegle planete
Pa zar nešto može tako da ti oduzme dah.
A opet ja , neko tako mali,
sa snovima vecim od svemira.
A taj jedan san, koji je isti svake noći,
gubitak moje najvoljenjje zvijezde
mog mira i slobode
moje najvece ljubavi.

Ali sada kada najviše boli,
i kad je sve uništeno.
Ja opet imam mjesec
da sa njim dijelim
bar djelić te naše priče,
da plačem i da molim
Bože nek me bar ne poriče.

 

 

 

 

 

Azra Begić, 2007.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Živinice (Priluk)
MUČENJE

Rekao je:
“ tvoje oči su
Pola tvoje ljepote”.

Život je ironija.

Iskopala sam svoje oči,
i i dalje sam ga vidjela.

 

 

 

 

Selma Salihović, 2002.
Bosna i Hercegovina, Živinice (Tupković)
SOBA PAKLA

Nemoj da staješ na oronule podove,
nemoj da riskiraš zbog mene.
Ne stavljaj ruku svoju
u to mastilo crno,
nećeš ga više skinuti.
Ne dozvoli osjećajima
da ostanu u ustima,
zagušit će te vremenom.
Prevali preko jezika taj zalogaj riječi.
Ne prepuštaj se olujama,
nećeš imati više moći nad njima.
Ne zagrli svoju ljusku, taj oklop,
jer pustiti ga više nećeš moći.
Ne predaji srce svoje mračnim odajama,
poslije neće znati izlaza naći.
Ne dozvoli da ratove vodiš sa razumom,
porazit ćeš sam sebe,
bez i da osjetiš.
Palit će se milioni alarma,
ali vidjeti ih nećeš moći.
Ne zatvaraj se u mračne zatvore,
izlaza nećeš naći.
Zidovi su gluhi,
dozivati ćeš,
ali samo će tvoji glasovi odjekivati.
Shvatiti ćeš da horor živiš,
samo tvoj nije pred publikom.
Ne idi u te sobe,
gdje se stanarina plaća životom,
a kao nagradu dobijaš
smrt bez povratka.
I ne pitaj mene
kako znam ovo sve …

Objava Mili Dueli 2023 – Bosna i Hercegovina (Poezija i književne kritike) pojavila se prvi puta na Mili Dueli.

]]> https://milidueli.com/2023/06/23/mili-dueli-2023-bosna-i-hercegovina-poezija-i-knjizevne-kritike/feed/ 0 13468 MILI DUELI 2020/21: Semi-final results – DUEL 15 – Europe (Non-Balkan Countries) https://milidueli.com/2021/08/11/mili-dueli-2020-21-semi-final-results-duel-15-europe-non-balkan-countries/ https://milidueli.com/2021/08/11/mili-dueli-2020-21-semi-final-results-duel-15-europe-non-balkan-countries/#respond Wed, 11 Aug 2021 15:37:54 +0000 https://milidueli.com/?p=10846 Mili Duels 2020 (8th season) had 739 entries from 52 countries. It is the largest and most popular online poetry contest in this area, which for the 8th year in a row brings together poets…

Objava MILI DUELI 2020/21: Semi-final results – DUEL 15 – Europe (Non-Balkan Countries) pojavila se prvi puta na Mili Dueli.

]]> Mili Duels 2020 (8th season) had 739 entries from 52 countries. It is the largest and most popular online poetry contest in this area, which for the 8th year in a row brings together poets from the region, and lately from around the world. Mili Dueli is headquartered in Jajce, Bosnia and Herzegovina. The purpose of the contest is to encourage intercultural dialogue among artists from the Balkans and the world. Being one of the most sensitive regions in the world with a turbulent past, the aim of the contest is to build bridges of culture and mutual respect between the once war-torn areas.

The contest is traditionally composed of 5 elimination rounds. In each round, the number of authors decreases, and in the last, Fifth round, the winner is decided by a voting system based on the Eurovision Song Contest scoring system. The main responsible person of the contest is Nermin Delić, the idea creator and organizer of the contest. For 8 years in a row, Mili Dueli have been gathering authors and spreading the influence of poetry in everyday life.

Nermin Delić

Briefly about the First Round: The selection of all received applications (739) was performed by Nermin Delić. The organizer selected 476 authors for presentation in the Second Round.

Briefly about the Second Round: After the selection in the First Round by the organizer of the contest, Nermin Delić, 476 authors were selected and presented in the Second Round. In the Second Round, the authors are classified in 12 duels, according to the countries they come from. Due to the number of participants, Bosnia and Herzegovina had 2 duels (DUEL 1, DUEL 2), and Serbia 3 (DUEL 3, DUEL 4, DUEL 5). Croatia, Montenegro, North Macedonia and Bulgaria had one duel each (DUEL 6, DUEL 7, DUEL 8, DUEL 9). Due to the small number of participants, authors from Albania, Greece, Kosovo, Romania and Slovenia were presented in one duel (DUEL 10). Poets with Balkan roots, but with current residence outside the Balkans, are grouped together in one duel (DUEL 11). In the end, all authors coming from non-Balkan countries are grouped into one duel (DUEL 12).

The beginning of the presentation of the duel on the official Facebook profile of Mili Dueli was on July 12, 2020. Duels are presented in order, every 2-3 or 4 days according to the scope of the duel. For the first 15 days from the presentation of the duel, the followers of Mili Dueli were able to vote in the comments by entering the author’s number below the picture where her/his poem is presented. In addition to the readers, the members of the jury, composed of 12 renowned and important for Mili Duel artists from the Balkans, also voted. They selected 90% of the authors to pass to the Third Round. The other 10% is intended for the votes of the readers, for those who were not selected by the jury, and who have the great support of their friends and companions Mili Dueli.

Briefly about the Third Round: In the third round, the selection of the best authors continued and only the TOP 100 best authors had the opportunity to continue.

Briefly about the Fourth Round: The fourth round is brought by the TOP 50 best authors who pass to the final, fifth round. It is composed of a total of 16 duels.

You can see more about the Fourth Round (how it is voted, how it is organized) here:

Mili Dueli 2020: Organization Of The Fourth Round

FOURTH ROUND (SEMI-FINALS)

RESULTS

First of all, an important announcement … In the fourth round, we were looking for the 50 best authors according to the procedure established by the organization of the competition. Looking at the results, as the Organizer, I realized that in certain duels, the authors were much more dominant, and that surely many more authors deserved to pass, at least according to the presentation in the semifinals. For that purpose, I decided that the number of authors who go directly further should be 36, and that a total of 34 authors should fight for the remaining 14 places. All those authors who did not go directly further will equally send the poem for the finals, but only 14 of them will be presented, based on the quality of the submitted poem and the accompanying video material that traditionally adorns our Finals. More about everything, certainly below …

DUEL 15 –  EUROPE (NON-BALKAN COUNTRIES)

 Voting Order: 1. NERMIN DELIĆ (Organizer) 2. ANĐELA TURUKALO (Mentor) 3.  DANJA GAŠPAR ĐOKIĆ (Additional Jury Member)     4. ZDRAVKO ODORČIĆ (Additional Jury Member)  5. LJUBICA PETROVIĆ KOSOR (Additional Jury Member)  6. ENEA HOTIĆ (Additional Jury Member)  7. SIMO GOLUBOVIĆ (Additional Jury Member)   8. FACEBOOK VOTES (1st column – total likes author’s poem got; 2nd column – likes from our followers; 3rd column – No. of poem views) 9. INSTAGRAM VOTES (1st column – No. of poem views; 2nd column – No. of likes poem got)

 

WHAT’S NEXT? (PREPARATION FOR THE FINALS)

DARK BLUE. Authors who entered the TOP 50 directly! These authors are officially the finalists of this season, therefore, participants in the last round of Mili DuelI 2020/21. From this moment on, they need to contact their mentors and start preparing the poem for the Finals. All details related to the preparation and sending of the poem for the Finals will be received in a private message in the inbox. Please be patient!

LIGHT BLUE. – Authors who has chance to participate in the finals, the last round of Mili Duels 2020/21. These are authors who did not go directly to the final round, but due to the fantastic performance in the semifinals, the Organizer decided to give a new opportunity to promote their poetry. There are a total of 34 of them in such a situation, and 14 of them will be participants in the Finals. The decision will be made by the Organizer based on their application for the Finals. From this point on, they can also contact their mentors and start preparing a poem for the Finals.

TOP 100 – Authors who remained in the TOP 100 and did not make it to the Mili Dueli 2020 Finals. Their contribution to the spread of the project and poetry will be rewarded by receiving electronic recognition for their participation as they represented their countries in a bright light (TOP 100 from 739 registered !!!), and will accordingly receive recognition for the intercultural dialogue of the Balkan countries and the countries of the world in which they participated.

All the presented poems will be represented in a electronic collection which, apparently, will have its own printed edition (summer, 2021), when MILI DUELI BALKAN TOUR awaits us. More on that soon!

Also, all authors who are 2000 or younger will be presented at the MILI DUEL JUNIOR ONLINE POETRY CONTEST which will start a few days after the end of the eighth season of Mili Duels 2020 – Online Balkan Poetry Contest!

 

JURY COMMENTS

Organizer: NERMIN DELIĆ

nermin delic

Dear friends,

First of all, thank you for showing the greatest sense of loyalty to the whole project this season. The Corona-year prolonged the contest itself, and at the same time some of my private achievements happened (I finished university and started working), so the time spent on the project was reduced to a certain extent. Either way, our play through poetry continued, and so in these wonderful summer days we had the opportunity to read the 100 most representative authors we had so carefully selected.

In this, the fourth and at the same time penultimate round, we had the opportunity to enjoy the poetry of all Balkan countries, but also many countries around the world. Somewhere it turned out to be good that there was longer voting time than in previous seasons. Looking at the number of views of all the semi-final poems, with 328,492 views on Facebook, my mission was already fulfilled. Looking at the countries that read us, I could not stop, if I started to list … Almost 330,000 times we entered the everyday life of people on social media with poetry… I noticed at the beginning that there were two camps among the authors; one who enthusiastically welcomed the publication of their poem and those who did not promote their poetry even to their friends. The former shared the same with their friends, because for the first time, somewhere in our region, people can vote for poetry; for the first time it was important to point out that you have passed the selection of 739 authors and you are one step closer to the end, exclusively with your poetry. Because this was not an invitation to like the conquest of handbags, irons, shelves, etc., this was an invitation to the world of poetry in which each of these 100 great authors lives!. But probably everyone had their reasons for being one and not the other, and from that point of view it certainly can’t be a complaint. I rewarded some of the poems, even though they had poor readability, because they are masterful in themselves!

Just led by a mass of people who wrote me every day who they were voting for, shared your poems so beautifully and decorated their Facebook walls, I didn’t want to conflict my opinion with the opinion of the masses. But points always say it all. So in this case. I started to comment and went in order, all in order to write as good and clear comments as possible, WHY such points. But then I finally realized that in most cases the same mistake, the same comment, was written only in different words.

Therefore, I decided to point out in general the following …

When submitting a poem, to any contest, anywhere, even where you are already sure that the poem will be published, awarded, or generally given some recognition, please take note of the following:

  1. LITERACY. There were so many mistakes that turned me away from some nice emotions I felt while reading your poems. If you’re a writer, that doesn’t mean you have to be computer-wise and orthographically perfect, but if you’re sending a poem somewhere, to someone, let it be viewed with other eyes as well; maybe someone who knows maybe less than you will know something more about certain things. It is this item that is crucial in depriving the spirit of amateurism that a writer can carry within himself. Four-dot in poems, spaces several times, unnecessary punctuation marks in the wrong places; all of which violates the RHYTHM and AESTHETIC VALUES and, ultimately, the GENERAL IMPRESSION of the poem. If you make me take a break in the wrong place with a comma, that thread that runs the poem will break, and I will remain confused. I have to admit that these mistakes were greatly reduced, as a team of mentors worked with the authors, but there were authors who submitted their poems without a mentor and where such mistakes were noticed.
  2. WORK WITH A MENTOR. This item may be crucial, as it involves collaboration on the selection and / or correction of a semi-final poem. It’s not just a conversation about a poem, it’s a conversation of two cultures, often two peoples, and you were representatives of your own. The basis of any peace is acquaintance, cooperation and compromise.
    We did not take it as evil if an author, in the words of his mentor, still insisted on being “according to him”, but it is a completely wrong form not to respect the form of the contest that requires cooperation, therefore, not to contact his mentor at all, not to greet him.
    My impression is certainly complemented by the opinion of my colleagues, members of the jury, and your mentors, and in this regard we are looking for a person who will be a part of us in the next season of the contest.
  3. OPINION OF READERS / YOUR FRIENDS. We should never primarily be guided by the number of likes and reviews that one author has achieved on the social network, because then the competition part would mean a struggle for numbers, and not for the quality of the poem. However, I am of the opinion that on this occasion as well, through the number of votes cast, you showed two things; first – how much you actually care about going through; the second – how much support you can actually collect for your poetry. I note that for the first time it is a vote for poetry, where free votes decide who will be the winner. In this regard, I rewarded all the authors who heartily presented their poem.
  4. POETIC VALUE OF THE TEXT. Many of the texts in the verse that are sent are often not clarified as poetry, so it was necessary to point out to the authors what is poetic and what is not in their poems. Judging subjectively, the original metaphors and comparisons are something I admired the most, because they impress the most. The most common example I give to everyone is this: if it was written IT WAS COLD it has less poetic value than IT WAS ICE, where in the same sense, a metaphor is introduced. If someone writes IT WAS WHITE LIKE SNOW, which is expected, clichéd and outdated, it will certainly be less impressive than IT WAS WHITE LIKE A NEEDLE HOUSE.
    When it comes to rhyming poems, rhymes should not be surpassed and expected. Here, too, the use of new poetic words and their skillfully found rhymes was appreciated. Of course, no one should invent hot water, but every step out of everyday life was considered a success.
  5. AESTHETIC VALUE OF THE TEXT. Applications submitted for the semifinals were to be complete. Any answer to the questions related to the biography and the general impression of the author about the contest was evaluated. Also, the poem itself was supposed to be completely computer-correct. It is extremely unnecessary to point out grammatical / spelling mistakes to someone in this round of the competition, because every such mistake is a sign of the author’s lack of dedication to the text and work with a mentor.
  6. GENERAL IMPRESSION. The authors have sent poems in the previous three rounds, too. It is also, a significant factor that influenced the distribution of my points.

Opinions from other Jury members:

Their mentor, Anđela Turukalo said:

“This group was such a pleasant surprise, while being one of the hardest to grade- alongside Bulgaria. So, well done. It was nothing but the shades that made a difference between grades here, especially if we’re talking about the upper part of the chart.

Jana Orlova… It’s a lovely, powerful miniature. I love it. So short, yet intense enough to create a movie before my eyes. It does have depth and it’s meaningful. So, very well done.

Michela Zanarella… Again: short, powerful and meaningful. That’s what I like when it comes to poems: when they make the reader feel and remember that feeling. The ending is very good.

Gloria Sofia… This poem is good. I see the talent of this writer and I’m completely satisfied with it. Yet, the choice for the semi-final round wasn’t exactly perfect. This subject is a bit pale compared to others in the group. Motives are good, everything is good- but not impressionable enough.

Lucilla Trapazzo… Probably the best poem in one of the best groups of the semi-final. It’s socially engaged- which I absolutely love in poetry. Yet, the very scene is projected unto us with such a lovely poetic expression… Pictures, emotions, contrasting parts (to make it more lively), attitude- everything is here. And, perfectly executed. So, well done and good luck.

Eliza Segiet… A good miniature. Precise, punctual, with a clear meaning and a message. I truly like it. Yet, since it’s the semi-final round, I guess the choice could be better. This group called for something stronger, more memorable, something more intrusive…

Alexandra Mantsevoda… This poem has some interesting moments, interesting verses… Yet, it feels too ‘caged’. There’s too many rules here, especially with rhyming, which are suffocating the poem. For me, it’s way more important to feel the wild emotion, the restless energy in the poem. Rules are there to be broken- but in a good way and with a good taste. This way, the poem seems constrained and therefore weaker.

Yurij Lischuk… I appreciate the environmental activism in this poem. Poetry, as every other form of art, should be used to help the creator share his attitude and opinions, not just his inner feelings about people etc. There aren’t many writers who actually do this, so this made me happy. Also, I like it. I like the expression, I like the motives. I like everything about this one. I would maybe criticize the anger which is bursting throughout the poem (because I never appreciate if emotions prevail over the writer’s main goal), but even that anger is a critique of our society- therefore, it’s required here. Well done.

Ivanna Samchuk… Very emotional and very touching. I love the gentle touch of melancholy here. The ending is lovely. It’s a very good poem, indeed. Yet, as I said earlier, it’s the details that count here and this group had some very powerful poems- and this one simply didn’t stand out enough.

Emi Endqkova… Another very touching, emotional poem. I do believe that this poem would be better with some minor changes, but we didn’t have time to discuss that… It just needed a ‘boom’ part, nothing more. Anyway, I do like it- but it needs more work.

Juljana Mehmeti… Very well done. This poem really brings a special set of emotions and not so often seen motives. I don’t see anything that could be improved here, really. It’s a good poem. Not perfect, but very very good.

Tomas Waginger… Well written. It’s very descriptive and charming. I love it, but I do think the ending could be better: it probably needed something unexpected or something intriguing to make it whole. Anyway, I’m happy with it: it’s pleasant and comfortable… Like a night melody.”

You can read poems by European authors here:

Mili Dueli 2020/21: Poezija evropskih (nebalkanskih) autora (Polufinale)

Mili Dueli
Mili Dueli Copyrights

MILI DUELI 

Made in Bosnia and Herzegovina
by Nermin Delić

Europe / Balkan Peninsula
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Central Bosnia Canton
Jajce Town 70202

Sva prava zadržana. // All rights reserved.

Objava MILI DUELI 2020/21: Semi-final results – DUEL 15 – Europe (Non-Balkan Countries) pojavila se prvi puta na Mili Dueli.

]]> https://milidueli.com/2021/08/11/mili-dueli-2020-21-semi-final-results-duel-15-europe-non-balkan-countries/feed/ 0 10846 MILI DUELI 2020/21: Semi-final results – DUEL 10 – Romania https://milidueli.com/2021/08/10/mili-dueli-2020-21-semi-final-results-duel-10-romania/ https://milidueli.com/2021/08/10/mili-dueli-2020-21-semi-final-results-duel-10-romania/#respond Tue, 10 Aug 2021 15:24:27 +0000 https://milidueli.com/?p=10753 Mili Duels 2020 (8th season) had 739 entries from 52 countries. It is the largest and most popular online poetry contest in this area, which for the 8th year in a row brings together poets…

Objava MILI DUELI 2020/21: Semi-final results – DUEL 10 – Romania pojavila se prvi puta na Mili Dueli.

]]> Mili Duels 2020 (8th season) had 739 entries from 52 countries. It is the largest and most popular online poetry contest in this area, which for the 8th year in a row brings together poets from the region, and lately from around the world. Mili Dueli is headquartered in Jajce, Bosnia and Herzegovina. The purpose of the contest is to encourage intercultural dialogue among artists from the Balkans and the world. Being one of the most sensitive regions in the world with a turbulent past, the aim of the contest is to build bridges of culture and mutual respect between the once war-torn areas.

The contest is traditionally composed of 5 elimination rounds. In each round, the number of authors decreases, and in the last, Fifth round, the winner is decided by a voting system based on the Eurovision Song Contest scoring system. The main responsible person of the contest is Nermin Delić, the idea creator and organizer of the contest. For 8 years in a row, Mili Dueli have been gathering authors and spreading the influence of poetry in everyday life.

Nermin Delić

Briefly about the First Round: The selection of all received applications (739) was performed by Nermin Delić. The organizer selected 476 authors for presentation in the Second Round.

Briefly about the Second Round: After the selection in the First Round by the organizer of the contest, Nermin Delić, 476 authors were selected and presented in the Second Round. In the Second Round, the authors are classified in 12 duels, according to the countries they come from. Due to the number of participants, Bosnia and Herzegovina had 2 duels (DUEL 1, DUEL 2), and Serbia 3 (DUEL 3, DUEL 4, DUEL 5). Croatia, Montenegro, North Macedonia and Bulgaria had one duel each (DUEL 6, DUEL 7, DUEL 8, DUEL 9). Due to the small number of participants, authors from Albania, Greece, Kosovo, Romania and Slovenia were presented in one duel (DUEL 10). Poets with Balkan roots, but with current residence outside the Balkans, are grouped together in one duel (DUEL 11). In the end, all authors coming from non-Balkan countries are grouped into one duel (DUEL 12).

The beginning of the presentation of the duel on the official Facebook profile of Mili Dueli was on July 12, 2020. Duels are presented in order, every 2-3 or 4 days according to the scope of the duel. For the first 15 days from the presentation of the duel, the followers of Mili Dueli were able to vote in the comments by entering the author’s number below the picture where her/his poem is presented. In addition to the readers, the members of the jury, composed of 12 renowned and important for Mili Duel artists from the Balkans, also voted. They selected 90% of the authors to pass to the Third Round. The other 10% is intended for the votes of the readers, for those who were not selected by the jury, and who have the great support of their friends and companions Mili Dueli.

Briefly about the Third Round: In the third round, the selection of the best authors continued and only the TOP 100 best authors had the opportunity to continue.

Briefly about the Fourth Round: The fourth round is brought by the TOP 50 best authors who pass to the final, fifth round. It is composed of a total of 16 duels.

You can see more about the Fourth Round (how it is voted, how it is organized) here:

Mili Dueli 2020: Organization Of The Fourth Round

FOURTH ROUND (SEMI-FINALS)

RESULTS

First of all, an important announcement … In the fourth round, we were looking for the 50 best authors according to the procedure established by the organization of the competition. Looking at the results, as the Organizer, I realized that in certain duels, the authors were much more dominant, and that surely many more authors deserved to pass, at least according to the presentation in the semifinals. For that purpose, I decided that the number of authors who go directly further should be 36, and that a total of 34 authors should fight for the remaining 14 places. All those authors who did not go directly further will equally send the poem for the finals, but only 14 of them will be presented, based on the quality of the submitted poem and the accompanying video material that traditionally adorns our Finals. More about everything, certainly below …

DUEL 10 –  ROMANIA

Voting order:1. NERMIN DELIĆ (Organizer)   2. ANĐELA TURUKALO (Mentor)  3. DANJA GAŠPAR ĐOKIĆ(Additional Jury Member)  4. SIMO GOLUBOVIĆ(Additional Jury Member) 5. LELA ZJAJO (Additional Jury Member)  6. MILČO MISOSKI (Additional Jury Member) 7. ZDRAVKO ODORČIĆ  (Additional Jury Member) 8. FACEBOOK VOTES (1st column – total likes author’s poem got; 2nd column – likes from our followers; 3rd column – No. of poem views) 9. INSTAGRAM VOTES (1st column – No. of poem views; 2nd column – No. of likes poem got)

 

 

WHAT’S NEXT? (PREPARATION FOR THE FINALS)

DARK BLUE. Authors who entered the TOP 50 directly! These authors are officially the finalists of this season, therefore, participants in the last round of Mili DuelI 2020/21. From this moment on, they need to contact their mentors and start preparing the poem for the Finals. All details related to the preparation and sending of the poem for the Finals will be received in a private message in the inbox. Please be patient!

LIGHT BLUE. – Authors who has chance to participate in the finals, the last round of Mili Duels 2020/21. These are authors who did not go directly to the final round, but due to the fantastic performance in the semifinals, the Organizer decided to give a new opportunity to promote their poetry. There are a total of 34 of them in such a situation, and 14 of them will be participants in the Finals. The decision will be made by the Organizer based on their application for the Finals. From this point on, they can also contact their mentors and start preparing a poem for the Finals.

TOP 100 – Authors who remained in the TOP 100 and did not make it to the Mili Dueli 2020 Finals. Their contribution to the spread of the project and poetry will be rewarded by receiving electronic recognition for their participation as they represented their countries in a bright light (TOP 100 from 739 registered !!!), and will accordingly receive recognition for the intercultural dialogue of the Balkan countries and the countries of the world in which they participated.

All the presented poems will be represented in a electronic collection which, apparently, will have its own printed edition (summer, 2021), when MILI DUELI BALKAN TOUR awaits us. More on that soon!

Also, all authors who are 2000 or younger will be presented at the MILI DUEL JUNIOR ONLINE POETRY CONTEST which will start a few days after the end of the eighth season of Mili Duels 2020 – Online Balkan Poetry Contest!

 

JURY COMMENTS

Organizer: NERMIN DELIĆ

nermin delic

Dear friends,

First of all, thank you for showing the greatest sense of loyalty to the whole project this season. The Corona-year prolonged the contest itself, and at the same time some of my private achievements happened (I finished university and started working), so the time spent on the project was reduced to a certain extent. Either way, our play through poetry continued, and so in these wonderful summer days we had the opportunity to read the 100 most representative authors we had so carefully selected.

In this, the fourth and at the same time penultimate round, we had the opportunity to enjoy the poetry of all Balkan countries, but also many countries around the world. Somewhere it turned out to be good that there was longer voting time than in previous seasons. Looking at the number of views of all the semi-final poems, with 328,492 views on Facebook, my mission was already fulfilled. Looking at the countries that read us, I could not stop, if I started to list … Almost 330,000 times we entered the everyday life of people on social media with poetry… I noticed at the beginning that there were two camps among the authors; one who enthusiastically welcomed the publication of their poem and those who did not promote their poetry even to their friends. The former shared the same with their friends, because for the first time, somewhere in our region, people can vote for poetry; for the first time it was important to point out that you have passed the selection of 739 authors and you are one step closer to the end, exclusively with your poetry. Because this was not an invitation to like the conquest of handbags, irons, shelves, etc., this was an invitation to the world of poetry in which each of these 100 great authors lives!. But probably everyone had their reasons for being one and not the other, and from that point of view it certainly can’t be a complaint. I rewarded some of the poems, even though they had poor readability, because they are masterful in themselves!

Just led by a mass of people who wrote me every day who they were voting for, shared your poems so beautifully and decorated their Facebook walls, I didn’t want to conflict my opinion with the opinion of the masses. But points always say it all. So in this case. I started to comment and went in order, all in order to write as good and clear comments as possible, WHY such points. But then I finally realized that in most cases the same mistake, the same comment, was written only in different words.

Therefore, I decided to point out in general the following …

When submitting a poem, to any contest, anywhere, even where you are already sure that the poem will be published, awarded, or generally given some recognition, please take note of the following:

  1. LITERACY. There were so many mistakes that turned me away from some nice emotions I felt while reading your poems. If you’re a writer, that doesn’t mean you have to be computer-wise and orthographically perfect, but if you’re sending a poem somewhere, to someone, let it be viewed with other eyes as well; maybe someone who knows maybe less than you will know something more about certain things. It is this item that is crucial in depriving the spirit of amateurism that a writer can carry within himself. Four-dot in poems, spaces several times, unnecessary punctuation marks in the wrong places; all of which violates the RHYTHM and AESTHETIC VALUES and, ultimately, the GENERAL IMPRESSION of the poem. If you make me take a break in the wrong place with a comma, that thread that runs the poem will break, and I will remain confused. I have to admit that these mistakes were greatly reduced, as a team of mentors worked with the authors, but there were authors who submitted their poems without a mentor and where such mistakes were noticed.
  2. WORK WITH A MENTOR. This item may be crucial, as it involves collaboration on the selection and / or correction of a semi-final poem. It’s not just a conversation about a poem, it’s a conversation of two cultures, often two peoples, and you were representatives of your own. The basis of any peace is acquaintance, cooperation and compromise.
    We did not take it as evil if an author, in the words of his mentor, still insisted on being “according to him”, but it is a completely wrong form not to respect the form of the contest that requires cooperation, therefore, not to contact his mentor at all, not to greet him.
    My impression is certainly complemented by the opinion of my colleagues, members of the jury, and your mentors, and in this regard we are looking for a person who will be a part of us in the next season of the contest.
  3. OPINION OF READERS / YOUR FRIENDS. We should never primarily be guided by the number of likes and reviews that one author has achieved on the social network, because then the competition part would mean a struggle for numbers, and not for the quality of the poem. However, I am of the opinion that on this occasion as well, through the number of votes cast, you showed two things; first – how much you actually care about going through; the second – how much support you can actually collect for your poetry. I note that for the first time it is a vote for poetry, where free votes decide who will be the winner. In this regard, I rewarded all the authors who heartily presented their poem.
  4. POETIC VALUE OF THE TEXT. Many of the texts in the verse that are sent are often not clarified as poetry, so it was necessary to point out to the authors what is poetic and what is not in their poems. Judging subjectively, the original metaphors and comparisons are something I admired the most, because they impress the most. The most common example I give to everyone is this: if it was written IT WAS COLD it has less poetic value than IT WAS ICE, where in the same sense, a metaphor is introduced. If someone writes IT WAS WHITE LIKE SNOW, which is expected, clichéd and outdated, it will certainly be less impressive than IT WAS WHITE LIKE A NEEDLE HOUSE.
    When it comes to rhyming poems, rhymes should not be surpassed and expected. Here, too, the use of new poetic words and their skillfully found rhymes was appreciated. Of course, no one should invent hot water, but every step out of everyday life was considered a success.
  5. AESTHETIC VALUE OF THE TEXT. Applications submitted for the semifinals were to be complete. Any answer to the questions related to the biography and the general impression of the author about the contest was evaluated. Also, the poem itself was supposed to be completely computer-correct. It is extremely unnecessary to point out grammatical / spelling mistakes to someone in this round of the competition, because every such mistake is a sign of the author’s lack of dedication to the text and work with a mentor.
  6. GENERAL IMPRESSION. The authors have sent poems in the previous three rounds, too. It is also, a significant factor that influenced the distribution of my points.

Opinions from other Jury members:

Their mentor, Anđela Turukalo said:

“Camelia Monica Cornea… This poem contains fluttery motives, which contributes to dreamy and vivid impression. I find this poem quite interesting, since the tone goes from playful- at the start, to dramatic- at the very end; while it flows smoothly and elegant.

Danu Florentina…This poem is quite a picturesque miniature, it’s pleasant, with interesting wordplay in one verse. I like it, but I feel like it lacks a bit of depth, or at least a bit of strength.

Mariana Eftimie Kabbout… This is a classic poem, quite punctual. I love the first two strophes, but the ending is not perfect. It calls for something firmer, stronger… Something that could finish the poem with a bang. This way, it’s not bad but it does not give the complete effect that, with a bit of effort, it could.

Laura Ionescu… I see the talent here, but it needs more work. The ideas are very good, motives are fine, it’s creative; but the very shape of the poem and it’s structure… It’s troublesome. The writer is still quite young, so I know she can make it perfect if she continues to work on her own growth as a poet. Read more, write more and good luck.”

Lela Zjajo said:

“CAMELIA MONICA CORNEA – CAMELIA MONICA CORNEA – Obviously, this author has a penchant for beautiful written words. When it comes to the poetry in the poem he introduces himself to us, I notice that there is a lot, a lot of great material to write two or even three poems out of this one offered. The poem is written with a mixture of thoughts, rather unfinished and meaningless from a multitude of extraordinarily thought-out words, but the poem, so crowded, has lost its meaning. In the end, I would recommend a more meaningful way or at least a more specific theme, plot, dynamics or rhythmicity of the song. It would be a shame to ruin this talent only with selected words and make a song out of a song. For the Semifinals, this was overly brave.

FLORENTINE DAY – DEW WEDDING – Very beautiful miniature. The author’s wise move. Short and very sweet.

MARIANA EFTIMIE KARABOUT – THE TREE OF MY BIRTH – An attractive poem.

LAURA IONESCU – I don’t accept poetry worthwhile if we just ask ourselves through the poem. Too many questions, nowhere with answers. Poetry should rest and not burden us.”

Simo Golubović said:

“This is a poem. This is life more than a poem. It amazes the way of thinking, enchants with metaphors, intoxicates the rhythm. Topics very interesting, everyday and age-old, ideas sublime, way of telling very good. I have the impression that in some places the translation (actually a translation) is more successful than the original or it is so good because of the influence and actions of the mentor. It’s hard to judge, but the lyrics are amazing, especially the first poem.
Congratulations to the organizer, participants, translators, mentors …”

You can read poems by Romanian authors here:

Mili Dueli 2020/21: Poezija rumunskih autora (Polufinale)

Mili Dueli
Mili Dueli Copyrights

MILI DUELI 

Made in Bosnia and Herzegovina
by Nermin Delić

Europe / Balkan Peninsula
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Central Bosnia Canton
Jajce Town 70202

Sva prava zadržana. // All rights reserved.

Objava MILI DUELI 2020/21: Semi-final results – DUEL 10 – Romania pojavila se prvi puta na Mili Dueli.

]]> https://milidueli.com/2021/08/10/mili-dueli-2020-21-semi-final-results-duel-10-romania/feed/ 0 10753 MILI DUELI 2020/21: Semi-final results – DUEL 9 – Kosovo https://milidueli.com/2021/08/10/mili-dueli-2020-21-semi-final-results-duel-9-kosovo/ https://milidueli.com/2021/08/10/mili-dueli-2020-21-semi-final-results-duel-9-kosovo/#respond Tue, 10 Aug 2021 15:05:30 +0000 https://milidueli.com/?p=10747 Mili Duels 2020 (8th season) had 739 entries from 52 countries. It is the largest and most popular online poetry contest in this area, which for the 8th year in a row brings together poets…

Objava MILI DUELI 2020/21: Semi-final results – DUEL 9 – Kosovo pojavila se prvi puta na Mili Dueli.

]]> Mili Duels 2020 (8th season) had 739 entries from 52 countries. It is the largest and most popular online poetry contest in this area, which for the 8th year in a row brings together poets from the region, and lately from around the world. Mili Dueli is headquartered in Jajce, Bosnia and Herzegovina. The purpose of the contest is to encourage intercultural dialogue among artists from the Balkans and the world. Being one of the most sensitive regions in the world with a turbulent past, the aim of the contest is to build bridges of culture and mutual respect between the once war-torn areas.

The contest is traditionally composed of 5 elimination rounds. In each round, the number of authors decreases, and in the last, Fifth round, the winner is decided by a voting system based on the Eurovision Song Contest scoring system. The main responsible person of the contest is Nermin Delić, the idea creator and organizer of the contest. For 8 years in a row, Mili Dueli have been gathering authors and spreading the influence of poetry in everyday life.

Nermin Delić

Briefly about the First Round: The selection of all received applications (739) was performed by Nermin Delić. The organizer selected 476 authors for presentation in the Second Round.

Briefly about the Second Round: After the selection in the First Round by the organizer of the contest, Nermin Delić, 476 authors were selected and presented in the Second Round. In the Second Round, the authors are classified in 12 duels, according to the countries they come from. Due to the number of participants, Bosnia and Herzegovina had 2 duels (DUEL 1, DUEL 2), and Serbia 3 (DUEL 3, DUEL 4, DUEL 5). Croatia, Montenegro, North Macedonia and Bulgaria had one duel each (DUEL 6, DUEL 7, DUEL 8, DUEL 9). Due to the small number of participants, authors from Albania, Greece, Kosovo, Romania and Slovenia were presented in one duel (DUEL 10). Poets with Balkan roots, but with current residence outside the Balkans, are grouped together in one duel (DUEL 11). In the end, all authors coming from non-Balkan countries are grouped into one duel (DUEL 12).

The beginning of the presentation of the duel on the official Facebook profile of Mili Dueli was on July 12, 2020. Duels are presented in order, every 2-3 or 4 days according to the scope of the duel. For the first 15 days from the presentation of the duel, the followers of Mili Dueli were able to vote in the comments by entering the author’s number below the picture where her/his poem is presented. In addition to the readers, the members of the jury, composed of 12 renowned and important for Mili Duel artists from the Balkans, also voted. They selected 90% of the authors to pass to the Third Round. The other 10% is intended for the votes of the readers, for those who were not selected by the jury, and who have the great support of their friends and companions Mili Dueli.

Briefly about the Third Round: In the third round, the selection of the best authors continued and only the TOP 100 best authors had the opportunity to continue.

Briefly about the Fourth Round: The fourth round is brought by the TOP 50 best authors who pass to the final, fifth round. It is composed of a total of 16 duels.

You can see more about the Fourth Round (how it is voted, how it is organized) here:

Mili Dueli 2020: Organization Of The Fourth Round

FOURTH ROUND (SEMI-FINALS)

RESULTS

First of all, an important announcement … In the fourth round, we were looking for the 50 best authors according to the procedure established by the organization of the competition. Looking at the results, as the Organizer, I realized that in certain duels, the authors were much more dominant, and that surely many more authors deserved to pass, at least according to the presentation in the semifinals. For that purpose, I decided that the number of authors who go directly further should be 36, and that a total of 34 authors should fight for the remaining 14 places. All those authors who did not go directly further will equally send the poem for the finals, but only 14 of them will be presented, based on the quality of the submitted poem and the accompanying video material that traditionally adorns our Finals. More about everything, certainly below …

DUEL 9 –  KOSOVO

Voting order: 1. NERMIN DELIĆ (Organizer) 2. SARAH ISUFI (Mentor) 3. ANĐELA TURUKALO (Additional Jury Member) 4. MILČO MISOSKI (Additional Jury Member) 5. LELA ZJAJO (Additional Jury Member) 6. ZDRAVKO ODORČIĆ (Additional Jury Member) 7. DANJA GAŠPAR ĐOKIĆ (Additional Jury Member) 8. FACEBOOK VOTES (1st column – total likes author’s poem got; 2nd column – likes from our followers; 3rd column – No. of poem views) 9. INSTAGRAM VOTES (1st column – No. of poem views; 2nd column – No. of likes poem got)

WHAT’S NEXT? (PREPARATION FOR THE FINALS)

DARK BLUE. Authors who entered the TOP 50 directly! These authors are officially the finalists of this season, therefore, participants in the last round of Mili DuelI 2020/21. From this moment on, they need to contact their mentors and start preparing the poem for the Finals. All details related to the preparation and sending of the poem for the Finals will be received in a private message in the inbox. Please be patient!

LIGHT BLUE. – Authors who has chance to participate in the finals, the last round of Mili Duels 2020/21. These are authors who did not go directly to the final round, but due to the fantastic performance in the semifinals, the Organizer decided to give a new opportunity to promote their poetry. There are a total of 34 of them in such a situation, and 14 of them will be participants in the Finals. The decision will be made by the Organizer based on their application for the Finals. From this point on, they can also contact their mentors and start preparing a poem for the Finals.

TOP 100 – Authors who remained in the TOP 100 and did not make it to the Mili Dueli 2020 Finals. Their contribution to the spread of the project and poetry will be rewarded by receiving electronic recognition for their participation as they represented their countries in a bright light (TOP 100 from 739 registered !!!), and will accordingly receive recognition for the intercultural dialogue of the Balkan countries and the countries of the world in which they participated.

All the presented poems will be represented in a electronic collection which, apparently, will have its own printed edition (summer, 2021), when MILI DUELI BALKAN TOUR awaits us. More on that soon!

Also, all authors who are 2000 or younger will be presented at the MILI DUEL JUNIOR ONLINE POETRY CONTEST which will start a few days after the end of the eighth season of Mili Duels 2020 – Online Balkan Poetry Contest!

 

JURY COMMENTS

Organizer: NERMIN DELIĆ

nermin delic

Dear friends,

First of all, thank you for showing the greatest sense of loyalty to the whole project this season. The Corona-year prolonged the contest itself, and at the same time some of my private achievements happened (I finished university and started working), so the time spent on the project was reduced to a certain extent. Either way, our play through poetry continued, and so in these wonderful summer days we had the opportunity to read the 100 most representative authors we had so carefully selected.

In this, the fourth and at the same time penultimate round, we had the opportunity to enjoy the poetry of all Balkan countries, but also many countries around the world. Somewhere it turned out to be good that there was longer voting time than in previous seasons. Looking at the number of views of all the semi-final poems, with 328,492 views on Facebook, my mission was already fulfilled. Looking at the countries that read us, I could not stop, if I started to list … Almost 330,000 times we entered the everyday life of people on social media with poetry… I noticed at the beginning that there were two camps among the authors; one who enthusiastically welcomed the publication of their poem and those who did not promote their poetry even to their friends. The former shared the same with their friends, because for the first time, somewhere in our region, people can vote for poetry; for the first time it was important to point out that you have passed the selection of 739 authors and you are one step closer to the end, exclusively with your poetry. Because this was not an invitation to like the conquest of handbags, irons, shelves, etc., this was an invitation to the world of poetry in which each of these 100 great authors lives!. But probably everyone had their reasons for being one and not the other, and from that point of view it certainly can’t be a complaint. I rewarded some of the poems, even though they had poor readability, because they are masterful in themselves!

Just led by a mass of people who wrote me every day who they were voting for, shared your poems so beautifully and decorated their Facebook walls, I didn’t want to conflict my opinion with the opinion of the masses. But points always say it all. So in this case. I started to comment and went in order, all in order to write as good and clear comments as possible, WHY such points. But then I finally realized that in most cases the same mistake, the same comment, was written only in different words.

Therefore, I decided to point out in general the following …

When submitting a poem, to any contest, anywhere, even where you are already sure that the poem will be published, awarded, or generally given some recognition, please take note of the following:

  1. LITERACY. There were so many mistakes that turned me away from some nice emotions I felt while reading your poems. If you’re a writer, that doesn’t mean you have to be computer-wise and orthographically perfect, but if you’re sending a poem somewhere, to someone, let it be viewed with other eyes as well; maybe someone who knows maybe less than you will know something more about certain things. It is this item that is crucial in depriving the spirit of amateurism that a writer can carry within himself. Four-dot in poems, spaces several times, unnecessary punctuation marks in the wrong places; all of which violates the RHYTHM and AESTHETIC VALUES and, ultimately, the GENERAL IMPRESSION of the poem. If you make me take a break in the wrong place with a comma, that thread that runs the poem will break, and I will remain confused. I have to admit that these mistakes were greatly reduced, as a team of mentors worked with the authors, but there were authors who submitted their poems without a mentor and where such mistakes were noticed.
  2. WORK WITH A MENTOR. This item may be crucial, as it involves collaboration on the selection and / or correction of a semi-final poem. It’s not just a conversation about a poem, it’s a conversation of two cultures, often two peoples, and you were representatives of your own. The basis of any peace is acquaintance, cooperation and compromise.
    We did not take it as evil if an author, in the words of his mentor, still insisted on being “according to him”, but it is a completely wrong form not to respect the form of the contest that requires cooperation, therefore, not to contact his mentor at all, not to greet him.
    My impression is certainly complemented by the opinion of my colleagues, members of the jury, and your mentors, and in this regard we are looking for a person who will be a part of us in the next season of the contest.
  3. OPINION OF READERS / YOUR FRIENDS. We should never primarily be guided by the number of likes and reviews that one author has achieved on the social network, because then the competition part would mean a struggle for numbers, and not for the quality of the poem. However, I am of the opinion that on this occasion as well, through the number of votes cast, you showed two things; first – how much you actually care about going through; the second – how much support you can actually collect for your poetry. I note that for the first time it is a vote for poetry, where free votes decide who will be the winner. In this regard, I rewarded all the authors who heartily presented their poem.
  4. POETIC VALUE OF THE TEXT. Many of the texts in the verse that are sent are often not clarified as poetry, so it was necessary to point out to the authors what is poetic and what is not in their poems. Judging subjectively, the original metaphors and comparisons are something I admired the most, because they impress the most. The most common example I give to everyone is this: if it was written IT WAS COLD it has less poetic value than IT WAS ICE, where in the same sense, a metaphor is introduced. If someone writes IT WAS WHITE LIKE SNOW, which is expected, clichéd and outdated, it will certainly be less impressive than IT WAS WHITE LIKE A NEEDLE HOUSE.
    When it comes to rhyming poems, rhymes should not be surpassed and expected. Here, too, the use of new poetic words and their skillfully found rhymes was appreciated. Of course, no one should invent hot water, but every step out of everyday life was considered a success.
  5. AESTHETIC VALUE OF THE TEXT. Applications submitted for the semifinals were to be complete. Any answer to the questions related to the biography and the general impression of the author about the contest was evaluated. Also, the poem itself was supposed to be completely computer-correct. It is extremely unnecessary to point out grammatical / spelling mistakes to someone in this round of the competition, because every such mistake is a sign of the author’s lack of dedication to the text and work with a mentor.
  6. GENERAL IMPRESSION. The authors have sent poems in the previous three rounds, too. It is also, a significant factor that influenced the distribution of my points.

 

You can read poems by Kosovo authors here:

Mili Dueli 2020/21: Poezija kosovskih autora (Polufinale)

Mili Dueli
Mili Dueli Copyrights

MILI DUELI 

Made in Bosnia and Herzegovina
by Nermin Delić

Europe / Balkan Peninsula
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Central Bosnia Canton
Jajce Town 70202

Sva prava zadržana. // All rights reserved.

Objava MILI DUELI 2020/21: Semi-final results – DUEL 9 – Kosovo pojavila se prvi puta na Mili Dueli.

]]> https://milidueli.com/2021/08/10/mili-dueli-2020-21-semi-final-results-duel-9-kosovo/feed/ 0 10747 MILI DUELI 2020/21: Semi-final results – DUEL 7 – Albania https://milidueli.com/2021/08/10/mili-dueli-2020-21-semi-final-results-duel-7-albania/ https://milidueli.com/2021/08/10/mili-dueli-2020-21-semi-final-results-duel-7-albania/#respond Tue, 10 Aug 2021 13:12:35 +0000 https://milidueli.com/?p=10703 Mili Duels 2020 (8th season) had 739 entries from 52 countries. It is the largest and most popular online poetry contest in this area, which for the 8th year in a row brings together poets…

Objava MILI DUELI 2020/21: Semi-final results – DUEL 7 – Albania pojavila se prvi puta na Mili Dueli.

]]> Mili Duels 2020 (8th season) had 739 entries from 52 countries. It is the largest and most popular online poetry contest in this area, which for the 8th year in a row brings together poets from the region, and lately from around the world. Mili Dueli is headquartered in Jajce, Bosnia and Herzegovina. The purpose of the contest is to encourage intercultural dialogue among artists from the Balkans and the world. Being one of the most sensitive regions in the world with a turbulent past, the aim of the contest is to build bridges of culture and mutual respect between the once war-torn areas.

The contest is traditionally composed of 5 elimination rounds. In each round, the number of authors decreases, and in the last, Fifth round, the winner is decided by a voting system based on the Eurovision Song Contest scoring system. The main responsible person of the contest is Nermin Delić, the idea creator and organizer of the contest. For 8 years in a row, Mili Dueli have been gathering authors and spreading the influence of poetry in everyday life.

Nermin Delić

Briefly about the First Round: The selection of all received applications (739) was performed by Nermin Delić. The organizer selected 476 authors for presentation in the Second Round.

Briefly about the Second Round: After the selection in the First Round by the organizer of the contest, Nermin Delić, 476 authors were selected and presented in the Second Round. In the Second Round, the authors are classified in 12 duels, according to the countries they come from. Due to the number of participants, Bosnia and Herzegovina had 2 duels (DUEL 1, DUEL 2), and Serbia 3 (DUEL 3, DUEL 4, DUEL 5). Croatia, Montenegro, North Macedonia and Bulgaria had one duel each (DUEL 6, DUEL 7, DUEL 8, DUEL 9). Due to the small number of participants, authors from Albania, Greece, Kosovo, Romania and Slovenia were presented in one duel (DUEL 10). Poets with Balkan roots, but with current residence outside the Balkans, are grouped together in one duel (DUEL 11). In the end, all authors coming from non-Balkan countries are grouped into one duel (DUEL 12).

The beginning of the presentation of the duel on the official Facebook profile of Mili Dueli was on July 12, 2020. Duels are presented in order, every 2-3 or 4 days according to the scope of the duel. For the first 15 days from the presentation of the duel, the followers of Mili Dueli were able to vote in the comments by entering the author’s number below the picture where her/his poem is presented. In addition to the readers, the members of the jury, composed of 12 renowned and important for Mili Duel artists from the Balkans, also voted. They selected 90% of the authors to pass to the Third Round. The other 10% is intended for the votes of the readers, for those who were not selected by the jury, and who have the great support of their friends and companions Mili Dueli.

Briefly about the Third Round: In the third round, the selection of the best authors continued and only the TOP 100 best authors had the opportunity to continue.

Briefly about the Fourth Round: The fourth round is brought by the TOP 50 best authors who pass to the final, fifth round. It is composed of a total of 16 duels.

You can see more about the Fourth Round (how it is voted, how it is organized) here:

Mili Dueli 2020: Organization Of The Fourth Round

FOURTH ROUND (SEMI-FINALS)

RESULTS

First of all, an important announcement … In the fourth round, we were looking for the 50 best authors according to the procedure established by the organization of the competition. Looking at the results, as the Organizer, I realized that in certain duels, the authors were much more dominant, and that surely many more authors deserved to pass, at least according to the presentation in the semifinals. For that purpose, I decided that the number of authors who go directly further should be 36, and that a total of 34 authors should fight for the remaining 14 places. All those authors who did not go directly further will equally send the poem for the finals, but only 14 of them will be presented, based on the quality of the submitted poem and the accompanying video material that traditionally adorns our Finals. More about everything, certainly below …

DUEL 7 – ALBANIA

Voting order: 1. NERMIN DELIĆ (Organizer) 2. SARAH ISUFI (Mentor) 3. DANJA GAŠPAR ĐOKIĆ (Additional Jury Member) 4. SIMO GOLUBOVIĆ (Additional Jury Member) 5. LELA ZJAJO (Additional Jury Member) 6. ANĐELA TURUKALO (Additional Jury Member) 7. ZDRAVKO ODORČIĆ (Additional Jury Member) 8. FACEBOOK VOTES (1st column – total likes author’s poem got; 2nd column – likes from our followers; 3rd column – No. of poem views) 9. INSTAGRAM VOTES (1st column – No. of poem views; 2nd column – No. of likes poem got)

WHAT’S NEXT? (PREPARATION FOR THE FINALS)

DARK BLUE. Authors who entered the TOP 50 directly! These authors are officially the finalists of this season, therefore, participants in the last round of Mili DuelI 2020/21. From this moment on, they need to contact their mentors and start preparing the poem for the Finals. All details related to the preparation and sending of the poem for the Finals will be received in a private message in the inbox. Please be patient!

LIGHT BLUE. – Authors who has chance to participate in the finals, the last round of Mili Duels 2020/21. These are authors who did not go directly to the final round, but due to the fantastic performance in the semifinals, the Organizer decided to give a new opportunity to promote their poetry. There are a total of 34 of them in such a situation, and 14 of them will be participants in the Finals. The decision will be made by the Organizer based on their application for the Finals. From this point on, they can also contact their mentors and start preparing a poem for the Finals.

TOP 100 – Authors who remained in the TOP 100 and did not make it to the Mili Dueli 2020 Finals. Their contribution to the spread of the project and poetry will be rewarded by receiving electronic recognition for their participation as they represented their countries in a bright light (TOP 100 from 739 registered !!!), and will accordingly receive recognition for the intercultural dialogue of the Balkan countries and the countries of the world in which they participated.

All the presented poems will be represented in a electronic collection which, apparently, will have its own printed edition (summer, 2021), when MILI DUELI BALKAN TOUR awaits us. More on that soon!

Also, all authors who are 2000 or younger will be presented at the MILI DUEL JUNIOR ONLINE POETRY CONTEST which will start a few days after the end of the eighth season of Mili Duels 2020 – Online Balkan Poetry Contest!

 

JURY COMMENTS

Organizer: NERMIN DELIĆ

nermin delic

Dear friends,

First of all, thank you for showing the greatest sense of loyalty to the whole project this season. The Corona-year prolonged the contest itself, and at the same time some of my private achievements happened (I finished university and started working), so the time spent on the project was reduced to a certain extent. Either way, our play through poetry continued, and so in these wonderful summer days we had the opportunity to read the 100 most representative authors we had so carefully selected.

In this, the fourth and at the same time penultimate round, we had the opportunity to enjoy the poetry of all Balkan countries, but also many countries around the world. Somewhere it turned out to be good that there was longer voting time than in previous seasons. Looking at the number of views of all the semi-final poems, with 328,492 views on Facebook, my mission was already fulfilled. Looking at the countries that read us, I could not stop, if I started to list … Almost 330,000 times we entered the everyday life of people on social media with poetry… I noticed at the beginning that there were two camps among the authors; one who enthusiastically welcomed the publication of their poem and those who did not promote their poetry even to their friends. The former shared the same with their friends, because for the first time, somewhere in our region, people can vote for poetry; for the first time it was important to point out that you have passed the selection of 739 authors and you are one step closer to the end, exclusively with your poetry. Because this was not an invitation to like the conquest of handbags, irons, shelves, etc., this was an invitation to the world of poetry in which each of these 100 great authors lives!. But probably everyone had their reasons for being one and not the other, and from that point of view it certainly can’t be a complaint. I rewarded some of the poems, even though they had poor readability, because they are masterful in themselves!

Just led by a mass of people who wrote me every day who they were voting for, shared your poems so beautifully and decorated their Facebook walls, I didn’t want to conflict my opinion with the opinion of the masses. But points always say it all. So in this case. I started to comment and went in order, all in order to write as good and clear comments as possible, WHY such points. But then I finally realized that in most cases the same mistake, the same comment, was written only in different words.

Therefore, I decided to point out in general the following …

When submitting a poem, to any contest, anywhere, even where you are already sure that the poem will be published, awarded, or generally given some recognition, please take note of the following:

  1. LITERACY. There were so many mistakes that turned me away from some nice emotions I felt while reading your poems. If you’re a writer, that doesn’t mean you have to be computer-wise and orthographically perfect, but if you’re sending a poem somewhere, to someone, let it be viewed with other eyes as well; maybe someone who knows maybe less than you will know something more about certain things. It is this item that is crucial in depriving the spirit of amateurism that a writer can carry within himself. Four-dot in poems, spaces several times, unnecessary punctuation marks in the wrong places; all of which violates the RHYTHM and AESTHETIC VALUES and, ultimately, the GENERAL IMPRESSION of the poem. If you make me take a break in the wrong place with a comma, that thread that runs the poem will break, and I will remain confused. I have to admit that these mistakes were greatly reduced, as a team of mentors worked with the authors, but there were authors who submitted their poems without a mentor and where such mistakes were noticed.
  2. WORK WITH A MENTOR. This item may be crucial, as it involves collaboration on the selection and / or correction of a semi-final poem. It’s not just a conversation about a poem, it’s a conversation of two cultures, often two peoples, and you were representatives of your own. The basis of any peace is acquaintance, cooperation and compromise.
    We did not take it as evil if an author, in the words of his mentor, still insisted on being “according to him”, but it is a completely wrong form not to respect the form of the contest that requires cooperation, therefore, not to contact his mentor at all, not to greet him.
    My impression is certainly complemented by the opinion of my colleagues, members of the jury, and your mentors, and in this regard we are looking for a person who will be a part of us in the next season of the contest.
  3. OPINION OF READERS / YOUR FRIENDS. We should never primarily be guided by the number of likes and reviews that one author has achieved on the social network, because then the competition part would mean a struggle for numbers, and not for the quality of the poem. However, I am of the opinion that on this occasion as well, through the number of votes cast, you showed two things; first – how much you actually care about going through; the second – how much support you can actually collect for your poetry. I note that for the first time it is a vote for poetry, where free votes decide who will be the winner. In this regard, I rewarded all the authors who heartily presented their poem.
  4. POETIC VALUE OF THE TEXT. Many of the texts in the verse that are sent are often not clarified as poetry, so it was necessary to point out to the authors what is poetic and what is not in their poems. Judging subjectively, the original metaphors and comparisons are something I admired the most, because they impress the most. The most common example I give to everyone is this: if it was written IT WAS COLD it has less poetic value than IT WAS ICE, where in the same sense, a metaphor is introduced. If someone writes IT WAS WHITE LIKE SNOW, which is expected, clichéd and outdated, it will certainly be less impressive than IT WAS WHITE LIKE A NEEDLE HOUSE.
    When it comes to rhyming poems, rhymes should not be surpassed and expected. Here, too, the use of new poetic words and their skillfully found rhymes was appreciated. Of course, no one should invent hot water, but every step out of everyday life was considered a success.
  5. AESTHETIC VALUE OF THE TEXT. Applications submitted for the semifinals were to be complete. Any answer to the questions related to the biography and the general impression of the author about the contest was evaluated. Also, the poem itself was supposed to be completely computer-correct. It is extremely unnecessary to point out grammatical / spelling mistakes to someone in this round of the competition, because every such mistake is a sign of the author’s lack of dedication to the text and work with a mentor.
  6. GENERAL IMPRESSION. The authors have sent poems in the previous three rounds, too. It is also, a significant factor that influenced the distribution of my points.

 

Opinions of the rest of Jury Members

Zdravko Odorčić said that he is pretty much impressed by Albanian authors. He greets you all from Croatia.

Lela Zjajo said this: “It’s nice to go back to reading the poetry of all the semifinalists. In this Duel, I would single out the poems of Isabela Tafili and Fyodor Qorri, but Flogerta Krypi is not far behind with her poem “I have decided to become God”.
Isabela Tafili’s poem MAN AND THE FOREST impressed me greatly. It’s a finely told story even though the consequent mood subsides after reading. It is true that man is born and it is natural that nature, in some way, affects the growth and development of every man. What hurts is that man, when he gets stronger, does not pay enough attention to nature except that he occasionally admires its beauty.
In this poem, a story is told which should be a lesson that it should not be so, that is, that man should not treat nature contrary to what nature has given him.
The impression of the poem made me wander with my thoughts into the forest where today, by chance, I was walking and seeing a similar picture as the author wrote in her poem. A cleared, drained, miserable forest left in its grief, without the rains it so desperately needs after this year’s droughts. Sad, sad … and, with the power of will and mechanization, a man could do a lot to save her. Thus, she can only wait for each tree and the last branch to break off without strength and continue to fight for life.
I would say, great song! Bravo!

HOPE, HANGED ON ROSES, Fyodora Quorri is very nicely meaningful and reveals to us the deep emotion of this author. Although a very sad topic in terms of content, this author evoked some surviving moments of despair and sadness, and it is good to share this emotion with people. It is easier for the heart, and songs like this leave deep traces in our souls and therefore last a long time. Bravo!

The poems of Mimoza Rexhvelaj, Mita Tabaku and Alban Tufa are also poorly translated and the punctuation set in the wrong places spoils the overall impression. Rhythm and melody are lost in the search for meaning. I’m sorry I couldn’t find the appropriate meaning of this kind of poetry even though I really tried…
Certainly, I wish all the authors good luck!”

Sarah Isufi, their mentor, said this:

“Isabela Tafili:
Isabela, you have a lot of artistic motives in your poem. “The man and the forest” is such a captivating title, which intrigues the reader to continue. But the last strophe rips off the beauty of the whole it. I know this poem is too personal for you, but you don’t need to narrate word by word, exactly what happened. Sometimes all you have to do is grabbing those personal events, emotions and using them wisely, by adding flowers, colors, flavors, to make your poem great. And great poems produce great poets. You’re such a nice girl and I wish to read more from you.
Good luck!

Alban Tufa:
Alban, I’ve been pointing out to you several times, your narrative style of writing. Your thoughts are wise, diverse and interesting, but I would like you to work more on the emotive side of your poem, same as you did in:
“you love me without noise,
without pathetic words”, my favourite verses in your poem.
Good luck!

Mimoza Rexhvelaj:
Mimoza, I meet sequences of emotions among the simplicity of your poem, but you often tend to mix up elements that don’t belong to the same tablo. You’re an admirable woman and I wish you luck in your undertakings.

Flogerta Krypi:
Flogerta, I admired your poetic discipline in the previous rounds, and as a jury member I did read and voted you, but as a mentor, at this phase of the contest, due to no communication at all with you as a participant, I can’t place myself in the position of reading your semifinal’s poem.
Good luck, dear!

Mite Tabaku:
Mite, I love your darkness, dear.
“I was born from the barren uterus of life,
fed by drained breasts of destiny,
dandled in the dried lap of hope”, you don’t just write, you yell, taking metaphors and placing them orderly, playing with meaning and dandling merism a bit. I only wish you explored more topics, instead of embracing stoically your favourite ones. With the strength that characterizes your personality, you can do everything.
Good luck!

Fjodor Qorri:
Fjodor, I’m impressed with your will and humbleness for improvement and progress. I see a great poet in:
“Our traces on the waters,
gone without a sign,
we were some skinny, pale dragonflies,
like cities under mists, lost.
Our hopes as summer bangles,
on roses, hanged;
our eyes remained on the heavens,
our bodies on the paths”.
You’re a kind of mixture of romanticism and symbolism, and the more you work on greatening your topics and metaphors, the more awesome you’ll become.
I want to read more from you. Good luck!”

 

 

You can read poems by Albanian authors here:

Mili Dueli 2020/21: Poezija albanskih autora (Polufinale)

Mili Dueli
Mili Dueli Copyrights

MILI DUELI 

Made in Bosnia and Herzegovina
by Nermin Delić

Europe / Balkan Peninsula
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Central Bosnia Canton
Jajce Town 70202

Sva prava zadržana. // All rights reserved.

Objava MILI DUELI 2020/21: Semi-final results – DUEL 7 – Albania pojavila se prvi puta na Mili Dueli.

]]> https://milidueli.com/2021/08/10/mili-dueli-2020-21-semi-final-results-duel-7-albania/feed/ 0 10703 MILI DUELI 2020/21: Semi-final results – DUEL 6 – Bulgaria https://milidueli.com/2021/08/10/mili-dueli-2020-21-semi-final-results-duel-6-bulgaria/ https://milidueli.com/2021/08/10/mili-dueli-2020-21-semi-final-results-duel-6-bulgaria/#respond Tue, 10 Aug 2021 10:37:56 +0000 https://milidueli.com/?p=10678 Mili Duels 2020 (8th season) had 739 entries from 52 countries. It is the largest and most popular online poetry contest in this area, which for the 8th year in a row brings together poets…

Objava MILI DUELI 2020/21: Semi-final results – DUEL 6 – Bulgaria pojavila se prvi puta na Mili Dueli.

]]> Mili Duels 2020 (8th season) had 739 entries from 52 countries. It is the largest and most popular online poetry contest in this area, which for the 8th year in a row brings together poets from the region, and lately from around the world. Mili Dueli is headquartered in Jajce, Bosnia and Herzegovina. The purpose of the contest is to encourage intercultural dialogue among artists from the Balkans and the world. Being one of the most sensitive regions in the world with a turbulent past, the aim of the contest is to build bridges of culture and mutual respect between the once war-torn areas.

The contest is traditionally composed of 5 elimination rounds. In each round, the number of authors decreases, and in the last, Fifth round, the winner is decided by a voting system based on the Eurovision Song Contest scoring system. The main responsible person of the contest is Nermin Delić, the idea creator and organizer of the contest. For 8 years in a row, Mili Dueli have been gathering authors and spreading the influence of poetry in everyday life.

Nermin Delić

Briefly about the First Round: The selection of all received applications (739) was performed by Nermin Delić. The organizer selected 476 authors for presentation in the Second Round.

Briefly about the Second Round: After the selection in the First Round by the organizer of the contest, Nermin Delić, 476 authors were selected and presented in the Second Round. In the Second Round, the authors are classified in 12 duels, according to the countries they come from. Due to the number of participants, Bosnia and Herzegovina had 2 duels (DUEL 1, DUEL 2), and Serbia 3 (DUEL 3, DUEL 4, DUEL 5). Croatia, Montenegro, North Macedonia and Bulgaria had one duel each (DUEL 6, DUEL 7, DUEL 8, DUEL 9). Due to the small number of participants, authors from Albania, Greece, Kosovo, Romania and Slovenia were presented in one duel (DUEL 10). Poets with Balkan roots, but with current residence outside the Balkans, are grouped together in one duel (DUEL 11). In the end, all authors coming from non-Balkan countries are grouped into one duel (DUEL 12).

The beginning of the presentation of the duel on the official Facebook profile of Mili Dueli was on July 12, 2020. Duels are presented in order, every 2-3 or 4 days according to the scope of the duel. For the first 15 days from the presentation of the duel, the followers of Mili Dueli were able to vote in the comments by entering the author’s number below the picture where her/his poem is presented. In addition to the readers, the members of the jury, composed of 12 renowned and important for Mili Duel artists from the Balkans, also voted. They selected 90% of the authors to pass to the Third Round. The other 10% is intended for the votes of the readers, for those who were not selected by the jury, and who have the great support of their friends and companions Mili Dueli.

Briefly about the Third Round: In the third round, the selection of the best authors continued and only the TOP 100 best authors had the opportunity to continue.

Briefly about the Fourth Round: The fourth round is brought by the TOP 50 best authors who pass to the final, fifth round. It is composed of a total of 16 duels.

You can see more about the Fourth Round (how it is voted, how it is organized) here:

Mili Dueli 2020: Organization Of The Fourth Round

FOURTH ROUND (SEMI-FINALS)

RESULTS

First of all, an important announcement … In the fourth round, we were looking for the 50 best authors according to the procedure established by the organization of the competition. Looking at the results, as the Organizer, I realized that in certain duels, the authors were much more dominant, and that surely many more authors deserved to pass, at least according to the presentation in the semifinals. For that purpose, I decided that the number of authors who go directly further should be 36, and that a total of 34 authors should fight for the remaining 14 places. All those authors who did not go directly further will equally send the poem for the finals, but only 14 of them will be presented, based on the quality of the submitted poem and the accompanying video material that traditionally adorns our Finals. More about everything, certainly below …

DUEL 6 – BULGARIA

Voting order: 1. NERMIN DELIĆ (Organizer) 2. ANĐELA TURUKALO (Mentor) 3. DANJA GAŠPAR ĐOKIĆ (Additional Jury Member) 4. SIMO GOLUBOVIĆ (Additional Jury Member) 5. LELA ZJAJO (Additional Jury Member) 6. LJUBICA PETROVIĆ KOSOR (Additional Jury Member) 7. ZDRAVKO ODORČIĆ (Additional Jury Member) 8. FACEBOOK VOTES (1st column – total likes author’s poem got; 2nd column – likes from our followers; 3rd column – No. of poem views) 9. INSTAGRAM VOTES (1st column – No. of poem views; 2nd column – No. of likes poem got)

WHAT’S NEXT? (PREPARATION FOR THE FINALS)

DARK BLUE. Authors who entered the TOP 50 directly! These authors are officially the finalists of this season, therefore, participants in the last round of Mili DuelI 2020/21. From this moment on, they need to contact their mentors and start preparing the poem for the Finals. All details related to the preparation and sending of the poem for the Finals will be received in a private message in the inbox. Please be patient!

LIGHT BLUE. – Authors who has chance to participate in the finals, the last round of Mili Duels 2020/21. These are authors who did not go directly to the final round, but due to the fantastic performance in the semifinals, the Organizer decided to give a new opportunity to promote their poetry. There are a total of 34 of them in such a situation, and 14 of them will be participants in the Finals. The decision will be made by the Organizer based on their application for the Finals. From this point on, they can also contact their mentors and start preparing a poem for the Finals.

TOP 100 – Authors who remained in the TOP 100 and did not make it to the Mili Dueli 2020 Finals. Their contribution to the spread of the project and poetry will be rewarded by receiving electronic recognition for their participation as they represented their countries in a bright light (TOP 100 from 739 registered !!!), and will accordingly receive recognition for the intercultural dialogue of the Balkan countries and the countries of the world in which they participated.

All the presented poems will be represented in a electronic collection which, apparently, will have its own printed edition (summer, 2021), when MILI DUELI BALKAN TOUR awaits us. More on that soon!

Also, all authors who are 2000 or younger will be presented at the MILI DUEL JUNIOR ONLINE POETRY CONTEST which will start a few days after the end of the eighth season of Mili Duels 2020 – Online Balkan Poetry Contest!

 

JURY COMMENTS

Organizer: NERMIN DELIĆ

nermin delic

Dear friends,

First of all, thank you for showing the greatest sense of loyalty to the whole project this season. The Corona-year prolonged the contest itself, and at the same time some of my private achievements happened (I finished university and started working), so the time spent on the project was reduced to a certain extent. Either way, our play through poetry continued, and so in these wonderful summer days we had the opportunity to read the 100 most representative authors we had so carefully selected.

In this, the fourth and at the same time penultimate round, we had the opportunity to enjoy the poetry of all Balkan countries, but also many countries around the world. Somewhere it turned out to be good that there was longer voting time than in previous seasons. Looking at the number of views of all the semi-final poems, with 328,492 views on Facebook, my mission was already fulfilled. Looking at the countries that read us, I could not stop, if I started to list … Almost 330,000 times we entered the everyday life of people on social media with poetry… I noticed at the beginning that there were two camps among the authors; one who enthusiastically welcomed the publication of their poem and those who did not promote their poetry even to their friends. The former shared the same with their friends, because for the first time, somewhere in our region, people can vote for poetry; for the first time it was important to point out that you have passed the selection of 739 authors and you are one step closer to the end, exclusively with your poetry. Because this was not an invitation to like the conquest of handbags, irons, shelves, etc., this was an invitation to the world of poetry in which each of these 100 great authors lives!. But probably everyone had their reasons for being one and not the other, and from that point of view it certainly can’t be a complaint. I rewarded some of the poems, even though they had poor readability, because they are masterful in themselves!

Just led by a mass of people who wrote me every day who they were voting for, shared your poems so beautifully and decorated their Facebook walls, I didn’t want to conflict my opinion with the opinion of the masses. But points always say it all. So in this case. I started to comment and went in order, all in order to write as good and clear comments as possible, WHY such points. But then I finally realized that in most cases the same mistake, the same comment, was written only in different words.

Therefore, I decided to point out in general the following …

When submitting a poem, to any contest, anywhere, even where you are already sure that the poem will be published, awarded, or generally given some recognition, please take note of the following:

  1. LITERACY. There were so many mistakes that turned me away from some nice emotions I felt while reading your poems. If you’re a writer, that doesn’t mean you have to be computer-wise and orthographically perfect, but if you’re sending a poem somewhere, to someone, let it be viewed with other eyes as well; maybe someone who knows maybe less than you will know something more about certain things. It is this item that is crucial in depriving the spirit of amateurism that a writer can carry within himself. Four-dot in poems, spaces several times, unnecessary punctuation marks in the wrong places; all of which violates the RHYTHM and AESTHETIC VALUES and, ultimately, the GENERAL IMPRESSION of the poem. If you make me take a break in the wrong place with a comma, that thread that runs the poem will break, and I will remain confused. I have to admit that these mistakes were greatly reduced, as a team of mentors worked with the authors, but there were authors who submitted their poems without a mentor and where such mistakes were noticed.
  2. WORK WITH A MENTOR. This item may be crucial, as it involves collaboration on the selection and / or correction of a semi-final poem. It’s not just a conversation about a poem, it’s a conversation of two cultures, often two peoples, and you were representatives of your own. The basis of any peace is acquaintance, cooperation and compromise.
    We did not take it as evil if an author, in the words of his mentor, still insisted on being “according to him”, but it is a completely wrong form not to respect the form of the contest that requires cooperation, therefore, not to contact his mentor at all, not to greet him.
    My impression is certainly complemented by the opinion of my colleagues, members of the jury, and your mentors, and in this regard we are looking for a person who will be a part of us in the next season of the contest.
  3. OPINION OF READERS / YOUR FRIENDS. We should never primarily be guided by the number of likes and reviews that one author has achieved on the social network, because then the competition part would mean a struggle for numbers, and not for the quality of the poem. However, I am of the opinion that on this occasion as well, through the number of votes cast, you showed two things; first – how much you actually care about going through; the second – how much support you can actually collect for your poetry. I note that for the first time it is a vote for poetry, where free votes decide who will be the winner. In this regard, I rewarded all the authors who heartily presented their poem.
  4. POETIC VALUE OF THE TEXT. Many of the texts in the verse that are sent are often not clarified as poetry, so it was necessary to point out to the authors what is poetic and what is not in their poems. Judging subjectively, the original metaphors and comparisons are something I admired the most, because they impress the most. The most common example I give to everyone is this: if it was written IT WAS COLD it has less poetic value than IT WAS ICE, where in the same sense, a metaphor is introduced. If someone writes IT WAS WHITE LIKE SNOW, which is expected, clichéd and outdated, it will certainly be less impressive than IT WAS WHITE LIKE A NEEDLE HOUSE.
    When it comes to rhyming poems, rhymes should not be surpassed and expected. Here, too, the use of new poetic words and their skillfully found rhymes was appreciated. Of course, no one should invent hot water, but every step out of everyday life was considered a success.
  5. AESTHETIC VALUE OF THE TEXT. Applications submitted for the semifinals were to be complete. Any answer to the questions related to the biography and the general impression of the author about the contest was evaluated. Also, the poem itself was supposed to be completely computer-correct. It is extremely unnecessary to point out grammatical / spelling mistakes to someone in this round of the competition, because every such mistake is a sign of the author’s lack of dedication to the text and work with a mentor.
  6. GENERAL IMPRESSION. The authors have sent poems in the previous three rounds, too. It is also, a significant factor that influenced the distribution of my points.

 

Opinions of the rest of Jury Members

Lela Zjajo said this:

“This is a duel of authors who certainly deserve attention. Young people think differently, more freely and do not hesitate to write about everything they think about. Many need attention, because quality exists, talent is praised and rewarded. Great Duel and all my congratulations to all the authors.

RUZHA VELCHEVA – A wonderful vision of freedom!

DIMITAR DZHENEV – They are poets, they are also people and they have questions. Unfortunately, they often go unanswered because others don’t even think like poets. Great poem.

GENO NEDYALKOV – Beautiful miniature and unusual thinking of the author.

VALENTIN POPOV – Also, a very beautiful miniature. A short, well thought out story. I walked through the author’s thoughts and liked it.

DONKO NAYDENOV – I love dreamers! They feel poetry most beautifully.

NINKO KIRILOV – Very beautiful miniature.

YANA RADILOVA – Short, clear! And unusual!

LYUBOMIR KYUCHUKOV – Sonata without melody. In addition to this sonata, much more was needed …

KALOYAN HRISTOV – Dedication to grandfather. Wonderful! Wonderful!

DENIS OLEGOV – I’m not a fan of “hard to digest” poetry. Life is beautiful and there are many ways to beautify it even more with words. He works for himself, and then for others. An effort has been made. The experience is recognizable, but the tastes are different.

GEORGI SLAVOV – Yes, it was really difficult to put a title to a poem like this. What was the goal of the author and what he wanted to say with this song, I don’t know … but the inspirations are different and I respect and accept everyone who dares to try to enter the Finals of this competition in this way. It is a virtue to believe in yourself, but sometimes a man is deceived.

ALEX ARANUDOV – I am simply sorry when someone so young writes poetry like this. Heavy, dark, incomprehensible. Where is the love, that bright bond of life and the joy of feeling that is remembered and the poetry that is read?

JOANA HRISTOVA – Dark theme. I read and writhe. My face probably received the same expression as when I bite a rotten fruit that I don’t want to swallow. THE BUILDING is a very difficult poem. Hardly deceptive and hardly anyone who reads it will like it, not because of the poor quality, but because of the wrongly chosen topic for the Semifinals.
Isn’t our goal, in fact, to make our poems appeal to a readership? To wish to read it again and again, to remember it by the beauty of the verse, melody, story…

Anđela Turukalo, theirs mentor said this:

“Bulgaria… As usual, one of the best groups, but the hardest one to grade. I couldn’t possibly find a bad poem here this time, so I have to look into the core of every single one. I already feel sad for having to choose between these poems. Well done.

Ruzha Velcheva… Not a bad poem, definitely, but it’s too simple. Too plain for this group. It didn’t bring any special energy that would make it stand out, though the message is loud and clear. I feel that the semi-final round deserved something more powerful and memorable.

Dimitar Dzhenev… I love this one. Using the simple subject as fog, the writer managed to create such depth and emotion… He brought to mind a lot of questions here. The expression is amazing. Aesthetically, the poem is exactly what I want to see. Well done.

Geno Nedyalkov… Perfect. This is one amazing miniature: meaningful, powerful but playful. I love the motives this writer gave us.

Valentin Popov… Like a fine wine. The longer he’s with us, the better he gets. As his mentor, I was amazed with the poems we were choosing between. This one is short, but powerful and memorable. It almost feels like some scene from an old French romantic movie or something… Enchanting. It seems that he needed a better subject of writing for a better grade: something stronger and more creative.

Donko Naydenov… This poem is very nice. It’s descriptive and it brings some peaceful, but lively feeling. I like it. Yet, the subject was apparently a bit pale for this round. It wasn’t as intrusive as it should be.

Ninko Kirilov… This is a very emotional poem with a couple of disturbing moments, which create a bit of contrast. I loved every single word of it. Well done. Yet, the semi-final round for Bulgaria… There’s a lot of good poems, powerful poems and the slightest details make a difference.

Yana Radilova… One awesome miniature. I don’t usually appreciate the repetitive verses, but here that verse creates an atmosphere which is absolutely necessary. I love the pictures here and the way they’re connected, the way the situation unwinds to the very end. Ending is simple, yet powerful.

Lyubomir Kyuchukov… It’s a good poem, but it seems to me that it lacks fluency. In some parts it seems a bit torn, all over the place. The motives are good and I can see the talent here, it just needs a bit more work to make it perfect.

Kaloyan Hristov… This is another very emotional and touching poem. It’s almost palpable, the sincerity in expression. Lovely work, indeed. Still, I’m shocked, but this poem needed more drama and contrast to get to another level. It needed a bit more strength.

Denis Olegov… This poem is beautifully brought out. It’s deep and wise, with an important message. Every sentence is a wholeness for itself. Loved it. The ending fits perfectly, which is always an important thing. I can’t say that there’s a single thing I don’t like about this poem, it’s just that some other poems made me feel more.

Georgi Slavov… Very vivid poem, with striking motives. It’s direct and clear, with a strong attitude. I feel the first and the third strophe are a bit soft. Those could be done better. Yet, the rest of the poem is making it up. I love the ending.

Alex Arnaudov… I wasn’t really expecting a poem like this. As Valentin, this writer also keeps getting better and better. This one is very effective, with striking imagery. It’s socially engaged, yet it owns a poetic melody.

Ioana Hristova… This poem is very original and impressionable. Yet, I’d say it needed a bit of polish and more focus. This way, it feels a bit messy and all over the place. I do like the style of expression and scenes displayed here.”

 

 

You can read poems by Bulgarian authors here:

Mili Dueli 2020/21: Poezija bugarskih autora (Polufinale)

Mili Dueli
Mili Dueli Copyrights

MILI DUELI 

Made in Bosnia and Herzegovina
by Nermin Delić

Europe / Balkan Peninsula
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Central Bosnia Canton
Jajce Town 70202

Sva prava zadržana. // All rights reserved.

Objava MILI DUELI 2020/21: Semi-final results – DUEL 6 – Bulgaria pojavila se prvi puta na Mili Dueli.

]]> https://milidueli.com/2021/08/10/mili-dueli-2020-21-semi-final-results-duel-6-bulgaria/feed/ 0 10678 MILI DUELI 2020/21: Rezultati 4. kruga – DUEL 5 – Sjeverna Makedonija https://milidueli.com/2021/08/09/mili-dueli-2020-21-rezultati-4-kruga-duel-5-sjeverna-makedonija/ https://milidueli.com/2021/08/09/mili-dueli-2020-21-rezultati-4-kruga-duel-5-sjeverna-makedonija/#respond Mon, 09 Aug 2021 18:40:51 +0000 https://milidueli.com/?p=10651 Mili Dueli 2020 (8. sezona) su imali 739 prijava iz 52 zemlje svijeta. Riječ je o najvećem i najpopularnijem online kontestu poezije na ovim prostoria koje već 8. godinu zaredom okuplja pjesnike regiona, a u…

Objava MILI DUELI 2020/21: Rezultati 4. kruga – DUEL 5 – Sjeverna Makedonija pojavila se prvi puta na Mili Dueli.

]]> Mili Dueli 2020 (8. sezona) su imali 739 prijava iz 52 zemlje svijeta. Riječ je o najvećem i najpopularnijem online kontestu poezije na ovim prostoria koje već 8. godinu zaredom okuplja pjesnike regiona, a u zadnje vrijeme i svijeta. Sjedište Mili Dueli je grad Jajce, Bosna i Hercegovina. Svrha kontesta je poticanje interkulturalnog dijaloga među umjetnicima Balkana i svijeta. Budući da se radi o jednom od najosjetljviijih regiona u svijetu sa burnom prošlošću, cilj kontesta je izgradnja mostova kulture i međusobnog uvažavanja između nekad ratom zahvaćenih područja.

Kontest je tradicionalno sastavljen od 5 eliminatornih krugova.U svakom krugu se broj autora smanjuje, a u posljednjem, Petom krugu, odlučuje se i pobjednik sistemom glasanja baziranom na bodovnom sistemu Eurovision Song Contest. Glavno odgovorno lice kontesta je Nermin Delić, idejni tvorac i organizator kontesta. Mili Dueli već 8 godina zaredom okupljaju autore i šire utjecaj poezije u svakodnevnici.

Ukratko o Prvom krugu: Selekciju svih pristigli prijava (739) je vršio Nermin Delić. Organizator je odabrao 476 autora za predstavljanje u Drugom krugu.

Ukratko o Drugom krugu:  Nakon selekcije u Prvom krugu od strane organizatora kontesta, Nermina Delića, odabrano je 476 autora koji su predstavljeni u Drugom krugu. U Drugom krugu, autori su svrstani u 12 duela, prema državama iz kojih dolaze. Zbog brojnosti učesnika, Bosna i Hercegovina je imala 2 duela (DUEL 1, DUEL 2), a Srbija 3 (DUEL 3, DUEL 4, DUEL 5). Hrvatska, Crna Gora, Sjeverna Makedonija i Bugarska su imale zasebno po jedan duel (DUEL 6, DUEL 7, DUEL 8, DUEL 9). Zbog malobrojnosti učesnika, u jednom duelu su predstavljeni autori iz Albanije, Grčke, Kosova, Rumunije i Slovenije (DUEL 10). Pjesnici sa balkanskim korijenima, ali sa trenutnim prebivalištem van Balkana, svrstani su zajedno u jedan duel (DUEL 11). Na kraju, svi autori koji dolaze iz vanbalkanskih zemalja, svrstani su u jedan duel (DUEL 12).

Početak predstavljanja duela na zvaničnom Facebook profilu Milih Duela je bio 12. juli, 2020. godine. Dueli su predstavljani redoslijedom, na svaka 2-3 ili 4 dana shodno obimu duela. Prvih 15 dana od predstavljanja duela, pratioci Milih Duela su mogli glasati u komentarima upisivanjem rednog broja autora ispod slike gdje u opisu predstavljena njegova pjesma. Pored čitalaca, glasali su i članovi žirija, sastavljeni od 12 renomiranih i za Mile Duele važnih umjetnika Balkana. Oni su vršili odabir 90% autora koji će proći u Treći krug. Ostalih 10% je predviđeno za glasove čitalaca, za one koje žiri nije odabrao, a imaju veliku podršku svojih prijatelja i pratilaca Mili Dueli.

Ukratko o Trećem krugu: U trećem krugu je nastavljenja selekcija najboljih autora a samo TOP 100 najboljih autora su imali priliku nastaviti dalje.

Ukratko o Četvrtom krugu: Četvrti krug je donosi TOP 50 najboljih autora koji prolaze u finalni, peti krug. Sastavljen je iz ukupno 16 duela.

Više o Četvrtom krugu (kako se glasa, kako je organizovan) možete pogledati ovdje:

Mili Dueli 2020: Organizacija Četvrtog kruga

ČETVRTI KRUG

REZULTATI

Ponajprije, važno obavještenje… U četvrtom krugu smo tražili 50 najboljih autora po proceduri utvrđenoj organizacijom takmičenja. Gledajući rezultate, kao Organizator sam uvidio sam da su u određenim duelima autori bili znatno domnantniji, te da je sigurno mnogo više autora od predviđenog zaslužilo prolaz, bar prema predstavljanju u polufinalu. U tu svrhu sam odlučio da broj autora koji direktno prolaze dalje bude 36, a da se za preostalih 14 mjesta bori ukupno 34 autora. Svi ti autori koji nisu direktno prošli dalje će ravnopravno slati pjesmu za finale, ali će samo 14 njih biti predstavljeno, na osnovu kvalitete poslane pjesme i pratećeg video-materijala koji već tradicionalno krasi naše Finale. Više o svemu, svakako u nastavku…

DUEL 5 – SJEVERNA MAKEDONIJA

Redoslijed glasanja:  1. NERMIN DELIĆ (Organizator)   2. MILČO MISOSKI (Mentor)  3. LJUBICA PETROVIĆ KOSOR (Mentor)  4. ZDRAVKO ODORČIĆ (Mentor)  5. SIMO GOLUBOVIĆ (Dodatni član žirija)  6. ANĐELA TURUKALO (Dodatni član žirija)  7. DANJA GAŠPAR ĐOKIĆ (Dodatni član žirija 8. Čitaoci (Facebook glasovi – 1. stubac predstavlja broj ostvarenih lajkova na pjesmi – 2. stubac predstavlja broj lajkova na pjesmi od osoba koje su pratioci naše stranice – 3. stubac predstavlja broj pregleda objave ) 9. Čitaoci (Instagram glasovi)

 

ŠTA SADA?

TAMNO PLAVA BOJA. Autori koji su direktno ušli u TOP 50! Ti autori su zvanično finalisti ove sezone, dakle, učesnici posljednjeg kruga Mili Dueli 2020/21.  Već od ovog trenutka trebaju kontaktirati svoje mentore i početi pripremati pjesmu za Finale. Sve detalje vezane za pripremu i slanje pjesme za Polufinale (4. KRUG), dobit će u privatnoj poruci u inboks. Molimo strpljenje!

SVIJETLOPLAVA BOJA. – Autori koji su ušli u BARAŽ za učešće u finalu, posljednjem krugu Mili Dueli 2020/21. Riječ je o autorima koji nisu direktno prošli u finalni krug, ali zbog fantastičnog predstavljanja u polufinalu, Organizator je odlučio dati novu priliku za promovisanje njihove poezije. U četvrtom krugu ih u takvoj situaciji ima ukupno 34, a 14 od njih 34 će biti učesnici Finala. Odluku o tome će donijeti Organizator na osnovu njihove aplikacije za Finale. Već od ovog trenutka, oni mogu također kontaktirati svoje mentore i početi spremati pjesmu za Finale.

TOP 100 – Autori koji su ostali u TOP 100 nisu prošli u Finale Mili Dueli 2020/21.  Njihov doprinos širenju projekta i poezije će biti nagrađen time što će dobiti  elektronsko priznanje za  sudjelovanje budući da su svojim učešćem predstavljali svoje zemlje u sjajnom svjetlu (TOP 100 od 739 prijavljenih!!!), te će shodno tome dobiti priznanje za interkulturalni dijalog balkanskih zemalja i zemalja svijeta u kojem su učestovali.

Sve predstavljene pjesme će biti zastupljene u zajedničkom elektronskom zborniku koji će, po svemu sudeći, imati i svoje štampano izdanje, kada nas očekuje MILI DUELI BALKAN TOUR. Više o tome uskoro!

Također, svi autori koji su 2000. godište ili mlađi, će biti predstavljeni na MILI DUELI JUNIOR ONLINE POETRY CONTEST koji će startati par dana nakon završteka osme sezone Mili Dueli 2020 – Online Balkan Poetry Contest!

 

KOMENTAR ŽIRIJA

Organizator: NERMIN DELIĆ

nermin delic

Dragi prijatelji,

Prije svega hvala vam što ste u ovoj sezoni pokazali najveći vid odanosti cijelom projektu. Korona-godina je prolongirala i sam kontest, a uporedo s tim su se desila i neka moja privatna ostvarenja (završio sam fakultet i počeo da radim), pa se vrijeme utrošeno na projekt u određenoj mjeri smanjilo. Bilo kako bilo, naša se igra kroz poeziju nastavila, te smo tako u ovim divnim ljetnim danima imali priliku da čitamo 100 najreprezentativnijih autora koje smo tako pažljivo birali.

U ovom, četvrtom i ujedno pretposljednjem krugu, imali smo priliku da uživamo u poeziji svih zemalja Balkana, ali i mnogih zemalja svijeta. Negdje se pokazalo dobrim to što je bilo duže vremena za glasanje nego u ranijim sezonama. Gledajući broj pregleda svih pjesama polufinala, sa 328 492 pregleda na Facebooku, moja misija je već bila ispunjena. Gledajući zemlje koje su nas čitale, ne bih se mogao zaustaviti, ako bih krenuo nabrajati… Gotovo 330 000 puta smo poezijom ušli u svakodnevnicu ljudi na društvenoj mreži… Već u startu sam primjetio da su postojala dva tabora među autorima, oni koji su sa oduševljem dočekali objavu svoje pjesme i oni koju svoju poeziju nisu promovisali čak ni svojim prijateljima. Ovi prvi su istu dijelili sa svojim prijateljima, jer po prvi put, negdje na našim prostorima se i može glasati za poeziju; po prvi put je važno bilo istaći da si prošao selekciju 739 autora i na korak si do samog kraja, isključivo i samo svojom poezijom. Jer ovo nije bio poziv da se lajka osvajanje tašne, pegle, regala i slično, ovo je bio poziv u svijet poezije u kojem svako od ovih 100 sjajnih autora živi!. No, vjerovatno je svako imao svoje razloge zašto je bio jedno, a ne drugo, te s te strane to svakako ne može biti zamjerka. Neke pjesme sam nagradio, bez obzira što su imale slabu čitanost, jer su same po sebi maestralne!

Upravo vođen masom ljudi koji su svakodnevno pisali za koga glasaju, tako lijepo dijelili vaše pjesme i ukrašavali svoje zidove, nisam poželio da sukobljavam svoje mišljenje sa mišljenjem mase. No, bodovi uvijek sve govore. Tako i ovom slučaju. Krenuo sam da komentarišem i išao redom, sve u cilju da napišem što kvalitetnije i jasnije komentare, ZAŠTO ovakvi bodovi. No, onda sam, na samom kraju shvatio da je u većini slučajeva ista greška, isti komentar, pisan samo drugačijm riječima.

Stoga, odlučio sam da ukažem generalno na sljedeće…

Prilikom slanja pjesama, na bilo koji konkurs, bilo gdje, makar i tamo gdje ste već sigurni da će pjesma biti objavljena, nagrađena ili generalno da će joj biti dodijeljeno neko priznanje, molim vas, vodite računa o sljedećim stvarima:

  1. PISMENOST. Toliko je bilo grešaka koje su me već u startu odbile od nekih lijepih emocija koje sam osjećao čitajući vaše pjesme. Ako ste pisac, to ne znači da morate biti informatički i pravopisno savršeni, ali ako pjesmu šaljete negdje, nekome, dozvolite da se ona pregleda i drugim očima; možda će taj neko koji zna možda i manje od vas, znati nešto više po pitanju određenih stvari. Upravo ova stavka je ključna u lišavanju duha amaterizma koji jedan pisac može nositi u sebi. Pjesme sa četiri tačke, razmaci po nekoliko puta, nepotrebni interpunkcijski znaci na pogrešnim mjestima; sve to narušava RITAM i ESTETSKU VRIJEDNOSTI i, u konačnici, GENERALNI UTISAK o pjesmi. Ako me zarezom natjerate da predahnem na pogrešnom mjestu, ta nit kojom se vodi pjesma će pući, a ja ću ostati zbunjen. Moram priznati da su ove greške znatno umanjene, budući da je tim mentora radio sa autorima, ali je bilo autora koji su slali svoje pjesme bez mentora i gdje su ovakve greške uočene.
  2. RAD SA MENTOROM. Ova stavka je možda i ključna, budući da ona podrazumijeva saradnju na odabiru i/ili korekciji polufinalne pjesme. To nije samo razgovor o pjesmi, to je razgovor dvije kulture, često i dva naroda, a vi ste bili predstavnici svog. Osnova svakog mira je upoznavanje, saradnja i kompromis.
    Nismo uzimali za zlo ukoliko bi neki autor na riječi svog mentora, ipak insistirao da bude “po njegovom”, ali je potpuno pogrešna forma ne ispoštovati formu kontesta koja iziskuje saradnju, dakle, ne javiti se uopšte svom mentoru, ne pozdraviti ga.
    Moj utisak je svakako upotpunjen mišljenjem mojih kolega, članova žirija, a vaših mentora, i s tim u vezi mi i tražimo osobu koja će već u sljedećoj sezoni kontesta biti dio nas.
  3. MIŠLJENJE ČITALACA / VAŠIH PRIJATELJA. Nikada se primarno ne bismo trebali voditi brojem lajkova i pregleda koji je jedan autor ostvario na društvenoj mreži, jer tad bi takmičarski dio označavao borbu za brojkama, a ne za kvalitetom pjesme. Ipak, mišljenja sam da ste i ovom prilikom, kroz broj ostvarenih glasova, pokazali dvije stvari; prva – koliko vam je zapravo stalo do toga da prođete; druga – koliko zapravo i možete skupiti podrške za svoju poeziju. Napominjem da se po prvi put radi o glasanju za poeziju, gdje besplatni glasovi odlučuju ko će biti pobjednik. S tim u vezi, nagradio sam sve autore koji su srčano predstavljali svoju pjesmu.
  4. POETSKA VRIJEDNOST TEKSTA. Mnogi tekstovi u stihu koji se pošalju, često ne budu klarifikovani kao poezija, stoga je bilo nužno ukazati autorima šta je to poetično, a šta ne u njihovim pjesmama. Subjektivno procjenjujući, originalne metafore i poređenja su nešto čemu sam se najviše divio, jer ponajviše impresioniraju. Najobičniji primjer koji svima navodim jeste ovo: ukoliko se napiše BILA JE HLADNA to ima puno manju poetsku vrijednost od BILA JE LED, gdje u istom značenju, unesena metafora. Ukoliko neko napiše BILA JE BIJELA KAO SNIJEG, što je očekivano, isklišealizirano i prevaziđeno, to će svakako puno manje impresionirati nego BILA JE BIJELA KAO IGLO KUĆICA.
    Po pitanju rimovanih pjesama, rime ne bi trebale biti prevaziđene i očekivane: pr. tijelo – odijelo – bijelo. I tu se cijenila upotreba novih poetičnih riječi i njihovih vješto pronađenih rima. Naravno, niko ne treba izmišljati toplu vodu, ali se svaki iskorak iz svakidašnjeg smatrao uspjehom.
  5. ESTETSKA VRIJEDNOST TEKSTA. Aplikacije koje su se slale za polufinale su trebale biti potpune. Svaki odgovor na pitanja koja su bila vezana za biografiju i opšti utisak autora o kontestu se vrednovao. Također, sama pjesma je trebala biti potpuno informatički ispravna. Ukazivati nekome na gramatičke/pravopisne greške u ovom krugu takmičenja je krajnje nepotrebno, jer se svaka takva greška odličje autorske neposvećenosti tekstu i radu sa mentorom.
  6. OPĆI UTISAK. Autori su u prethodna tri kruga slali pjesme, također. To je također, značajan faktor koji je utjecao na raspodjelu mojih bodova.

 

Mišljenja ostatka žirija

Zdravko je istakao: “Bilo mi je zadovoljstvo biti nekim pjesnicima mentor. Posebno što su to mladi i neobični pjesnici iz Makedonije koji su mi kroz svoje pjesme pokazali njihov pogled na svijet poezije. Svaka pjesma je dobra na svoj način tako da su bodovi samo nijanse budući je takav način natjecanja.”

 

 

Pjesme makedonskih autora možete pogledati ovdje:

Mili Dueli 2020/21: Poezija makedonskih autora (Polufinale)

Mili Dueli
Mili Dueli Copyrights

MILI DUELI 

Made in Bosnia and Herzegovina
by Nermin Delić

Europe / Balkan Peninsula
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Central Bosnia Canton
Jajce Town 70202

Sva prava zadržana. // All rights reserved.

Objava MILI DUELI 2020/21: Rezultati 4. kruga – DUEL 5 – Sjeverna Makedonija pojavila se prvi puta na Mili Dueli.

]]> https://milidueli.com/2021/08/09/mili-dueli-2020-21-rezultati-4-kruga-duel-5-sjeverna-makedonija/feed/ 0 10651 MILI DUELI 2020/21: Rezultati 4. kruga – DUEL 4 – Crna Gora https://milidueli.com/2021/08/09/mili-dueli-2020-21-rezultati-4-kruga-duel-4-crna-gora/ https://milidueli.com/2021/08/09/mili-dueli-2020-21-rezultati-4-kruga-duel-4-crna-gora/#respond Mon, 09 Aug 2021 18:40:19 +0000 https://milidueli.com/?p=10649 Mili Dueli 2020 (8. sezona) su imali 739 prijava iz 52 zemlje svijeta. Riječ je o najvećem i najpopularnijem online kontestu poezije na ovim prostoria koje već 8. godinu zaredom okuplja pjesnike regiona, a u…

Objava MILI DUELI 2020/21: Rezultati 4. kruga – DUEL 4 – Crna Gora pojavila se prvi puta na Mili Dueli.

]]> Mili Dueli 2020 (8. sezona) su imali 739 prijava iz 52 zemlje svijeta. Riječ je o najvećem i najpopularnijem online kontestu poezije na ovim prostoria koje već 8. godinu zaredom okuplja pjesnike regiona, a u zadnje vrijeme i svijeta. Sjedište Mili Dueli je grad Jajce, Bosna i Hercegovina. Svrha kontesta je poticanje interkulturalnog dijaloga među umjetnicima Balkana i svijeta. Budući da se radi o jednom od najosjetljviijih regiona u svijetu sa burnom prošlošću, cilj kontesta je izgradnja mostova kulture i međusobnog uvažavanja između nekad ratom zahvaćenih područja.

Kontest je tradicionalno sastavljen od 5 eliminatornih krugova.U svakom krugu se broj autora smanjuje, a u posljednjem, Petom krugu, odlučuje se i pobjednik sistemom glasanja baziranom na bodovnom sistemu Eurovision Song Contest. Glavno odgovorno lice kontesta je Nermin Delić, idejni tvorac i organizator kontesta. Mili Dueli već 8 godina zaredom okupljaju autore i šire utjecaj poezije u svakodnevnici.

Ukratko o Prvom krugu: Selekciju svih pristigli prijava (739) je vršio Nermin Delić. Organizator je odabrao 476 autora za predstavljanje u Drugom krugu.

Ukratko o Drugom krugu:  Nakon selekcije u Prvom krugu od strane organizatora kontesta, Nermina Delića, odabrano je 476 autora koji su predstavljeni u Drugom krugu. U Drugom krugu, autori su svrstani u 12 duela, prema državama iz kojih dolaze. Zbog brojnosti učesnika, Bosna i Hercegovina je imala 2 duela (DUEL 1, DUEL 2), a Srbija 3 (DUEL 3, DUEL 4, DUEL 5). Hrvatska, Crna Gora, Sjeverna Makedonija i Bugarska su imale zasebno po jedan duel (DUEL 6, DUEL 7, DUEL 8, DUEL 9). Zbog malobrojnosti učesnika, u jednom duelu su predstavljeni autori iz Albanije, Grčke, Kosova, Rumunije i Slovenije (DUEL 10). Pjesnici sa balkanskim korijenima, ali sa trenutnim prebivalištem van Balkana, svrstani su zajedno u jedan duel (DUEL 11). Na kraju, svi autori koji dolaze iz vanbalkanskih zemalja, svrstani su u jedan duel (DUEL 12).

Početak predstavljanja duela na zvaničnom Facebook profilu Milih Duela je bio 12. juli, 2020. godine. Dueli su predstavljani redoslijedom, na svaka 2-3 ili 4 dana shodno obimu duela. Prvih 15 dana od predstavljanja duela, pratioci Milih Duela su mogli glasati u komentarima upisivanjem rednog broja autora ispod slike gdje u opisu predstavljena njegova pjesma. Pored čitalaca, glasali su i članovi žirija, sastavljeni od 12 renomiranih i za Mile Duele važnih umjetnika Balkana. Oni su vršili odabir 90% autora koji će proći u Treći krug. Ostalih 10% je predviđeno za glasove čitalaca, za one koje žiri nije odabrao, a imaju veliku podršku svojih prijatelja i pratilaca Mili Dueli.

Ukratko o Trećem krugu: U trećem krugu je nastavljenja selekcija najboljih autora a samo TOP 100 najboljih autora su imali priliku nastaviti dalje.

Ukratko o Četvrtom krugu: Četvrti krug je donosi TOP 50 najboljih autora koji prolaze u finalni, peti krug. Sastavljen je iz ukupno 16 duela.

Više o Četvrtom krugu (kako se glasa, kako je organizovan) možete pogledati ovdje:

Mili Dueli 2020: Organizacija Četvrtog kruga

ČETVRTI KRUG

REZULTATI

Ponajprije, važno obavještenje… U četvrtom krugu smo tražili 50 najboljih autora po proceduri utvrđenoj organizacijom takmičenja. Gledajući rezultate, kao Organizator sam uvidio sam da su u određenim duelima autori bili znatno domnantniji, te da je sigurno mnogo više autora od predviđenog zaslužilo prolaz, bar prema predstavljanju u polufinalu. U tu svrhu sam odlučio da broj autora koji direktno prolaze dalje bude 36, a da se za preostalih 14 mjesta bori ukupno 34 autora. Svi ti autori koji nisu direktno prošli dalje će ravnopravno slati pjesmu za finale, ali će samo 14 njih biti predstavljeno, na osnovu kvalitete poslane pjesme i pratećeg video-materijala koji već tradicionalno krasi naše Finale. Više o svemu, svakako u nastavku…

DUEL 4 – CRNA GORA

 

Redoslijed glasanja:  1. NERMIN DELIĆ (Organizator)   2. ANĐELA TURUKALO (Mentor)  3. ENEA HOTIĆ (Mentor)  4. LELA ZJAJO (Mentor)  5. SIMO GOLUBOVIĆ (Mentor)  6. LJUBICA PETROVIĆ KOSOR (Mentor)  7. DANJA GAŠPAR ĐOKIĆ (Dodatni član žirija)   8. Čitaoci (Facebook glasovi – 1. stubac predstavlja broj ostvarenih lajkova na pjesmi – 2. stubac predstavlja broj lajkova na pjesmi od osoba koje su pratioci naše stranice – 3. stubac predstavlja broj pregleda objave ) 9. Čitaoci (Instagram glasovi)

ŠTA SADA?

TAMNO PLAVA BOJA. Autori koji su direktno ušli u TOP 50! Ti autori su zvanično finalisti ove sezone, dakle, učesnici posljednjeg kruga Mili Dueli 2020/21.  Već od ovog trenutka trebaju kontaktirati svoje mentore i početi pripremati pjesmu za Finale. Sve detalje vezane za pripremu i slanje pjesme za Polufinale (4. KRUG), dobit će u privatnoj poruci u inboks. Molimo strpljenje!

SVIJETLOPLAVA BOJA. – Autori koji su ušli u BARAŽ za učešće u finalu, posljednjem krugu Mili Dueli 2020/21. Riječ je o autorima koji nisu direktno prošli u finalni krug, ali zbog fantastičnog predstavljanja u polufinalu, Organizator je odlučio dati novu priliku za promovisanje njihove poezije. U četvrtom krugu ih u takvoj situaciji ima ukupno 34, a 14 od njih 34 će biti učesnici Finala. Odluku o tome će donijeti Organizator na osnovu njihove aplikacije za Finale. Već od ovog trenutka, oni mogu također kontaktirati svoje mentore i početi spremati pjesmu za Finale.

TOP 100 – Autori koji su ostali u TOP 100 nisu prošli u Finale Mili Dueli 2020/21.  Njihov doprinos širenju projekta i poezije će biti nagrađen time što će dobiti  elektronsko priznanje za  sudjelovanje budući da su svojim učešćem predstavljali svoje zemlje u sjajnom svjetlu (TOP 100 od 739 prijavljenih!!!), te će shodno tome dobiti priznanje za interkulturalni dijalog balkanskih zemalja i zemalja svijeta u kojem su učestovali.

Sve predstavljene pjesme će biti zastupljene u zajedničkom elektronskom zborniku koji će, po svemu sudeći, imati i svoje štampano izdanje, kada nas očekuje MILI DUELI BALKAN TOUR. Više o tome uskoro!

Također, svi autori koji su 2000. godište ili mlađi, će biti predstavljeni na MILI DUELI JUNIOR ONLINE POETRY CONTEST koji će startati par dana nakon završteka osme sezone Mili Dueli 2020 – Online Balkan Poetry Contest!

 

KOMENTAR ŽIRIJA

Organizator: NERMIN DELIĆ

nermin delic

Dragi prijatelji,

Prije svega hvala vam što ste u ovoj sezoni pokazali najveći vid odanosti cijelom projektu. Korona-godina je prolongirala i sam kontest, a uporedo s tim su se desila i neka moja privatna ostvarenja (završio sam fakultet i počeo da radim), pa se vrijeme utrošeno na projekt u određenoj mjeri smanjilo. Bilo kako bilo, naša se igra kroz poeziju nastavila, te smo tako u ovim divnim ljetnim danima imali priliku da čitamo 100 najreprezentativnijih autora koje smo tako pažljivo birali.

U ovom, četvrtom i ujedno pretposljednjem krugu, imali smo priliku da uživamo u poeziji svih zemalja Balkana, ali i mnogih zemalja svijeta. Negdje se pokazalo dobrim to što je bilo duže vremena za glasanje nego u ranijim sezonama. Gledajući broj pregleda svih pjesama polufinala, sa 328 492 pregleda na Facebooku, moja misija je već bila ispunjena. Gledajući zemlje koje su nas čitale, ne bih se mogao zaustaviti, ako bih krenuo nabrajati… Gotovo 330 000 puta smo poezijom ušli u svakodnevnicu ljudi na društvenoj mreži… Već u startu sam primjetio da su postojala dva tabora među autorima, oni koji su sa oduševljem dočekali objavu svoje pjesme i oni koju svoju poeziju nisu promovisali čak ni svojim prijateljima. Ovi prvi su istu dijelili sa svojim prijateljima, jer po prvi put, negdje na našim prostorima se i može glasati za poeziju; po prvi put je važno bilo istaći da si prošao selekciju 739 autora i na korak si do samog kraja, isključivo i samo svojom poezijom. Jer ovo nije bio poziv da se lajka osvajanje tašne, pegle, regala i slično, ovo je bio poziv u svijet poezije u kojem svako od ovih 100 sjajnih autora živi!. No, vjerovatno je svako imao svoje razloge zašto je bio jedno, a ne drugo, te s te strane to svakako ne može biti zamjerka. Neke pjesme sam nagradio, bez obzira što su imale slabu čitanost, jer su same po sebi maestralne!

Upravo vođen masom ljudi koji su svakodnevno pisali za koga glasaju, tako lijepo dijelili vaše pjesme i ukrašavali svoje zidove, nisam poželio da sukobljavam svoje mišljenje sa mišljenjem mase. No, bodovi uvijek sve govore. Tako i ovom slučaju. Krenuo sam da komentarišem i išao redom, sve u cilju da napišem što kvalitetnije i jasnije komentare, ZAŠTO ovakvi bodovi. No, onda sam, na samom kraju shvatio da je u većini slučajeva ista greška, isti komentar, pisan samo drugačijm riječima.

Stoga, odlučio sam da ukažem generalno na sljedeće…

Prilikom slanja pjesama, na bilo koji konkurs, bilo gdje, makar i tamo gdje ste već sigurni da će pjesma biti objavljena, nagrađena ili generalno da će joj biti dodijeljeno neko priznanje, molim vas, vodite računa o sljedećim stvarima:

  1. PISMENOST. Toliko je bilo grešaka koje su me već u startu odbile od nekih lijepih emocija koje sam osjećao čitajući vaše pjesme. Ako ste pisac, to ne znači da morate biti informatički i pravopisno savršeni, ali ako pjesmu šaljete negdje, nekome, dozvolite da se ona pregleda i drugim očima; možda će taj neko koji zna možda i manje od vas, znati nešto više po pitanju određenih stvari. Upravo ova stavka je ključna u lišavanju duha amaterizma koji jedan pisac može nositi u sebi. Pjesme sa četiri tačke, razmaci po nekoliko puta, nepotrebni interpunkcijski znaci na pogrešnim mjestima; sve to narušava RITAM i ESTETSKU VRIJEDNOSTI i, u konačnici, GENERALNI UTISAK o pjesmi. Ako me zarezom natjerate da predahnem na pogrešnom mjestu, ta nit kojom se vodi pjesma će pući, a ja ću ostati zbunjen. Moram priznati da su ove greške znatno umanjene, budući da je tim mentora radio sa autorima, ali je bilo autora koji su slali svoje pjesme bez mentora i gdje su ovakve greške uočene.
  2. RAD SA MENTOROM. Ova stavka je možda i ključna, budući da ona podrazumijeva saradnju na odabiru i/ili korekciji polufinalne pjesme. To nije samo razgovor o pjesmi, to je razgovor dvije kulture, često i dva naroda, a vi ste bili predstavnici svog. Osnova svakog mira je upoznavanje, saradnja i kompromis.
    Nismo uzimali za zlo ukoliko bi neki autor na riječi svog mentora, ipak insistirao da bude “po njegovom”, ali je potpuno pogrešna forma ne ispoštovati formu kontesta koja iziskuje saradnju, dakle, ne javiti se uopšte svom mentoru, ne pozdraviti ga.
    Moj utisak je svakako upotpunjen mišljenjem mojih kolega, članova žirija, a vaših mentora, i s tim u vezi mi i tražimo osobu koja će već u sljedećoj sezoni kontesta biti dio nas.
  3. MIŠLJENJE ČITALACA / VAŠIH PRIJATELJA. Nikada se primarno ne bismo trebali voditi brojem lajkova i pregleda koji je jedan autor ostvario na društvenoj mreži, jer tad bi takmičarski dio označavao borbu za brojkama, a ne za kvalitetom pjesme. Ipak, mišljenja sam da ste i ovom prilikom, kroz broj ostvarenih glasova, pokazali dvije stvari; prva – koliko vam je zapravo stalo do toga da prođete; druga – koliko zapravo i možete skupiti podrške za svoju poeziju. Napominjem da se po prvi put radi o glasanju za poeziju, gdje besplatni glasovi odlučuju ko će biti pobjednik. S tim u vezi, nagradio sam sve autore koji su srčano predstavljali svoju pjesmu.
  4. POETSKA VRIJEDNOST TEKSTA. Mnogi tekstovi u stihu koji se pošalju, često ne budu klarifikovani kao poezija, stoga je bilo nužno ukazati autorima šta je to poetično, a šta ne u njihovim pjesmama. Subjektivno procjenjujući, originalne metafore i poređenja su nešto čemu sam se najviše divio, jer ponajviše impresioniraju. Najobičniji primjer koji svima navodim jeste ovo: ukoliko se napiše BILA JE HLADNA to ima puno manju poetsku vrijednost od BILA JE LED, gdje u istom značenju, unesena metafora. Ukoliko neko napiše BILA JE BIJELA KAO SNIJEG, što je očekivano, isklišealizirano i prevaziđeno, to će svakako puno manje impresionirati nego BILA JE BIJELA KAO IGLO KUĆICA.
    Po pitanju rimovanih pjesama, rime ne bi trebale biti prevaziđene i očekivane: pr. tijelo – odijelo – bijelo. I tu se cijenila upotreba novih poetičnih riječi i njihovih vješto pronađenih rima. Naravno, niko ne treba izmišljati toplu vodu, ali se svaki iskorak iz svakidašnjeg smatrao uspjehom.
  5. ESTETSKA VRIJEDNOST TEKSTA. Aplikacije koje su se slale za polufinale su trebale biti potpune. Svaki odgovor na pitanja koja su bila vezana za biografiju i opšti utisak autora o kontestu se vrednovao. Također, sama pjesma je trebala biti potpuno informatički ispravna. Ukazivati nekome na gramatičke/pravopisne greške u ovom krugu takmičenja je krajnje nepotrebno, jer se svaka takva greška odličje autorske neposvećenosti tekstu i radu sa mentorom.
  6. OPĆI UTISAK. Autori su u prethodna tri kruga slali pjesme, također. To je također, značajan faktor koji je utjecao na raspodjelu mojih bodova.

 

Mišljenja ostatka žirija

Simo je istaknuo sljedeće: “Ne znam zašto, ali sam u ovoj grupi očekivao mnogo više dobrih stihova i utisaka. Verovatno što sam od mnogih autora iz ove grupe već čitao bolje stihove koji su ostavili znatno bolji utisak na mene, ali prethodni stihovi ne odlučuju o oceni za stihove koje su ponudili za ovaj deo takmičenja. Bez imalo dileme odlučio sam da najbolju ocenu dodelim autoru pod rednim brojem jedan jer je ponudio veoma dobar sonet, a pisanje soneta, mora se priznati, privilegija je najboljih poeta. Ostale pesme poprilično su ujednačene, odlučivale su nijanse. Metafore Milene Simonović su veoma dobre. Čini mi se da je i poređenja koja je uspešno napisala, trebala pretvoriti/izraziti metaforom.”

Lela je pisala pojedinačne komentare, pa ih prenosim u cjelosti:

GORAN POPOVIĆ 1972 MNE Danilovgrad
Mentor: Anđela Turukalo
BAŠ KAO I JUČE …………………………………. Lijepa minijatura. Pri čitanju me misli odvedoše u vrijeme starijih pjesnika, a pjesma kao da je dolutala baš iz vječnosti i tako pojasnila da postoje i danas ljudi koji pišu pjesme slične školskim lektirama i onome što smo učili napamet ili što nam se priamilo na prva čitanja i nosilo nas kroz život.: J.J.Zmaj, D.Radović, D.Maksimović, i dr. Ovo bi trebalo biti komplimentom autoru, a nikako negativna kritika. Poređenje sa starijim generacijama pisaca je iskreno divljenje prema ovakvom stilu i lijepoj obradi pjesme. Mnogo lijepa pjesma.

MILOŠ LAZIĆ 1992 MNE Herceg Novi
Mentor: Anđela Turukalo
ODRAZ

Prilično slab odraz. Zbilja nemam pojma o čemu ovaj autor piše.

NATAŠA KARADŽIĆ 1994 MNE Podgorica
Mentor: Anđela Turukalo
Jer ođe su noći tako čarobne – Ponavljanje stiha “Jer ođe su noći tako čarobne” je ovoj pjesmi dao poseban akcenat u smislu osluškivanja da ćemo u sljedećim pronaći nešto jako zanimljivo i kao najava da će se dogoditi zaista nešto čarobno. Iako ponavljanja u poeziji nisu popularna, ova ponavljanja su dala neki novi smisao ostalim stihovima gdje nisam pronašla ništa što bi me očaralo, ništa novoga što već nije negdje zapisano, ništa na čemu bih se zadržala ili pohvalila. Osrednja pjesma no očito je da autorica ima smisla i naročito veliku ljubav gaji prema poeziji, što nikako nije zanemarivo. Ali, lijepo ….

RASIM RALLE GUTIĆ 1964 MNE Plav
Mentor: Enea Hotić
ROBOT
– Ova pjesma autora Rasima Gutića i jeste nešto novo u ovom takmičenju MD, a kako to on sam kaže da osjeti potrebu za novim i drugačijim ostvarenjima. Svestran autor, potpomognut zbivanjima na sceni i iza ili ispred kulisa, svakako nam je ponudio pjesmu nešto malo drugačiju. Cijenim novitete, cijenim napor i trud koji ovaj autor ulaže kako bi se što bolje predstavio čitateljskoj publici i žiriju. Cijenim zanimanje i prećenje svih dešavanja kroz Mile Duele i njegove posjete profilima i podrskom ostalim autorima ovogodišnjeg online takmičenja MD.
Svakako sam za soluciju da se treba obratiti pažnja na ovog autora jer je definitivno neobičan pristup poeziji.. Pisati o običnim ljudskim stvarima smatram nešto najljepše što se poezijom može kazati. Jedino na što bih skrenula pažnju autoru je nedostatak emocije i poetičnosti u pjesmi. Lako je prizemljiti se danas kad živimo u sveopćem haosu, ali ostati u krilu vlastitih misli, nabujale emocije i snovima, vrlo je teško. Ipak preporučujem. Srećno!

DIJANA TIGANJ 1995 MNE Petnjica (Vrbica)
Mentor: Enea Hotić
1. Oh, jeseni – Nekako me baš pogodila ova pjesma. Lijepo je to urađeno, no dorada je bila prijeko potrebna kako bi se dao akcenat na neke momente koji bi pjesmu učinili jačom nego što to jeste. Kad se srcem piše, uvijek mislimo da je to najbolje, no …
Tema pogađa, no nedostaje tu meni nešto …. Emocija čuda čini. Upotrijebiti je odabranim riječima da bi pjesma uspjela.

FILIP VIDAKOVIĆ 1998 MNE Bar
Mentor: Lela Zjajo
– obnova zavjeta – Neobična pjesma. Dopala mi se na prvo čitanje jer odiše mladalačkom snagom i lijepo zamišljenom temom svakodnevnice. Osim par viška upitnika, ovako posložena bez interpunkcije i ne izgleda loše. Kako sam , kao mentorica, rekla Filipu u prepisci, pjesma nije vrhunska ali je vrijedna pažnje i vrlo je dopadljiva. Recitiranjem i naglašavanjem došla bi do stvarnog izražaja i to bi već drugačije zvučalo. Dopadljivo, što i jeste cilj. Novija savremena poezija ima nešto u sebi što ljude privlači … Srećno Filipe

ANDRIJA RADOVIĆ 1998 MNE Podgorica
Mentor: Lela Zjajo
SUJEVJERJE JABUKA – Sa ovim autorom nisam ostvarila kontakt. Nije mi se javio, a moja potraga za njegovim profilom nije urodila plodom. Svakako da je pjesmu spremio sam i odlučio da mu mentor nije potreban, na što svakako ima pravo.
Pjesma SUJEVJERJE JABUKA je više informativna pjesma. Interesantan stil i ta podjela koja, po meni, nije bila neophodna. Svakako, autor ima i na to pravo ako je zbog učinka.
I ovom autoru želim mnogo sreće!

BRANKO VUKOVIĆ 1980 MNE Podgorica
Mentor: Ljubica Petrović Kosor
VIRUS ŽIVOTA – Aktuelna tema. Nije to loše no smatram da je za Polufinale ovakvog takmičenja bilo potrebno poslati malo jaču pjesmu, snažniju i odrađenu na način da može ući u veliku konkurenciju sa ostalim autorima ovog takmičenja.

TAMARA SENIĆ 1996 MNE Podgorica
Mentor: Ljubica Petrović Kosor
Slobodna – Vrlo smislena minijatura. Ko hoće da razumije pronaći će vrijednost rečenog.

MARKO VULEVIĆ 2002 MNE Andrijevica (Trešnjevo)
Mentor: Ljubica Petrović Kosor
ŽIVO PLATNO – Kad neko piše na ovakav način, ne bi smio u svojim željama ostati po strani nego se boriti svojim oružjem – pjesmom. Originalnost misli izražen podjelom lica oduševilo me. Zaista odlično. Sviđa mi se.

ANA PEJOVIĆ 1973 MNE Nikšić
Mentor: Simo Golubović
Jedini san smo – Nemam šta reći za ovu autoricu. Ništa me nije privuklo ovoj pjesmi. Pozija bez poezije …

AIDA ORAHOVAC KUČ 1985 MNE Podgorica
Mentor: Simo Golubović
BEZIMENU DEVOJKU TRAŽIO SAM U SNOVIMA — Lijepo.

MILENA SIMONOVIĆ – ŠARLI SIMON TROI 1986 MNE Kotor
Mentor: Simo Golubović
ČAROBNO PROKLETSTVO —- Šta reći … Odužilo se čitanje, svakidašnja tema i nikakvog bljeska ni čarobnosti u pjesmi.

Uživala sam u pjesmama ali zaista ovdje nemam favorita. Svi su podjednako dobri, inovativni. Želim im svima sreću podjednako.
Ovo su moji bodovi!

 

Anđela je, također, pisala posebne komentare, pa ih prenosim u cjelosti:

Goran Popović… Lijep sonet, prijatan za čitanje, dosta slikovito urađeno. Nemam bitnijih primjedbi. Četvrti krug je u pitanju, o ocjenama odlučuju nijanse; ali zadovoljna sam ovim izdanjem. Pisac se očigledno snalazi u različitim vrstama poezije sasvim dobro, pri čemu se meni možda najviše dopada njegova poezija za djecu. Svakako, bravo.

Miloš Lazić… Moglo se još raditi na melodiji i ritmu ove pjesme. Tematski je dobra, ideja mi se dopada, ali estetski nije pretjerano dobro.

Nataša Karadžić me je posebno iznenadila u ovom krugu. Lako upija savjete, lako ih primjenjuje. Do sad nisam imala priliku da sarađujem s njom kao mentor, ali primjećujem njen napredak i smatram da to treba cijeniti. Emocija koju unosi u poeziju je veoma prepoznatljiva. Smatram da je neophodno još raditi na formulaciji, na oblikovanju misli; ali isto tako prepoznajem da je u pitanju pjesnikinja koja je veoma otvorena za dalji rast.

Rasim Ralle Gutić… Njegovu poeziju znam od ranije, Čini mi se da mu prirodnije leže neke nježnije teme, ova pjesma mi ne djeluje tečno. Smatram da ritmički nije dobro urađena, a ideja je previše stroga za njegov suptilniji i emotivniji izraz. Cijenim pokušaj nečeg novog i modernijeg, ali mi se čini da se nije adekvatno prilagodio stilu i da je neophodan dalji rad.

Dijana Tiganj… Pjesma je veoma emotivna. Sviđa mi se način na koji pjesnikinja vlada izrazom. Ipak, za moj ukus je previše mekano. Smatram da ovoj pjesmi fali malo drame, malo kontrasta koji bi pojačao efekat iste. Kad vlada jedna emocija od početka do kraja, bez ikakvog remećenja koje bi “uzburkalo situaciju”, pjesma postaje malo monotona. Nadam se da će pjesnikinja razmisliti o ovome, pa da ću i pročitati nešto novo i življe. Srećno.

Filip Vidaković… Kao po običaju: dobra pjesma, zanimljivo formulisana. Ovaj put neću kritikovati nedostatak interpunkcije, jer bi istinski bila suvišna. Dopadaju mi se motivi. Bravo.

Andrija Radović… Nemam apsolutno ništa ovdje da kažem. Ubjedljivo najbolja pjesma u ovoj grupi. Svaka čast.

Branko Vuković… Žao mi je što je ovakva ocjena, ali u ovom krugu se ova pjesma nije pretjerano istakla. Ne mogu reći da mi se ne sviđa, ali smatram da je četvrti krug zaslužio neko bolje izdanje. Čini mi se da su pjesme iz prethodnih krugova bile dosta bolje od ove.

Tamara Senić… Ovakva tema je mogla biti mnogo snažnije izvedena. Fale metafore, fali snage i dramatičnosti. Previše je jednostavna pjesma za ovakvu ideju.

Marko Vulević… Izuzetno teška i duboka tema koja se mogla izvesti sa mnogo snažnijom emocijom i mnogo snažnijim motivima. “Leptirica bez krila” je kliše koji nevjerovatno smeta, još na samom početku. Ostatak pjesme nije precizno izveden. Djeluje kao da bi se još dosta moglo raditi ovdje. Kraj nije dovoljno efektan. Pjesma nije dovoljno tečna. Pjesnik je mlad i ima prostora za rast, pa se nadam boljim izdanjima.

Ana Pejović…Sjajna pjesma. Svaka čast.

Aida Orahovac Kuč… Djeluje mi kao da su, iz kruga u krug, loši izbori. Znam da pjesnikinja umije jako dobro i da napiše i da formuliše i da iznese emociju, ali ovo nije to. Početak pjesme je dosta blijedo urađen, sredinom se situacija popravlja, ali onda kraj naruši to. Previše je mekano, sa pojedinim momentima koji se već uveliko prepoznaju kao kliše. Smatram da je autorka mogla kreativnije ovo uraditi.

Milena Simonović… Dopada mi se zamisao, izvedba je dosta dobra- ali pjesma ne dolazi pretjerano do izražaja između ostalih. Moglo je bolje, ali nikako ne mogu reći da je loše urađeno.

 

Pjesme crnogorskih autora možete pogledati ovdje:

Mili Dueli 2020/21: Poezija crnogorskih autora (Polufinale)

Mili Dueli
Mili Dueli Copyrights

MILI DUELI 

Made in Bosnia and Herzegovina
by Nermin Delić

Europe / Balkan Peninsula
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Central Bosnia Canton
Jajce Town 70202

Sva prava zadržana. // All rights reserved.

Objava MILI DUELI 2020/21: Rezultati 4. kruga – DUEL 4 – Crna Gora pojavila se prvi puta na Mili Dueli.

]]> https://milidueli.com/2021/08/09/mili-dueli-2020-21-rezultati-4-kruga-duel-4-crna-gora/feed/ 0 10649 MILI DUELI 2020/21: Rezultati 4. kruga – DUEL 3 – Hrvatska https://milidueli.com/2021/08/09/mili-dueli-2020-21-rezultati-4-kruga-duel-3-hrvatska/ https://milidueli.com/2021/08/09/mili-dueli-2020-21-rezultati-4-kruga-duel-3-hrvatska/#respond Mon, 09 Aug 2021 16:46:47 +0000 https://milidueli.com/?p=10643 Mili Dueli 2020 (8. sezona) su imali 739 prijava iz 52 zemlje svijeta. Riječ je o najvećem i najpopularnijem online kontestu poezije na ovim prostoria koje već 8. godinu zaredom okuplja pjesnike regiona, a u…

Objava MILI DUELI 2020/21: Rezultati 4. kruga – DUEL 3 – Hrvatska pojavila se prvi puta na Mili Dueli.

]]> Mili Dueli 2020 (8. sezona) su imali 739 prijava iz 52 zemlje svijeta. Riječ je o najvećem i najpopularnijem online kontestu poezije na ovim prostoria koje već 8. godinu zaredom okuplja pjesnike regiona, a u zadnje vrijeme i svijeta. Sjedište Mili Dueli je grad Jajce, Bosna i Hercegovina. Svrha kontesta je poticanje interkulturalnog dijaloga među umjetnicima Balkana i svijeta. Budući da se radi o jednom od najosjetljviijih regiona u svijetu sa burnom prošlošću, cilj kontesta je izgradnja mostova kulture i međusobnog uvažavanja između nekad ratom zahvaćenih područja.

Kontest je tradicionalno sastavljen od 5 eliminatornih krugova.U svakom krugu se broj autora smanjuje, a u posljednjem, Petom krugu, odlučuje se i pobjednik sistemom glasanja baziranom na bodovnom sistemu Eurovision Song Contest. Glavno odgovorno lice kontesta je Nermin Delić, idejni tvorac i organizator kontesta. Mili Dueli već 8 godina zaredom okupljaju autore i šire utjecaj poezije u svakodnevnici.

Ukratko o Prvom krugu: Selekciju svih pristigli prijava (739) je vršio Nermin Delić. Organizator je odabrao 476 autora za predstavljanje u Drugom krugu.

Ukratko o Drugom krugu:  Nakon selekcije u Prvom krugu od strane organizatora kontesta, Nermina Delića, odabrano je 476 autora koji su predstavljeni u Drugom krugu. U Drugom krugu, autori su svrstani u 12 duela, prema državama iz kojih dolaze. Zbog brojnosti učesnika, Bosna i Hercegovina je imala 2 duela (DUEL 1, DUEL 2), a Srbija 3 (DUEL 3, DUEL 4, DUEL 5). Hrvatska, Crna Gora, Sjeverna Makedonija i Bugarska su imale zasebno po jedan duel (DUEL 6, DUEL 7, DUEL 8, DUEL 9). Zbog malobrojnosti učesnika, u jednom duelu su predstavljeni autori iz Albanije, Grčke, Kosova, Rumunije i Slovenije (DUEL 10). Pjesnici sa balkanskim korijenima, ali sa trenutnim prebivalištem van Balkana, svrstani su zajedno u jedan duel (DUEL 11). Na kraju, svi autori koji dolaze iz vanbalkanskih zemalja, svrstani su u jedan duel (DUEL 12).

Početak predstavljanja duela na zvaničnom Facebook profilu Milih Duela je bio 12. juli, 2020. godine. Dueli su predstavljani redoslijedom, na svaka 2-3 ili 4 dana shodno obimu duela. Prvih 15 dana od predstavljanja duela, pratioci Milih Duela su mogli glasati u komentarima upisivanjem rednog broja autora ispod slike gdje u opisu predstavljena njegova pjesma. Pored čitalaca, glasali su i članovi žirija, sastavljeni od 12 renomiranih i za Mile Duele važnih umjetnika Balkana. Oni su vršili odabir 90% autora koji će proći u Treći krug. Ostalih 10% je predviđeno za glasove čitalaca, za one koje žiri nije odabrao, a imaju veliku podršku svojih prijatelja i pratilaca Mili Dueli.

Ukratko o Trećem krugu: U trećem krugu je nastavljenja selekcija najboljih autora a samo TOP 100 najboljih autora su imali priliku nastaviti dalje.

Ukratko o Četvrtom krugu: Četvrti krug je donosi TOP 50 najboljih autora koji prolaze u finalni, peti krug. Sastavljen je iz ukupno 16 duela.

Više o Četvrtom krugu (kako se glasa, kako je organizovan) možete pogledati ovdje:

Mili Dueli 2020: Organizacija Četvrtog kruga

ČETVRTI KRUG

REZULTATI

Ponajprije, važno obavještenje… U četvrtom krugu smo tražili 50 najboljih autora po proceduri utvrđenoj organizacijom takmičenja. Gledajući rezultate, kao Organizator sam uvidio sam da su u određenim duelima autori bili znatno domnantniji, te da je sigurno mnogo više autora od predviđenog zaslužilo prolaz, bar prema predstavljanju u polufinalu. U tu svrhu sam odlučio da broj autora koji direktno prolaze dalje bude 36, a da se za preostalih 14 mjesta bori ukupno 34 autora. Svi ti autori koji nisu direktno prošli dalje će ravnopravno slati pjesmu za finale, ali će samo 14 njih biti predstavljeno, na osnovu kvalitete poslane pjesme i pratećeg video-materijala koji već tradicionalno krasi naše Finale. Više o svemu, svakako u nastavku…

DUEL 3 – HRVATSKA

 

Redoslijed glasanja:  1. NERMIN DELIĆ (Organizator)   2. ZDRAVKO ODORČIĆ (Mentor)  3. ENEA HOTIĆ (Mentor)  4. LELA ZJAJO (Mentor)  5. SIMO GOLUBOVIĆ (Mentor)  6. LJUBICA PETROVIĆ KOSOR (Dodatni član žirija)  7. DANJA GAŠPAR ĐOKIĆ (Dodatni član žirija)   8. Čitaoci (Facebook glasovi – 1. stubac predstavlja broj ostvarenih lajkova na pjesmi – 2. stubac predstavlja broj lajkova na pjesmi od osoba koje su pratioci naše stranice – 3. stubac predstavlja broj pregleda objave ) 9. Čitaoci (Instagram glasovi)

ŠTA SADA?

TAMNO PLAVA BOJA. Autori koji su direktno ušli u TOP 50! Ti autori su zvanično finalisti ove sezone, dakle, učesnici posljednjeg kruga Mili Dueli 2020/21.  Već od ovog trenutka trebaju kontaktirati svoje mentore i početi pripremati pjesmu za Finale. Sve detalje vezane za pripremu i slanje pjesme za Polufinale (4. KRUG), dobit će u privatnoj poruci u inboks. Molimo strpljenje!

SVIJETLOPLAVA BOJA. – Autori koji su ušli u BARAŽ za učešće u finalu, posljednjem krugu Mili Dueli 2020/21. Riječ je o autorima koji nisu direktno prošli u finalni krug, ali zbog fantastičnog predstavljanja u polufinalu, Organizator je odlučio dati novu priliku za promovisanje njihove poezije. U četvrtom krugu ih u takvoj situaciji ima ukupno 34, a 14 od njih 34 će biti učesnici Finala. Odluku o tome će donijeti Organizator na osnovu njihove aplikacije za Finale. Već od ovog trenutka, oni mogu također kontaktirati svoje mentore i početi spremati pjesmu za Finale.

TOP 100 – Autori koji su ostali u TOP 100 nisu prošli u Finale Mili Dueli 2020/21.  Njihov doprinos širenju projekta i poezije će biti nagrađen time što će dobiti  elektronsko priznanje za  sudjelovanje budući da su svojim učešćem predstavljali svoje zemlje u sjajnom svjetlu (TOP 100 od 739 prijavljenih!!!), te će shodno tome dobiti priznanje za interkulturalni dijalog balkanskih zemalja i zemalja svijeta u kojem su učestovali.

Sve predstavljene pjesme će biti zastupljene u zajedničkom elektronskom zborniku koji će, po svemu sudeći, imati i svoje štampano izdanje, kada nas očekuje MILI DUELI BALKAN TOUR. Više o tome uskoro!

Također, svi autori koji su 2000. godište ili mlađi, će biti predstavljeni na MILI DUELI JUNIOR ONLINE POETRY CONTEST koji će startati par dana nakon završteka osme sezone Mili Dueli 2020 – Online Balkan Poetry Contest!

 

KOMENTAR ŽIRIJA

Organizator: NERMIN DELIĆ

nermin delic

Dragi prijatelji,

Prije svega hvala vam što ste u ovoj sezoni pokazali najveći vid odanosti cijelom projektu. Korona-godina je prolongirala i sam kontest, a uporedo s tim su se desila i neka moja privatna ostvarenja (završio sam fakultet i počeo da radim), pa se vrijeme utrošeno na projekt u određenoj mjeri smanjilo. Bilo kako bilo, naša se igra kroz poeziju nastavila, te smo tako u ovim divnim ljetnim danima imali priliku da čitamo 100 najreprezentativnijih autora koje smo tako pažljivo birali.

U ovom, četvrtom i ujedno pretposljednjem krugu, imali smo priliku da uživamo u poeziji svih zemalja Balkana, ali i mnogih zemalja svijeta. Negdje se pokazalo dobrim to što je bilo duže vremena za glasanje nego u ranijim sezonama. Gledajući broj pregleda svih pjesama polufinala, sa 328 492 pregleda na Facebooku, moja misija je već bila ispunjena. Gledajući zemlje koje su nas čitale, ne bih se mogao zaustaviti, ako bih krenuo nabrajati… Gotovo 330 000 puta smo poezijom ušli u svakodnevnicu ljudi na društvenoj mreži… Već u startu sam primjetio da su postojala dva tabora među autorima, oni koji su sa oduševljem dočekali objavu svoje pjesme i oni koju svoju poeziju nisu promovisali čak ni svojim prijateljima. Ovi prvi su istu dijelili sa svojim prijateljima, jer po prvi put, negdje na našim prostorima se i može glasati za poeziju; po prvi put je važno bilo istaći da si prošao selekciju 739 autora i na korak si do samog kraja, isključivo i samo svojom poezijom. Jer ovo nije bio poziv da se lajka osvajanje tašne, pegle, regala i slično, ovo je bio poziv u svijet poezije u kojem svako od ovih 100 sjajnih autora živi!. No, vjerovatno je svako imao svoje razloge zašto je bio jedno, a ne drugo, te s te strane to svakako ne može biti zamjerka. Neke pjesme sam nagradio, bez obzira što su imale slabu čitanost, jer su same po sebi maestralne!

Upravo vođen masom ljudi koji su svakodnevno pisali za koga glasaju, tako lijepo dijelili vaše pjesme i ukrašavali svoje zidove, nisam poželio da sukobljavam svoje mišljenje sa mišljenjem mase. No, bodovi uvijek sve govore. Tako i ovom slučaju. Krenuo sam da komentarišem i išao redom, sve u cilju da napišem što kvalitetnije i jasnije komentare, ZAŠTO ovakvi bodovi. No, onda sam, na samom kraju shvatio da je u većini slučajeva ista greška, isti komentar, pisan samo drugačijm riječima.

Stoga, odlučio sam da ukažem generalno na sljedeće…

Prilikom slanja pjesama, na bilo koji konkurs, bilo gdje, makar i tamo gdje ste već sigurni da će pjesma biti objavljena, nagrađena ili generalno da će joj biti dodijeljeno neko priznanje, molim vas, vodite računa o sljedećim stvarima:

  1. PISMENOST. Toliko je bilo grešaka koje su me već u startu odbile od nekih lijepih emocija koje sam osjećao čitajući vaše pjesme. Ako ste pisac, to ne znači da morate biti informatički i pravopisno savršeni, ali ako pjesmu šaljete negdje, nekome, dozvolite da se ona pregleda i drugim očima; možda će taj neko koji zna možda i manje od vas, znati nešto više po pitanju određenih stvari. Upravo ova stavka je ključna u lišavanju duha amaterizma koji jedan pisac može nositi u sebi. Pjesme sa četiri tačke, razmaci po nekoliko puta, nepotrebni interpunkcijski znaci na pogrešnim mjestima; sve to narušava RITAM i ESTETSKU VRIJEDNOSTI i, u konačnici, GENERALNI UTISAK o pjesmi. Ako me zarezom natjerate da predahnem na pogrešnom mjestu, ta nit kojom se vodi pjesma će pući, a ja ću ostati zbunjen. Moram priznati da su ove greške znatno umanjene, budući da je tim mentora radio sa autorima, ali je bilo autora koji su slali svoje pjesme bez mentora i gdje su ovakve greške uočene.
  2. RAD SA MENTOROM. Ova stavka je možda i ključna, budući da ona podrazumijeva saradnju na odabiru i/ili korekciji polufinalne pjesme. To nije samo razgovor o pjesmi, to je razgovor dvije kulture, često i dva naroda, a vi ste bili predstavnici svog. Osnova svakog mira je upoznavanje, saradnja i kompromis.
    Nismo uzimali za zlo ukoliko bi neki autor na riječi svog mentora, ipak insistirao da bude “po njegovom”, ali je potpuno pogrešna forma ne ispoštovati formu kontesta koja iziskuje saradnju, dakle, ne javiti se uopšte svom mentoru, ne pozdraviti ga.
    Moj utisak je svakako upotpunjen mišljenjem mojih kolega, članova žirija, a vaših mentora, i s tim u vezi mi i tražimo osobu koja će već u sljedećoj sezoni kontesta biti dio nas.
  3. MIŠLJENJE ČITALACA / VAŠIH PRIJATELJA. Nikada se primarno ne bismo trebali voditi brojem lajkova i pregleda koji je jedan autor ostvario na društvenoj mreži, jer tad bi takmičarski dio označavao borbu za brojkama, a ne za kvalitetom pjesme. Ipak, mišljenja sam da ste i ovom prilikom, kroz broj ostvarenih glasova, pokazali dvije stvari; prva – koliko vam je zapravo stalo do toga da prođete; druga – koliko zapravo i možete skupiti podrške za svoju poeziju. Napominjem da se po prvi put radi o glasanju za poeziju, gdje besplatni glasovi odlučuju ko će biti pobjednik. S tim u vezi, nagradio sam sve autore koji su srčano predstavljali svoju pjesmu.
  4. POETSKA VRIJEDNOST TEKSTA. Mnogi tekstovi u stihu koji se pošalju, često ne budu klarifikovani kao poezija, stoga je bilo nužno ukazati autorima šta je to poetično, a šta ne u njihovim pjesmama. Subjektivno procjenjujući, originalne metafore i poređenja su nešto čemu sam se najviše divio, jer ponajviše impresioniraju. Najobičniji primjer koji svima navodim jeste ovo: ukoliko se napiše BILA JE HLADNA to ima puno manju poetsku vrijednost od BILA JE LED, gdje u istom značenju, unesena metafora. Ukoliko neko napiše BILA JE BIJELA KAO SNIJEG, što je očekivano, isklišealizirano i prevaziđeno, to će svakako puno manje impresionirati nego BILA JE BIJELA KAO IGLO KUĆICA.
    Po pitanju rimovanih pjesama, rime ne bi trebale biti prevaziđene i očekivane: pr. tijelo – odijelo – bijelo. I tu se cijenila upotreba novih poetičnih riječi i njihovih vješto pronađenih rima. Naravno, niko ne treba izmišljati toplu vodu, ali se svaki iskorak iz svakidašnjeg smatrao uspjehom.
  5. ESTETSKA VRIJEDNOST TEKSTA. Aplikacije koje su se slale za polufinale su trebale biti potpune. Svaki odgovor na pitanja koja su bila vezana za biografiju i opšti utisak autora o kontestu se vrednovao. Također, sama pjesma je trebala biti potpuno informatički ispravna. Ukazivati nekome na gramatičke/pravopisne greške u ovom krugu takmičenja je krajnje nepotrebno, jer se svaka takva greška odličje autorske neposvećenosti tekstu i radu sa mentorom.
  6. OPĆI UTISAK. Autori su u prethodna tri kruga slali pjesme, također. To je također, značajan faktor koji je utjecao na raspodjelu mojih bodova.

 

Mišljenja ostatka žirija

Zdravko je istakao: “Veseli me što su iz mnoštva isplivali autori s dobrim pjesmama iako je teško pratiti pravila i podijelit’ bodove, No, bez obzira na daljnji tijek natjecanja poezija ovih autora će i dalje živjeti i ostavljati traga u budućnosti na nebu hrvatske poezije.”

Lela je pisala pojedinačne komentare, pa ih prenosim u cjelosti:

DINO HALVADŽIĆ 1993 CRO Zagreb
Mentor: Enea Hotić …………… Ova pjesma na mene nije ostavila poseban utisak. Ništa novo nije rečeno pjesmom i ovakve teme su do sada obrađivane toliko puta tako da smatram da je za Polufinale ipak trebalo malo više se potruditi. Obzirom da se mora računati na očitu i jaku konkurenciju među mnogim autorima, prihvatit ću da je ovo bio pogrešan izbor ovog autora.
Pregledajući profil Dine Halvadžića pronašla sam nekoliko vrlo lijepih pjesama koje bi ga dostojno predstavile u ovom Polufinalu. Na žalost, po meni, propuštena šansa. Želim svu sreću ovom autoru.

ANA NARANDŽIĆ 1949 CRO Zagreb
Mentor: Lela Zjajo …………………….. Vrlo lijepa suradnja sa ovom autoricom. Njena poezija mi je toliko legla srcu jer sam puno toga pronašla u njenim stihovima blisko meni i mojoj nutrini. Bilo je prilično lako odlučiti se koja pjesma će je najbolje predstaviti u Polufinalu i mislim da nismo pogriješile obzirom da smo obje pretendirale na Izolaciju.
Ova autorica posjeduje dubinu izražaja i tako ritmički lijepo, staloženo, lagano ulazi u svaki stih i izlazi iz njega sa svim potrebnim št čini poeziju. Njena Izolacija je poezija duše, rekla bih, jer u svakom stihu postoje dubina razmišljanja, osjećanja i potrebe riječima izraziti svaku svoju misao. Pri tome, upotreba lijepih i laganih metafora ukrasile su ovu pjesmu do potpunog sviđanja, a nakon čitanja Izolacije, svaki čitalac ima pred sobom priču koja je ispričana u samo nekoliko kratkih strofa. Odlično i vrlo inspirativno. Bez obzira na njene godine, prepoznajem istinsku poetsku dušu koja nam ima još mnogo toga reci svojom poezijom. Izvrsno, izvrsno!

JASNA ŠEMIGA PINTARIĆ 1971 CRO Bjelovar (Šandrovac)
Mentor: Simo Golubović ……………………………………………………………… Uvijek i vrlo teško prihvatam ovako pisanu poeziju bez obzira što prepoznajem nadarenost ove autorice. Lomim se iščitavajući stihove, u mislima postavljajući tačke i zareze kako bih imala pred očima cjelovitu misao. Gubeći nit tematike i sadržaja, ovakva pjesma me, u pravilu, ne oduševi, ali ipak ne mogu reći da ovu autoricu treba zanemariti niti zbog interpunkcije ostavljati po strani. Još gore bi bilo savjetovati promjenu stila jer tek onda autorica ne bi svojim stihovima došla do izražaja prilagođavajući se nečemu drugačijem no što je navikla. Svakako želim puno sreće i ovoj autorici.

STEVO LESKARAC 1963 CRO Zagreb
Mentor: Zdravko Odorčić ……………………………….. Ovo je autor kojeg jako volim da čitam i mimo predstavljanja u Milim Duelima. Njegovi su stihovi cjeloviti, jasni, pjesme kratke ali sa izvanrednim porukama, trenutačnim inspiracijama koje su duhovno vrlo privlačne i bliske svakom ko ih čita. Naoko jednostavnim izrazom ali biranim riječima mnogo toga on lijepoga kaže i vrlo vješto ukomponuje u jednu krasnu cjelinu. Ni ovu pjesmu ne mogu a da ne pohvalim jer je zaista tematski i vrlo pažljivo pisana. Moji komplimenti za Stevu Leskarca.

SNJEŽANA BUDANEC 1980 CRO Zagreb
Mentor: Zdravko Odorčić ……………………………………… Odlična pjesma! Ova autorica me sve više i više privlači svojim izvanrednim temama i izražajem. Pjesma je toliko originalna i suptilna da neki poseban komentar nije potreban osim da izrazim da sam oduševljena. Bravo!

BORIS KVATERNIK 1987 CRO Zagreb
Mentor: Zdravko Odorčić …………………………. I ovog izvrsnog autora jako volim da čitam. Ima tog nečega neobjašnjivog, a tako privlačnog u njegovu izrazu bez obzira na koju temu piše.
Ovaj put mi baš ne odgovaraju mračne teme pa iz tog razloga sam suzdržana prema kvaliteti pjesme. Svakako da zaslužuje srednju ocjenu. Srećno!

Obzirom da je vrlo malo autora iz Hrvatske prošlo u Polufinale, a sigurna sam da ih ima još mnogo koji nisu prošli, a svakako su zaslužilil predstaviti se u Polufinalu, to mi je jako žao sto je tako ispalo jer mnogo njih zaslužuje i te kako našu pažnju. No, tako je kako je. Svim autorima želim mnogo sreće i uspješan prolazak u Finale ovog izvanrednog takmičenja.

 

 

Pjesme hrvatskih autora možete pogledati ovdje:

Mili Dueli 2020/21: Poezija hrvatskih autora (Polufinale)

Mili Dueli
Mili Dueli Copyrights

MILI DUELI 

Made in Bosnia and Herzegovina
by Nermin Delić

Europe / Balkan Peninsula
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Central Bosnia Canton
Jajce Town 70202

Sva prava zadržana. // All rights reserved.

Objava MILI DUELI 2020/21: Rezultati 4. kruga – DUEL 3 – Hrvatska pojavila se prvi puta na Mili Dueli.

]]> https://milidueli.com/2021/08/09/mili-dueli-2020-21-rezultati-4-kruga-duel-3-hrvatska/feed/ 0 10643